Georgian medical news · 2024
EARLY PREDICTORS OF NON-UNION OF DIAPHYSEAL TIBIAL FRACTURES BASED ON SCORING SYSTEMS.
СтатьяОбзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Umarov F, Samatov J
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: The lack of standardization in the assessment of healing potential of diaphyseal tibial fractures in the early stages of treatment leads to late diagnosis of non-union, which requires the development of prognostic diagnostic criteria that take into account possible risk factors.
OBJECTIVE: To analyze and evaluate the available scoring systems for predicting union and non-union of diaphyseal tibial fractures.
METHODS: We searched for publications in Scopus (Elsevier), PubMed, Publons, Medline, RSCI, Google, and Google Scholar databases.
RESULTS: Six systems for predicting the risk of non-union of tibial fractures were analyzed, 4 of which included clinical and surgical risk factors for non-union. The advantage of the scoring systems is the identification of interventional thresholds for early detection of non-union.
CONCLUSIONS: The Radiographic Union Scale for Tibia (RUST), the Tibia FRACTure prediction healING (FRACTING), the Leeds-Genoa Non-Union Index (LEG-NUT), and the Non-Union Scoring System (NUSS) are the most researched and recommended for clinical use. The Non-union Determination Score (NURD) and Tibial Fracture Healing Score (TFHS) systems require further evaluation.
OBJECTIVE: To analyze and evaluate the available scoring systems for predicting union and non-union of diaphyseal tibial fractures.
METHODS: We searched for publications in Scopus (Elsevier), PubMed, Publons, Medline, RSCI, Google, and Google Scholar databases.
RESULTS: Six systems for predicting the risk of non-union of tibial fractures were analyzed, 4 of which included clinical and surgical risk factors for non-union. The advantage of the scoring systems is the identification of interventional thresholds for early detection of non-union.
CONCLUSIONS: The Radiographic Union Scale for Tibia (RUST), the Tibia FRACTure prediction healING (FRACTING), the Leeds-Genoa Non-Union Index (LEG-NUT), and the Non-Union Scoring System (NUSS) are the most researched and recommended for clinical use. The Non-union Determination Score (NURD) and Tibial Fracture Healing Score (TFHS) systems require further evaluation.