DOI 10.1007/s00774-022-01338-2
Risk assessment of femoral pathological fracture in prostate cancer patients by computed tomography analysis.
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION
Prostate cancer often forms osteoblastic lesions that appear as a high-dense shadow upon X-ray. Although the lesions may seem to increase bone strength, pathological fracture occurs in one in four patients with prostate cancer. The aim of this study is to elucidate the factors that may increase the risk of pathological fracture in patients with prostate cancer metastases in the proximal femur by analyzing computed tomography data.
MATERIALS AND
METHODS
Computed tomography data of the femur of 62 prostate cancer patients were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into three groups based on the presence or absence of femoral metastatic lesions and pathological fracture. Surgical specimens of the proximal femur collected from patients who had a pathological fracture were histologically analyzed.
RESULTS
Bone density in the marrow area was increased in all cases with metastases compared with those with no metastases. Contrarily, the cortical bone density at the medial trochanter region was significantly lower in patients who had pathological fractures in the proximal femur than those who did not. Accordingly, histological analysis of the surgical specimens revealed that the affected cortical bone was osteopenic without any apparent new bone formation.
CONCLUSION
These results indicate that prostate cancer is less effective in inducing bone formation in the cortex than in the marrow and that the decrease in the cortical bone density at the medial trochanter region leads to an increased risk of pathological fracture. Therefore, a previously undocumented risk factor for pathological fracture in prostate cancer patients is presented.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.