MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1186/s12871-023-02257-z

Медицинская библиотека · BMC anesthesiology · 2023

Management of respiratory failure in immune checkpoint inhibitors-induced overlap syndrome: a case series and review of the literature.

Cuenca John A, Hanmandlu Ankit, Wegner Robert, Botdorf Joshua, Tummala Sudhakar, Iliescu Cezar A, Nates Joseph L, Reddy Dereddi R

ОбзорКлинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Checkpoint inhibitor-induced overlap syndrome ([OS] myocarditis, and myositis with or without myasthenia gravis) is rare but life-threatening.

CASES PRESENTATION: Here we present a case series of four cancer patients that developed OS. High troponinemia raised the concern for myocarditis in all the cases. However, the predominant clinical feature differed among the cases. Two patients showed marked myocarditis with a shorter hospital stay. The other two patients had a prolonged ICU stay due to severe neuromuscular involvement secondary to myositis and myasthenia gravis. Treatment was based on steroids, plasmapheresis, intravenous immunoglobulin, and immunosuppressive biological agents.

CONCLUSION

The management of respiratory failure is challenging, particularly in those patients with predominant MG. Along with intensive clinical monitoring, bedside respiratory mechanics can guide the decision-making process of selecting a respiratory support method, the timing of elective intubation and extubation.

Для цитирования: Cuenca John A, Hanmandlu Ankit, Wegner Robert, Botdorf Joshua, Tummala Sudhakar, Iliescu Cezar A, Nates Joseph L, Reddy Dereddi R. Management of respiratory failure in immune checkpoint inhibitors-induced overlap syndrome: a case series and review of the literature.. BMC anesthesiology. 2023. DOI: 10.1186/s12871-023-02257-z.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.