MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1093/neuros/nyab300

Медицинская библиотека · Neurosurgery · 2021

Independent Predictors of Revision Lumbar Fusion Outcomes and the Impact of Spine Surgeon Variability: Does It Matter Whether the Primary Surgeon Revises?

Montenegro Thiago Scharth, Singh Akash, Elia Christopher, Matias Caio M, Gonzalez Glenn A, Saiegh Fadi Al, Philipp Lucas, Hattar Ellina, Hines Kevin, Fatema Umma, Thalheimer Sara, Wu Chengyuan, Prasad Srinivas K, Jallo Jack, Heller Joshua E, Sharan Ashwini, Harrop James

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

There is a paucity of information regarding treatment strategies and variables affecting outcomes of revision lumbar fusions.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the influence of primary vs different surgeon on functional outcomes of revisions.

METHODS

All elective lumbar fusion revisions, March 2018 to August 2019, were retrospectively categorized as performed by the same or different surgeon who performed the primary surgery. Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and clinical variables were collected. Multiple logistic regression identified multivariable-adjusted odds ratio (OR) of independent variables analyzed.

RESULTS

Of the 130 cases, 117 (90%) had complete data. There was a slight difference in age in the same (median: 59; interquartile range [IQR], 54-66) and different surgeon (median: 67; IQR, 56-72) groups (P = .02); all other demographic variables were not significantly different (P > .05). Revision surgery with a different surgeon had an ODI improvement (median: 8; IQR, 2-14) greater than revisions performed by the same surgeon (median: 1.5; IQR, -3 to 10) (P < .01). Revisions who achieved minimum clinically important difference (MCID) performed by different surgeon (59.7%) were also significantly greater than the ones performed by the same surgeon (40%) (P = .042). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that a different surgeon revising (OR, 2.37; [CI]: 1.007-5.575, P = .04) was an independent predictor of MCID achievement, each additional 2 years beyond the last surgery conferred a 2.38 ([CI]: 1.36-4.14, P < .01) times greater odds of MCID achievement, and the anterior lumbar interbody fusion approach decreased the chance of achieving MCID (OR, 0.19; [CI]: 0.04-0.861, P = .03).

CONCLUSION

All revision lumbar spinal fusion approaches may not achieve the same outcomes. This analysis suggests that revision surgeries may have better outcomes when performed by a different surgeon.

Для цитирования: Montenegro Thiago Scharth, Singh Akash, Elia Christopher, Matias Caio M, Gonzalez Glenn A, Saiegh Fadi Al, Philipp Lucas, Hattar Ellina, Hines Kevin, Fatema Umma, Thalheimer Sara, Wu Chengyuan, Prasad Srinivas K, Jallo Jack, Heller Joshua E, Sharan Ashwini, Harrop James. Independent Predictors of Revision Lumbar Fusion Outcomes and the Impact of Spine Surgeon Variability: Does It Matter Whether the Primary Surgeon Revises?. Neurosurgery. 2021. DOI: 10.1093/neuros/nyab300.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.