Journal of neurology · 2023
Face to Face: deciphering facial involvement in inclusion body myositis.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Fortanier Etienne, Delmont Emilien, Kouton Ludivine, Corazza Giovanni, Grapperon Aude-Marie, Verschueren Annie, Attarian Shahram, Salort-Campana Emmanuelle
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to evaluate the frequency and characteristics of facial involvement in inclusion body myositis (IBM) patients and to compare it to the one previously described in facioscapulohumeral dystrophy (FSHD) patients.
METHODS: Thirty-two IBM patients were included and compared to 29 controls and 39 FSHD patients. All participants were recorded in a video as they performed a series of seven facial tasks. Five raters independently assessed facial weakness using both a qualitative evaluation and a semi-quantitative facial weakness score (FWS).
RESULTS: IBM patients had higher FWS than controls (7.89 ± 7.56 vs 1.06 ± 0.88, p < 0.001). Twenty IBM patients (63%) had a facial weakness with a FWS above the maximum value for controls. All facial tasks were significantly more impaired in IBM patients compared to controls (p < 0.001), task 2 evaluating orbiculari oculi muscle weakness being the most affected. IBM patients with facial weakness reported more swallowing troubles than IBM patients without facial weakness (p = 0.03). FSHD patients displayed higher FWS than IBM patients (12.16 ± 8.37 vs 7.89 ± 7.56, p = 0.01) with more pronounced facial asymmetry (p = 0.01). FWS inter-rater ICC was 0.775.
CONCLUSION: This study enabled us to estimate the frequency of facial impairment in IBM in more than half of patients, to detail its characteristics and to compare them with those of FSHD patients. The standardized, semi-quantitative FWS is an interesting diagnostic help in IBM as it appeared more sensitive than qualitative evaluation to detect mild facial weakness.
METHODS: Thirty-two IBM patients were included and compared to 29 controls and 39 FSHD patients. All participants were recorded in a video as they performed a series of seven facial tasks. Five raters independently assessed facial weakness using both a qualitative evaluation and a semi-quantitative facial weakness score (FWS).
RESULTS: IBM patients had higher FWS than controls (7.89 ± 7.56 vs 1.06 ± 0.88, p < 0.001). Twenty IBM patients (63%) had a facial weakness with a FWS above the maximum value for controls. All facial tasks were significantly more impaired in IBM patients compared to controls (p < 0.001), task 2 evaluating orbiculari oculi muscle weakness being the most affected. IBM patients with facial weakness reported more swallowing troubles than IBM patients without facial weakness (p = 0.03). FSHD patients displayed higher FWS than IBM patients (12.16 ± 8.37 vs 7.89 ± 7.56, p = 0.01) with more pronounced facial asymmetry (p = 0.01). FWS inter-rater ICC was 0.775.
CONCLUSION: This study enabled us to estimate the frequency of facial impairment in IBM in more than half of patients, to detail its characteristics and to compare them with those of FSHD patients. The standardized, semi-quantitative FWS is an interesting diagnostic help in IBM as it appeared more sensitive than qualitative evaluation to detect mild facial weakness.