The Journal of arthroplasty · 2020
A Study on the Evaluation of a Risk Score of Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head Based on Survival Analysis.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Zheng Jiaqi, Wang Huan, Gao Youshui, Ai Zisheng
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: This study aimed at developing a risk score predicting the probability of developing an osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) in patients with femoral neck fracture within 3 years after closed reduction internal fixation and evaluating its performance, clinical utility, and internal validity.
METHODS: A retrospective follow-up study of 378 newly injured femoral neck fracture patients treated with 3 partially threaded parallel cannulated screws in 3 hospitals in Shanghai from March 2013 to January 2017 was performed. The patients were divided into development (n = 284) and validation (n = 94) cohorts. The risk score was constructed by Cox regression analysis in a form of nomogram. The performance and clinical utility were illustrated by box plots, calibration plots, and decision curve analysis.
RESULTS: Eighty-three of 378 patients had developed ONFH within 3 years. Garden alignment index, time to surgery, preoperative displace, impaction, and postoperative malposition were used as predictors to construct the risk score in a form of nomogram. In the development and validation cohort, the concordance index was 0.96 and 0.94, respectively; the discrimination slope was 0.51 and 0.47, respectively. In both cohorts, the calibration slopes and intercepts were 1 and 0, respectively. The risk score was clinically useful between the risk threshold of 0% and 88%. The performance and utility in the validation data illustrated good repeatability.
CONCLUSION: The risk score had satisfactory discrimination and calibration performance and demonstrated clinical utility with good internal validity. It managed to distinguish high-risk groups for post-traumatic ONFH.
METHODS: A retrospective follow-up study of 378 newly injured femoral neck fracture patients treated with 3 partially threaded parallel cannulated screws in 3 hospitals in Shanghai from March 2013 to January 2017 was performed. The patients were divided into development (n = 284) and validation (n = 94) cohorts. The risk score was constructed by Cox regression analysis in a form of nomogram. The performance and clinical utility were illustrated by box plots, calibration plots, and decision curve analysis.
RESULTS: Eighty-three of 378 patients had developed ONFH within 3 years. Garden alignment index, time to surgery, preoperative displace, impaction, and postoperative malposition were used as predictors to construct the risk score in a form of nomogram. In the development and validation cohort, the concordance index was 0.96 and 0.94, respectively; the discrimination slope was 0.51 and 0.47, respectively. In both cohorts, the calibration slopes and intercepts were 1 and 0, respectively. The risk score was clinically useful between the risk threshold of 0% and 88%. The performance and utility in the validation data illustrated good repeatability.
CONCLUSION: The risk score had satisfactory discrimination and calibration performance and demonstrated clinical utility with good internal validity. It managed to distinguish high-risk groups for post-traumatic ONFH.