Injury · 2026
Patellar fractures: To plate them all? Results of a new treatment protocol.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Davidson Amit, Harats Elad, Levy Yadin, Stavsky Moshe, Lieberman Idan, Altergot Abraham, Bloom Shlomo
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: In recent years, anatomically contoured locking plates have been introduced as an alternative fixation method for patellar fractures. Biomechanical studies have demonstrated superior mechanical stability and clinical studies further suggest that plating reduces complication and revision rates, especially in comminuted fracture patterns. However, there is uncertainty regarding the role of plating in less complex fracture types. Following an institutional shift to routine plating of all surgically treated patellar fractures, this study compares outcomes and costs of plate versus non-plate fixation for patellar fractures.
METHODS: Retrospective cohort at a level-I trauma center (2016-2023). Patients undergoing fixation with ≥ 6-month follow-up were included. Major complications were fixation failure or deep infection; minor included superficial infection, ROM < 110°, persistent knee pain, or stair-climbing difficulty. Hardware removal was analyzed separately.
RESULTS: 125 patients met criteria (48 plating; 77 non-plate); 70% had AO C1-C2 patterns. Major complications occurred in 4% after plating versus 15% with non-plate (p = 0.07). Hardware removal rate was 8.3% with plating versus 26.0% without. Minor complication rates were lower with plating (p < 0.05). ROM was better after plating (0-136°) than non-plate fixation (1-126°). Cost analysis showed higher primary cost with plating, offset by fewer complications, yielding a net additional expenditure of $6413 overall.
CONCLUSION: Plating reduced complications and hardware removal and improved overall function, with modest additional cost.
METHODS: Retrospective cohort at a level-I trauma center (2016-2023). Patients undergoing fixation with ≥ 6-month follow-up were included. Major complications were fixation failure or deep infection; minor included superficial infection, ROM < 110°, persistent knee pain, or stair-climbing difficulty. Hardware removal was analyzed separately.
RESULTS: 125 patients met criteria (48 plating; 77 non-plate); 70% had AO C1-C2 patterns. Major complications occurred in 4% after plating versus 15% with non-plate (p = 0.07). Hardware removal rate was 8.3% with plating versus 26.0% without. Minor complication rates were lower with plating (p < 0.05). ROM was better after plating (0-136°) than non-plate fixation (1-126°). Cost analysis showed higher primary cost with plating, offset by fewer complications, yielding a net additional expenditure of $6413 overall.
CONCLUSION: Plating reduced complications and hardware removal and improved overall function, with modest additional cost.