MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.neurom.2024.10.003

Медицинская библиотека · Neuromodulation : journal of the International Neuromodulation Society · 2024

Comparison of Spinal Cord Stimulation, Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation, and Association of Both in Patients With Refractory Chronic Back and/or Lower Limb Neuropathic Pain: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind, Cross-Over Trial (BOOST-DRG Study).

Rigoard Philippe, Ounajim Amine, Bouche Bénédicte, Moens Maarten, Goudman Lisa, Eldabe Sam, Roulaud Manuel, Lorgeoux Bertille, Baron Sandrine, Nivole Kévin, Many Mathilde, Lampert Lucie, David Romain, Billot Maxime

СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеСравнительное исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVES

Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) and dorsal root ganglion stimulation (DRGS) have individually shown efficacy in relieving pain in patients with persistent spinal pain syndrome after spinal surgery (PSPS-T2). Combining SCS and DRGS simultaneously, along with Burst stimulation programming, may enhance the responder rate of patients with PSPS-T2.

MATERIAL AND

METHODS

This study aimed to compare the pain relief (≥50%) responder rates in SCS, DRGS, and SCS+DGRS (DUAL) through a three-month randomized cross-over trial in patients with PSPS-T2. After the cross-over period, stimulation programming was switched to Burst. Secondary objectives included evaluating the clinical efficacy at three-, four-, six-, and 12-month follow-ups, assessing pain intensity, area of pain, area of paresthesia coverage, quality of life, functional disability, psychologic distress, medication intake, and the Multidimensional Clinical Response Index (MCRI).

RESULTS

The responder rate of pain relief was similar in SCS, DRGS, and DUAL (60%, p = 0.84) at the end of the cross-over period, increasing to 80% with the ability to switch between stimulation possibilities. Burst programming did not provide additional pain relief at the four-month follow-up (p = 0.99). Clinical outcomes significantly improved until 12-month follow-up compared with baseline. Considering a clinically significant increase of 1.05 of the MCRI, all patients were responders at three-, four-, and six- month follow-up, and 80% were responders at 12 months compared with baseline.

CONCLUSIONS

The full option to stimulate different neural structures, separately or simultaneously, led to improved responder rates, allowing patients to personalize treatment. A multidimensional assessment is essential to reveal the full potential benefits of neuromodulation in patients with chronic pain.

Для цитирования: Rigoard Philippe, Ounajim Amine, Bouche Bénédicte, Moens Maarten, Goudman Lisa, Eldabe Sam, Roulaud Manuel, Lorgeoux Bertille, Baron Sandrine, Nivole Kévin, Many Mathilde, Lampert Lucie, David Romain, Billot Maxime. Comparison of Spinal Cord Stimulation, Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation, and Association of Both in Patients With Refractory Chronic Back and/or Lower Limb Neuropathic Pain: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind, Cross-Over Trial (BOOST-DRG Study).. Neuromodulation : journal of the International Neuromodulation Society. 2024. DOI: 10.1016/j.neurom.2024.10.003.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.