The associations between myositis autoantibodies and clinical presentations in dermatomyositis.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
The myositis autoantibodies have been widely used clinically in recent years for the identification of an autoantibody-associated clinical phenotype in dermatomyositis (DM) patients. However, correlations between myositis autoantibodies and clinical presentations in different populations are lacking, especially in Taiwan.
OBJECTIVES
To investigate the correlations among cutaneous manifestations, myositis autoantibodies, and systemic diseases, including interstitial lung disease (ILD) and internal malignancy.
METHODS
A retrospective study of patients with histopathologically confirmed cutaneous manifestations of DM was conducted during 2005 to 2020 in Taiwan. A commercial line blot immunoassay technique was used to detect myositis autoantibodies.
RESULTS
A total of 88 DM patients were enrolled, with a mean age of onset of 49.4 years old. The most common systemic features were myositis (56.8%, 50/88), internal malignancy (22.7%, 20/88), dysphagia (19.3%, 17/88), and ILD (17%, 15/88). Among the enrolled patients, 32 patients received serum myositis autoantibodies examination. The most common autoantibodies were ANA (50.7%, 37/73), followed by anti-TIF1-γ (34.4%, 11/32) and anti-MDA5 (31.3%, 10/32) antibodies. Patients with Gottron sign (OR 5.6), arthritis (OR 23.35), or the presence of anti-MDA5 antibody (OR 11.14) were more susceptible to progressing to ILD, whereas patients with pruritus (OR 1.04), dysphagia (OR 6.73), and the presence of ANA (OR 6.29) had significantly higher risks of developing internal malignancies.
CONCLUSIONS
Physicians should pay special attention to certain clinical features, which can help with the early detection of systemic diseases. Cancer screening and myositis autoantibodies examination should be conducted in all DM patients if applicable.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.