Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2022
Highly cross-linked polyethylene versus conventional polyethylene in primary total knee arthroplasty: comparable clinical and radiological results at a 10-year follow-up.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Giustra Fortunato, Bistolfi Alessandro, Bosco Francesco, Fresia Nicolò, Sabatini Luigi, Berchialla Paola, Sciannameo Veronica, Massè Alessandro
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Highly crosslinked polyethylene (HXLPE) was introduced in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) to reduce wear and consequent revisions for loosening due to conventional polyethylene (CPE) wear. This study aims to analyse whether HXLPE is as safe as CPE and could improve the TKA clinical and radiological results in a long-term follow-up.
METHODS: This retrospective study included all consecutive starting series of 223 patients with severe primary knee osteoarthritis (OA), with a minimum follow-up of 10 years treated between July 1st, 2007, and July 31st, 2010. After excluding patients who did not respect the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 128 patients were included in the analysis of this study. The patients were then divided into two groups according to the type of polyethylene (PE) implanted: CPE or HXLPE liners. All patients were evaluated for clinical and radiological parameters, causes and revision rates related to the type of PE implanted.
RESULTS: HXLPE appears to be as safe as CPE in TKA, reporting no higher revisions for osteolysis, prosthesis loosening, infection, and mechanical failure. Nevertheless, no statistically significant differences were found between the two groups in the clinical and radiological outcomes evaluated.
CONCLUSIONS: Clinical, radiological results, and revision rates are similar between HXLPE and CPE in TKA after 10 years of follow-up, although HXLPE benefits remain controversial.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.
METHODS: This retrospective study included all consecutive starting series of 223 patients with severe primary knee osteoarthritis (OA), with a minimum follow-up of 10 years treated between July 1st, 2007, and July 31st, 2010. After excluding patients who did not respect the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 128 patients were included in the analysis of this study. The patients were then divided into two groups according to the type of polyethylene (PE) implanted: CPE or HXLPE liners. All patients were evaluated for clinical and radiological parameters, causes and revision rates related to the type of PE implanted.
RESULTS: HXLPE appears to be as safe as CPE in TKA, reporting no higher revisions for osteolysis, prosthesis loosening, infection, and mechanical failure. Nevertheless, no statistically significant differences were found between the two groups in the clinical and radiological outcomes evaluated.
CONCLUSIONS: Clinical, radiological results, and revision rates are similar between HXLPE and CPE in TKA after 10 years of follow-up, although HXLPE benefits remain controversial.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.