MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.diii.2014.12.002

Медицинская библиотека · Diagnostic and interventional imaging · 2015

Mesenteric panniculitis: still an ambiguous condition.

Badet N, Sailley N, Briquez C, Paquette B, Vuitton L, Delabrousse É

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

PURPOSE: To study the possible relationship between mesenteric panniculitis (MP) visible on computed tomography (CT) and the presence of an underlying neoplastic disease.

PATIENTS AND

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 158 patients with CT examinations that revealed the presence of MP was performed. CT images were analyzed by two different radiologists using morphological criteria validated in the radiological literature. The presence, frequency and type of neoplastic lesions associated with MP were assessed.

RESULTS

MP was asymptomatic in 96/158 patients (61%). Fat halo sign and pseudocapsule were visible on CT in 89/158 (56%) and 93/158 (59%) patients, respectively. Underlying neoplastic disease was present in 88/158 patients (56%). The neoplastic diseases most often associated with MP were lymphoma (28%), melanoma (18%), colorectal cancer (15%) and prostate cancer (13%).

CONCLUSION

MP has typical CT appearance and is associated with underlying neoplastic disease in 56% of patients. Such levels of association might suggest that MP may be considered as a paraneoplastic condition. Hence, incidental depiction of MP on CT in a patient without known neoplastic disease should incite radiologists to further scrutinize CT examination for presence of synchronous neoplastic lesions.

Для цитирования: Badet N, Sailley N, Briquez C, Paquette B, Vuitton L, Delabrousse É. Mesenteric panniculitis: still an ambiguous condition.. Diagnostic and interventional imaging. 2015. DOI: 10.1016/j.diii.2014.12.002.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.