Replacing one evil with another: Is the fibula really a dispensable spare part available for transfer in patients with medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaws?

Because of the long-term and consecutive use of different causative agents, clinicians are increasingly encountering patients needing restoration of the stomatognathic system after surgical resection of highly advanced necroses of the jaw. For plastic restoration in these cases, microvascular reconstruction seems to represent the most viable option. According to the limited data available, the risks of this operation are considered comparable with those faced by other patient cohorts. We report here the case of a patient who suffered 2 successive pathologic fractures of the tibia after microsurgical reconstruction of the mandible with a free fibula flap. This exemplifies a general problem, especially because the patient also suffered from a treatment-refractory infection of the transplanted bone. Although the present literature indicates otherwise, fibula transplants might not be the gold standard in these cases. Therefore, alternatives to transplants from the weight-bearing parts of the body need to be considered until more data are available.