European journal of orthodontics · 2024
Prognostic factors, outcomes, and complications for dental autotransplantation: an umbrella review.
СтатьяСистематический обзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Cremona Maria, Bister Dirk, Sherriff Martyn, Abela Stefan
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Dental autotransplantation (DAT) is a biological way of replacing missing or compromised teeth for patients. The techniques often necessitate a multi-disciplinary approach. The prognosis and success of the procedure may be impacted by variable factors in varying degrees.
OBJECTIVE: Evaluating outcomes and complications of DAT, including prognostic factors using an umbrella review.
SEARCH METHODS: Six databases were searched for all relevant systematic reviews published up to 30 June 2022. No restrictions were applied to language or publication date.
SELECTION CRITERIA: Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of DAT studies.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Identification, screening, eligibility, and quality assessment using the AMSTAR 2 tool were performed independently by two authors (M.C. and S.A.). Two studies (20%) scored moderate, six studies (60%) scored low, and two studies (20%) scored critically low. Data were analysed using a random effects meta-analysis, and meta-regression was performed to investigate the effect of open and closed apices on the dependent variables. The results were summarised as relative risk ratios.
RESULTS: A total of 310 studies were eligible for inclusion, of which 20 studies were selected for full-text evaluation. Ten systematic reviews were included, 9 of which had a meta-analysis. Overall findings suggest that DAT offers favourable success and survival rates. Meta-regression results indicate that a closed apex increased the proportion of ankylosis and resorption, reduced survival but had no effect on success during the observational period.
LIMITATIONS: A varying degree of heterogeneity and bias was present in all systematic reviews. The samples of donor teeth included in the systematic reviews also varied morphologically.
CONCLUSIONS: DAT is a technique-sensitive procedure requiring a multidisciplinary team, vigilant case assessment and thorough consideration of the respective prognostic factors involved. Despite methodological limitations reported across studies, DAT shows favourable success and survival rates, with a distinctive advantage of bone induction and soft tissue thickness preservation, and should, therefore, be considered as a viable treatment modality. Standardisation of clinical guidelines and practice are highly recommended.
REGISTRATION: CRD42020202484.
OBJECTIVE: Evaluating outcomes and complications of DAT, including prognostic factors using an umbrella review.
SEARCH METHODS: Six databases were searched for all relevant systematic reviews published up to 30 June 2022. No restrictions were applied to language or publication date.
SELECTION CRITERIA: Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of DAT studies.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Identification, screening, eligibility, and quality assessment using the AMSTAR 2 tool were performed independently by two authors (M.C. and S.A.). Two studies (20%) scored moderate, six studies (60%) scored low, and two studies (20%) scored critically low. Data were analysed using a random effects meta-analysis, and meta-regression was performed to investigate the effect of open and closed apices on the dependent variables. The results were summarised as relative risk ratios.
RESULTS: A total of 310 studies were eligible for inclusion, of which 20 studies were selected for full-text evaluation. Ten systematic reviews were included, 9 of which had a meta-analysis. Overall findings suggest that DAT offers favourable success and survival rates. Meta-regression results indicate that a closed apex increased the proportion of ankylosis and resorption, reduced survival but had no effect on success during the observational period.
LIMITATIONS: A varying degree of heterogeneity and bias was present in all systematic reviews. The samples of donor teeth included in the systematic reviews also varied morphologically.
CONCLUSIONS: DAT is a technique-sensitive procedure requiring a multidisciplinary team, vigilant case assessment and thorough consideration of the respective prognostic factors involved. Despite methodological limitations reported across studies, DAT shows favourable success and survival rates, with a distinctive advantage of bone induction and soft tissue thickness preservation, and should, therefore, be considered as a viable treatment modality. Standardisation of clinical guidelines and practice are highly recommended.
REGISTRATION: CRD42020202484.