MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.glohj.2019.09.003

Медицинская библиотека · Global health journal (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2019

What we have learnt from the SARS epdemics in mainland China?

Cao Wuchun, Fang Liqun, Xiao Dan

СтатьяОтозванная публикацияПеревод в очереди
Источник пометил публикацию как отозванную.

Аннотация

This article provides an overview of the severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) epidemics in mainland China and of what we have learned since the outbreak. The epidemics spanned a large geographical extent but clustered in two regions: first in Guangdong Province, and about 3 months later in Beijing and its surrounding areas. The resulting case fatality ratio of 6.4% was less than half of that in other SARS-affected countries and regions, partly due to younger-aged patients and a higher proportion of community-acquired infections. Strong political commitment and a centrally coordinated response were most important for controlling SARS. The long-term economic consequence of the epidemic was limited. Many recovered patients suffered from avascular osteonecrosis, as a consequence of corticosteroid usage during their infection. The SARS epidemic provided valuable experience and lessons relevant in controlling outbreaks of emerging infectious diseases, and has led to fundamental reforms of the Chinese health system. Additionally, the epidemic has substantially improved infrastructures, surveillance systems, and capacity to response to health emergencies. In particular, a comprehensive nationwide internet-based disease reporting system was established.

Для цитирования: Cao Wuchun, Fang Liqun, Xiao Dan. What we have learnt from the SARS epdemics in mainland China?. Global health journal (Amsterdam, Netherlands). 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.glohj.2019.09.003.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.