MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.jacep.2024.11.011

Медицинская библиотека · JACC. Clinical electrophysiology · 2025

Whole-Heart Histological and CMR Validation of Electroanatomic Mapping by Multielectrode Catheters in an Ovine Model.

Campbell Timothy, Bennett Richard G, Anderson Robert D, Davey Chris, O'Donohue Alexandra K, Schindeler Aaron, De Silva Kasun, Bhaskaran Ashwin, Turnbull Samual, Selvakumar Dinesh, Kotake Yasuhito, Hsu Chi-Jen, Chong James J H, Kizana Eddy, Kumar Saurabh

СтатьяВалидационное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Accurate electroanatomic mapping is critical for identifying scar and the long-term success of ventricular tachycardia ablation.

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to determine the accuracy of multielectrode mapping (MEM) catheters to identify scar on cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) and histopathology.

METHODS

In an ovine model of myocardial infarction, we examined the effect of electrode size, spacing, and mapping rhythm on scar identification compared to CMR and histopathology using 5 multielectrode mapping catheters. We co-registered electroanatomic mapping, CMR, and histopathology for comparison. Catheter-specific voltage thresholds were identified based on underlying amounts of normal myocardium on transmural histology biopsies.

RESULTS

Ten animals were included: 6 with anteroseptal myocardial infarction and 4 control animals. A total of 419,597 points were manually reviewed across the catheters, with 315,487 points used in the analysis. There were minimal differences in bipolar and unipolar voltages, scar areas, and abnormal electrograms between catheters and between rhythms. Catheter-specific bipolar and unipolar voltage thresholds for normal myocardium were High-Density Grid >2.78 mV and >6.19 mV, DuoDecapolar >2.22 mV and >6.05 mV, PentaRay >1.66 mV and >5.35 mV, Decanav >1.36 mV and >4.75 mV, Orion >1.21 mV and >6.05 mV, respectively. Catheter-specific bipolar thresholds improved the accuracy for detecting endo-mid myocardial scar on CMR by 1.8%-15.6% and catheter-specific unipolar thresholds improved the accuracy in the mid-epicardial layers by 25.3%-81.1%.

CONCLUSIONS

Minimal differences were observed in scar detection and electrogram markers between commercially available multielectrode mapping catheters and differing wave fronts. Compared to traditional voltage criteria for bipolar and unipolar scar, catheter-specific thresholds markedly improved accuracy for delineating scar on CMR.

Для цитирования: Campbell Timothy, Bennett Richard G, Anderson Robert D, Davey Chris, O'Donohue Alexandra K, Schindeler Aaron, De Silva Kasun, Bhaskaran Ashwin, Turnbull Samual, Selvakumar Dinesh, Kotake Yasuhito, Hsu Chi-Jen, Chong James J H, Kizana Eddy, Kumar Saurabh. Whole-Heart Histological and CMR Validation of Electroanatomic Mapping by Multielectrode Catheters in an Ovine Model.. JACC. Clinical electrophysiology. 2025. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacep.2024.11.011.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.