MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.msksp.2022.102596

Медицинская библиотека · Musculoskeletal science & practice · 2022

Classification criteria for cervical radiculopathy: An international e-Delphi study.

Lam Kwun N, Heneghan Nicola R, Mistry Jai, Ojoawo Adesola O, Peolsson Anneli, Verhagen Arianne P, Tampin Brigitte, Thoomes Erik, Jull Gwendolen, Scholten-Peeters Gwendolyne G M, Slater Helen, Moloney Niamh, Hall Toby, Dedering Åsa, Rushton Alison, Falla Deborah

СтатьяConsensus StatementПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Establishing a set of uniform classification criteria (CC) for cervical radiculopathy (CR) is required to aid future recruitment of homogenous populations to clinical trials.

OBJECTIVES

To establish expert informed consensus on CC for CR.

DESIGN

A pre-defined four round e-Delphi study in accordance with the guidance on Conducting and Reporting Delphi Studies.

METHODS

Individuals with a background in physiotherapy who had authored two or more peer-reviewed publications on CR were invited to participate. The initial round asked opinions on CC for CR. Content analysis was performed on round one output and a list of discrete items were generated forming the round two survey. In rounds two to four, participants were asked to rate the level of importance of each item on a six-point Likert scale. Data were analysed descriptively using median, interquartile range and percentage agreement. Items reaching pre-defined consensus criteria were carried forward to the next round. Items remaining after the fourth round constituted expert consensus on CC for CR.

RESULTS

Twelve participants participated with one drop out. The final round identified one inclusion CC and 12 exclusion CC. The inclusion CC that remained achieved 82% agreement and was a cluster criterion consisting of radicular pain with arm pain worse than neck pain; paraesthesia or numbness and/or weakness and/or altered reflex; MRI confirmed nerve root compression compatible with clinical findings.

CONCLUSIONS

The CC identified can be used to inform eligibility criteria for future CR trials although caution should be practiced as consensus on measurement tools requires further investigation.

Для цитирования: Lam Kwun N, Heneghan Nicola R, Mistry Jai, Ojoawo Adesola O, Peolsson Anneli, Verhagen Arianne P, Tampin Brigitte, Thoomes Erik, Jull Gwendolen, Scholten-Peeters Gwendolyne G M, Slater Helen, Moloney Niamh, Hall Toby, Dedering Åsa, Rushton Alison, Falla Deborah. Classification criteria for cervical radiculopathy: An international e-Delphi study.. Musculoskeletal science & practice. 2022. DOI: 10.1016/j.msksp.2022.102596.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.