Potential Targeting Mechanisms for Bone-Directed Therapies.

1. Introduction

Bone is an active metabolic tissue comprising inorganic and organic compounds along with several cell lineages [ 1 ]. Although bone remodeling is a dynamic process that ensures bone homeostasis in healthy individuals, bone-affecting diseases frequently impair this balance, leading to pathophysiological events, including inflammation, oxidative stress, and cell death [ 1 , 2 , 3 ], resulting in bone physiology impairment. Some bone-affecting diseases such as mucopolysaccharidoses (MPSs) [ 4 ], achondroplasia [ 5 ], osteogenesis imperfecta [ 6 ], thanatophoric dysplasia [ 7 ], among others, commonly lead to skeletal dysplasia. Unfortunately, when avascular zones in the bone are affected, the treatment becomes challenging [ 8 ]. For instance, in MPS IVA, a skeletal dysplasia caused by a lack of lysosomal hydrolase, the only Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved drug is based on the intravenous administration of the missing enzyme, which has a poor impact on the bone lesions [ 9 ]. The limited impact of this strategy has been mainly attributed to the low bioavailability of the enzyme in the avascular zones of the bone, such as the growth plate [ 10 ]. Growth plate chondrocytes are primarily affected in MPS IVA [ 4 , 11 ] ( Figure 1 ).

Some efforts have been made to increase the bioavailability of several drugs in the bone [ 8 ]. For instance, a study conducted by Almeciga-Diaz et al. showed that aspartate octapeptides (D8) significantly increase the adeno-associated virus (AAV) affinity by the hydroxyapatite [ 13 ], the most abundant inorganic material in the bone [ 14 ], supporting that bone-targeting therapies could be an interesting alternative for the treatment of bone-affecting diseases. Likewise, drugs targeting bone cell receptors, such as receptor activator for nuclear factor-κB ligand (RANKL) [ 15 ], sclerostin [ 16 ], and the type 1 parathyroid hormone receptor (PTH1R) [ 17 ], have also shown promising outcomes in vitro and in vivo in target therapies.

This paper comprehensively reviews the most relevant characteristics of the bone and its physiology and discusses how these insights can be turned into novel alternatives for bone-affecting diseases. A total of 188 original papers published in the last 10 years on PubMed, ScienceDirect, Google Scholar, and Web of Science were consulted. The search was conducted by using the following keywords and Boolean operators: (bone organic molecules AND bone-targeting) OR (bone inorganic molecules AND bone-targeting).

These searches helped us answer our research questions as follows: What are the potential molecules/compounds that can be utilized to target bone and cartilage? - We categorized them under organic and inorganic molecules. How do these molecules work? How are their structures modified? - We explained them briefly but not in detail to show their potential under current strategies. What are the roles of these molecules in cellular and bone development processes? - We provided information on their effects on the regulation of cellular processes. How are these molecules being implemented in preclinical/clinical studies? - A short summary of each study has been provided under each subtitle. What are the best potential molecules to target, specifically, the cartilage and bone growth plate? - Our specific goal is to find the best potential approaches for targeting bone growth plates and stimulating bone growth. Based on our particular interest, we focused on the molecules that can be utilized for growth plate targeting in the future, although we explained other targets in the current literature. Therefore, readers can find valuable information from an extended perspective.

2. Organic Molecules in Bone Targeting

ECM is one of the organic components containing, especially, collagen proteins: the collagen types I, III, IV, V, and VI, and non-collagen proteins: proteoglycans, glycoproteins, and gamma-carboxyglutamate (Gla) domain-containing proteins.

2.1. Collagens

The most prevalent collagen in bone is type I, composing 95% of the collagen content, although other types are also present. Type I collagen has a critical role in forming collagen fibrils, which, in turn, interact with other collagens and non-collagen proteins to assemble the fibril bundles and fibers. The collagen fibrils are organized concentrically into lamellae of bone, and within the same lamellae, all collagen fibers are parallel to each other while they might be oriented at an angle of up to 90° relative to each other. These concepts provide tensile strength, elasticity, and rigidity to bone [ 18 ]. Based on their abundance and roles in bone and cartilage, collagens are the highlighted targets for drug delivery to the bone. Collagen binding in mammals occurs via discoidin domain receptors (DDRs) that are transmembrane proteins and a subclass of receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs). The DDR family has two members: DDR-1, highly abundant in epithelial cells and leukocytes [ 19 ], and DDR-2, predominantly from mesenchymal origin, skeletal and heart muscles, kidney, and lung [ 20 ], which are the only RTKs interacting with structural components of the ECM and are not activated by soluble growth factors ( Figure 2 ). DDR-1 is composed of five splice-variant isoforms (DDR-1a–e). At the same time, DDR-2 is alone but shares highly conserved sequences with the DDR-1 family. The DDR family consists of an extracellular ligand-binding domain, a transmembrane domain, and an intracellular region containing a kinase domain. The signal transduction is activated with the receptor-specific ligand binding. When collagen binds to the DDRs, DDR phosphorylation is stimulated and thus activates kinase activity, signaling to mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), integrin, transforming growth factor-β (TGFβ), insulin receptors, and notch signaling pathways. Each DDR is stimulated by different collagens: DDR-1 by collagens I, IV, V, VI, and VIII and DDR-2 exclusively by the fibrillar collagen types I, III, and X [ 21 ]. Furthermore, DDR-1 is also activated by recognizing the GVMGVO peptide motif in both fibrillar collagens I, II, III, and VIII and non-fibrillar basement membrane collagen IV [ 21 , 22 ]. Collagen X is prevalent in the hypertrophic zone of the growth plate, which was shown to interact with chondrocytes, primarily with integrin α2β1. Later, the affinity of collagen X ligands was detected to be much higher for DDR-2 in the hypertrophic zone, and DDR-2 recognized the collagen X triple-helical binding site during receptor activation. The expression of DDR-2 was confirmed in the epiphyseal plate by RT-PCR and IHC [ 22 ]. Moreover, DDR-1 KO mice were characterized by the secondary ossification center’s delay in development and growth plate length increasing in the hind limbs. The proliferation of chondrocytes of the tibial growth plate was reduced, and Ihh, matrix metalloprotease (MMP-13), and collagen X were downregulated in chondrocytes, resulting in reduced terminal differentiation in the hypertrophic zone. As a result, decreased apoptosis delayed endochondral ossification and resulted in short stature and DDR-1-regulated terminal chondrocyte differentiation through the Ihh-Gli1-Gli2-collagen X pathway (Gli: effector transcriptional factor of Hedgehog signaling) [ 23 ]. Another study indicated that the silencing of DDR-2 contributed to severe skeletal growth and developmental defects in humans and mice. Expression and lineage analysis of chondrocytes showed selective expression of DDR-2 at the initial stages of bone formation in the resting zone and proliferating chondrocytes as well as periosteum. DDR-2+ cells could differentiate into hypertrophic chondrocytes, osteoblasts, and osteocytes and demonstrated a high level of colocalization with the skeletal progenitor marker Gli1. Ultimately, silencing of DDR-1 inhibited chondrogenic and osteogenic differentiation in limb bud chondroprogenitors and purified marrow-derived skeletal progenitors, respectively [ 24 ]. In MSCs, integrins α2β1 and α11β1 receptors interact with collagen I, ensuring cell survival and osteogenic differentiation via the protein kinase B (PKB/Akt) pathway. In contrast, the integrin α5 activation regulates human BM MSC (hBM MSC) differentiation into osteoblasts by activating focal adhesion kinase (FAK)/extracellular receptor kinase-1 (ERK-1/2)/MAPK and phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) signaling pathways [ 25 , 26 ]. DDRs modulate the differentiation of progenitor cells. The absence of DDR-1 in human adipose-derived MSCs reduces the chondrogenic genes and cartilaginous matrix deposition, suppressing the chondrogenic differentiation [ 27 ]. In the presence of collagen type I, hBM MSCs increased the expression of DDR-2 and α11β1. However, α11β1 was proven to be expressed significantly more during chondrogenic differentiation, while DDR-2 was in osteogenic differentiation [ 26 , 28 ]. The colocalization of DDR-2 was determined to correlate significantly with the expression of alkaline phosphatase (ALP) during mineralization [ 29 ]. Taken together, DDRs are one of the key factors in targeting bone-related cells. Particularly, the expression of DDR-2 on early-stage chondrocytes, which differentiate into trilineage cells, is an appealing approach for receptor-mediated endocytosis-related drug delivery strategies. Cartilage is a difficult-to-reach tissue, and the mechanisms underlying its uptake and signaling are still under investigation. However, as described in the literature for C-type natriuretic peptide (CNP) promoting bone growth [ 30 ], an administration of DDR-2-targeting peptide or reagents may provide options for the treatment of bone and cartilage diseases.

2.2. Proteoglycans

Proteoglycans (PGs) comprise one or more glycosaminoglycan (GAG) residues covalently bound to the protein core. GAG residues in these cores include keratan sulfate (KS), chondroitin sulfate (CS), heparan sulfate (HS), hyaluronic acid (HA), and dermatan sulfate (DS). Sulfated negatively charged GAGs have varying roles in cell-cell and cell-matrix interactions due to their biological structures comprising a repeating disaccharide unit, uronic acid, and hexosamines [ 34 ]. PGs are commonly found in cartilage matrix mediated by endochondral ossification, indicating that the initial bone formation matrix is initiated by chondrogenic proteins already incorporated into this matrix. Moreover, matrix maintenance, organization, and regulation of cartilage calcification are modulated by PGs via the interactions with the GAG residues present in type II and IX collagen fibrils. Therefore, PGs and GAGs can inhibit hydroxyapatite formation and growth due to changing pH, physiological ionic strengths, large hydrodynamic size, and high charge density of these macromolecules [ 35 ]. Moreover, hydroxyapatite formation was detected in positive and negative surfaces and different conditions of supersaturated solutions [ 36 ]. GAGs, as pharmacological targets, have been analyzed primarily on carcinogenesis, metastasis, bone and joint, hematologic, and brain disorders [ 36 , 37 ]. Yang et al. (2015) studied the adhesive effect of CS to enhance the integration of bioglass (BG) in the treatment of bone defects in rabbit models. After the encapsulation of BM in the BG-CS composite (BG-CS-BM), rabbits with critical-size distal femoral bone defects were administered and sacrificed 4 or 6 weeks after treatment. The results showed significant bone growth in the BG-CS-BM-treated group compared to BG only and the empty control. BG-CS showed a similar effect in bone formation, although relatively lower than BG-CS-BM over 6 weeks of implantation. Nevertheless, BG particle migration after treatment remained an unmet challenge, triggering inflammation [ 38 ]. In another study, poly(L-lactide)-sucrose acetate isobutyrate (PLLA-SAIB)-coated collagen-CS biomaterial encapsulating rhBMP-2 was assessed in the bone defects in rats, and the results indicated optimum osteogenic induction as well as the biocompatibility of biomaterial [ 39 ]. rhBMP-9, in another study, was combined with HA to assess the adsorption and release in ST2 preosteoblasts. Following treatment, osteoblast differentiation was evaluated through ALP activity, alizarin red staining, and real-time PCR of osteoblast differentiation markers (ALP, COL1α2, and OCN). HA-BMP-9 treatment was shown to induce osteoblast differentiation highly, while a negligible effect was observed on cell proliferation. Moreover, HA alone induced osteoblast differentiation, which was 4-fold lower than with the A-BMP-9 combination [ 40 ]. On the other hand, KS has been investigated to target various diseases, such as cartilage damage and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, inflammation, and malignant lymphoma [ 41 ]. KS is a critical GAG for maintaining a proper hydration level in skeletal tissues and resisting mechanical stress. KS is a highly accumulated GAG in bone and cartilage of mucopolysaccharidosis IVA (MPS IVA) patients due to the deficiency of N-acetylgalactosamine-6-sulfatase (GALNS) enzyme, resulting in the impairment of the further steps of KS catabolism. Hence, abnormal KS and C6-S levels appear in the tissues. Enzyme replacement therapy targets the GAGs accumulated. Although ERT slightly reduces this storage material in bone, disease progression is not fully corrected [ 42 , 43 ].

2.3. Small Leucine-Rich Proteoglycans

Small leucine-rich proteoglycans (SLRPs), for example, biglycan, decorin, keratocan, and asporin, regulate normal and pathological cellular behaviors, while fibromodulin, another type of SLRPs, regulates collagen fibrillogenesis. SLRPs participate in cell proliferation, osteogenesis, mineral deposition, and bone remodeling and thus contribute to maintaining bone homeostasis.

2.3.1. Biglycan and Decorin

Biglycan and decorin are significant SLRPs in bone having CS/DS GAG substitutions. Biglycan expression begins in cell proliferation and plays a critical role in bone matrix deposition and mineralization, while decorin is continuously expressed starting from early bone matrix deposition [ 44 ]. Biglycan has close contact with some ECM proteins, such as collagen types I–IV and elastin, that provide stability and organization in tissues, and it is involved in hydroxyapatite formation in bone. Although biglycan is strongly connected to the ECM, some factors, including tissue stress and injuries, impair its bond with the ECM, and these unexpected circumstances cause proteases to release the PGs from ECM [ 45 , 46 ]. Decorin has a high affinity for collagen fibrils and regulates collagen fibril assembly through its DS chains. It forms a ring-mesh-like structure to bundle collagen fibers in the same direction in the ECM [ 47 ]. It simultaneously interacts with many RTKs, including EGFR, VEGFR-2, and mesenchymal–epidermal transition factor (Met) receptors, which leads to the inhibition of these RTKs (decorin as a pan-RTK inhibitor) ( Figure 3 ) [ 46 ]. Besides its role in collagen fibril cross-linking and receptor mediation, decorin increases focal adhesion and proliferation of osteoblasts [ 48 ]. Osteoadherin is another SLRP containing the KS chain secreted by osteoblasts. It was found in the bovine mineralized bone matrix as a binding substance to hydroxyapatite [ 49 ].

2.3.2. Keratocan and Asporin

Keratocan is expressed in osteoblasts and regulates bone formation and mineral deposition rates in the murine KERA gene KO model by modulating osteoblast function [ 49 ]. Asporin binds to collagen type I to promote collagen mineralization via the poly aspartate domain binding to calcium and regulating hydroxyapatite formation. However, the binding of asporin to collagen was inhibited by recombinant asporin fragment leucine-rich repeat (LRR) 10-12 and by full-length decorin. Asporin and decorin were shown to compete for binding to collagen. The presence of asporin triggers the production of collagen nodules and increases the mRNA of osteoblastic markers Osterix and Runx2 [ 50 ].

2.3.3. Fibromodulin

Fibromodulin, a KS-chain SLRP, was found to be expressed by both chondrocytes and osteoblasts during fetal bone development. Moreover, it has interacted with the complement system and immune cells while functioning in inflammation-related diseases, such as osteoarthritis (OA), tendinopathy, atherosclerosis, and heart failure [ 51 , 52 ]. Fibromodulin and lumican, another KS-chain SLRP, were primarily determined in the precementum and pericementocyte area, and it was thought that they might have regulatory roles in the mineralization of cementum. Versican, biglycan, and decorin, DS-chain PGs, were also investigated for cementogenesis, and the results indicated that versican is found in the lacunae located in cementum and alveolar bone, decorin in the periodontal ligament and slightly in cementum matrix, and biglycan in cementoblasts/precementum.

In addition to classifying SLRPs via their N-terminal cysteine-rich clusters, evolutionary conservation, sequence homology, GAG chains, and biological functions, they can interact with various cell surface receptors, particularly RTKs and Toll-like receptors (TLRs) ( Figure 3 ). Therefore, downstream signaling pathways are activated. In the case of tissue stress or injury, SLRPs are released to the sites to act as damage-associated molecular patterns [ 46 , 53 ]. Taken all together, GAGs and SLRPs are potential biomarkers and therapeutic targets in many bone diseases, including osteo- and peripheral chondromas, OA, bone-affecting lysosomal storage disorders, etc., and they regulate bone morphogenesis and homeostasis. Furthermore, HS membrane-binding proteoglycans, syndecans (SDCs), and glypicans (GPCs) have been shown to activate different signaling pathways in MSCs. Silencing of SDC-1 led to the inhibition of canonical Wnt signaling due to the deficiency of β-catenin in mice and triggered a pro-adipogenic phenotype with enhanced osteoblast maturation in MSC cultures. In contrast, the upregulation of SDC-2 reduced osteoblastic and osteoclastic precursors in the BM of mice, as well as Wnt/β-catenin signaling in osteoblasts. SDC-3 knockdown caused a low bone volume and deteriorated bone architecture in adult mice, which is promoted through canonical Wnt signaling in osteoblasts [ 24 , 26 ]. In the case of GPCs, the dysregulation of GPCs in hBM MSCs of OA patients decreased the protein level of extracellular negative regulators of Wnt/β-catenin during osteogenic differentiation [ 26 ]. Additionally, Ihh signaling was hyperactivated in GPC3-null mouse embryos, while GPC6 promotes the growth of developing long bones via Ihh signaling [ 54 ]. Figure 3 Soluble SLRP-mediated downstream signaling has critical roles in cellular processes [ 46 , 55 ]. We summarize some of the signaling pathways; however, this diagram is still not fully completed because some receptors, such as TLR-2/4, have cross-talk mechanisms or interaction with different proteins (e.g., some cluster differentiation (CD) molecules; CD14 and CD44) in interleukin secretion, different pathways of angiogenesis (NOX-1/4 and ROS pathway), and autophagy. TGFβ and BMP are the receptors to which most SLRPs have different ways to bind and promote downstream signaling. The picture depicts biglycan binding to TGFβ and BMP to activate the SMAD pathways. Thus, the osteoblast-related genes can be transcribed for the bone formation process. CXCR is a receptor for keratocan that stimulates neutrophil granulation and activation. Angiogenesis is a critical process, particularly in bone development. Biglycan binding to TLR-2 and decorin binding to VEGFR promote angiogenesis by activating relevant downstream signaling. Additionally, biglycan binding to EGFR can trigger endosomal uptake mechanisms and further processes. This figure was created with BioRender.com .

2.4. Glycoproteins

Glycoproteins contain a covalent linkage of sugar residues attached by asparaginyl or serinyl residue during the posttranslational modification process. These proteins in bone matrix enhance cell binding and, thus, they are used in various scaffolds for tissue engineering applications. The glycoproteins discussed here are ALP, osteonectin (ON), tetranectin, RGD-containing glycoproteins, thrombospondin, fibronectin (FN), vitonectin (VN), osteopontin (OPN), bone sialoproteins (BSPs), dentin matrix proteins (DMPs), and dentin sialophoshoproteins (DSPPs) [ 35 , 56 ].

2.4.1. ALP

ALP is a prevalent membrane-bound glycoprotein in the placental, germinal, and intestinal tissues as tissue-specific ALP and in the liver, bone, and kidney as tissue-non-specific ALP. In bone, ALP released from either the osteogenic cell surface or matrix vesicles has key roles in the initial stages of hydroxyapatite formation, the deficiency of which causes hypophosphatasia (HPP), namely abnormal mineral deposition. ALP hydrolyzes inorganic pyrophosphate (PPi), increasing the level of inorganic phosphate (Pi) to initiate bone mineralization and adjusting the ratio of PPi to Pi. The sufficient accumulation of calcium ions and Pi within the matrix vesicles forms amorphous calcium phosphate or hydroxyapatite crystals, indicating the initial stage of ECM mineralization. Increased activity of ALP during osteogenesis reveals the differentiation of MSCs into osteoblasts. ALP is controlled by many mechanisms, including signaling pathways (Wnt, BMP-2, FGF, IGFBP/IGF) [ 57 , 58 ]. ALP has been entrapped within a hydrogel consisting of silk fibroin (SF) and a phosphorylated peptide (NapGFFY (NY)) and infused into a rat model. As a result, the mineralized SF gel promoted the osteogenic differentiation of rat BMSCs and regenerated the defective area of the femur in rats [ 59 ]. The deficiency of ALP contributes to a life-threatening perinatal or infantile case resulting from hypomineralization of the skeleton and dental areas. KO ALP mice were treated with AAV8 encoding TNAP-D10 within 5 days postnatally. Plasma ALP activity increased, and the accumulation of PPi was suppressed following treatment. Also, the longevity of treated mice extended compared to control groups. Bone microstructure with a few cortical defects and trabecular defects was similar to the wild type. On top of that, no adverse effects were detected in the kidneys, aorta, coronary arteries, or brain in 70 days postnatally, and there was no sign of rickets in the bowing of long bones, growing epiphyses, or fractures [ 60 ]. Human induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) expressing ALP were evaluated in the treatment of HPP, which indicated that the ALP enzyme activity was enormously elevated in osteoblasts differentiated from these stem cells in vitro, and this was further confirmed with the increased expression of osteoblast biomarkers COL1a1 and OCN [ 61 ]. In clinical applications, asfotase alpha (Strensig®, Alexion, AstraZeneca, Boston, MA, USA) is a first-line approved enzyme replacement therapy for all patients diagnosed with HPP. Asfotase alpha comprises a catalytic domain of human recombinant TNSALP, Fc region of human immunoglobulin G1, and a deca-aspartate peptide (rTNSALP-Fc-deca-aspartate). This deca-aspartate peptide has a high affinity for binding hydroxyapatite. Therefore, the rTNSALP enzyme can be anchored to bone. In the clinical trial NCT02306720 , patients who were administered with asfotase alpha for more than 6 months showed improvement in mobility, physical function, and quality of life during 3 years of follow-ups ( Clinicaltrials.gov , accessed on 20 April 2024) [ 62 ].

2.4.2. Osteonectin

ON containing calcium-binding domains regulates the bone mineralization process, cell cycle, cell-matrix interactions, and cell morphology [NO_PRINTED_FORM]. Besides calcium binding, ON can bind to different collagens (I, III, and V), thrombospondin, and hydroxyapatite via calcium-binding sites with high affinity. ON has been thought to regulate the growth and proliferation of mineral crystals since it can accumulate only in the mineralized matrix and not initiate mineralization, while it can stimulate angiogenesis and the production of MMPs. ON can be induced by growth factors (TGF-b and FGF-2), BMP-2, and glucocorticoids [ 35 , 63 ]. The decreased rate of bone formation in ON-null mice has been related to osteopenia with significant loss of trabecular bone. Moreover, these mice illustrated a reduction in osteoblast and osteoclast surface markers and numbers, indicating decreased bone turnover. The data suggested that a progressive decrease in the number of cells in bone led to osteopenia in ON-null mice, contributing to bone fragility. ON has critical roles in bone remodeling and maintenance of bone mass, which may play roles in inherited susceptibility to OP [ 63 ]. Recent studies revealed that ON bidirectionally regulated the mineralization of osteoblasts with a dose-dependent regulatory effect and activated the p38 pathway via collagens binding to DDR-2 receptors ( Figure 2 ) [ 64 ]. ON activates collagens to bind to DDR-2. With that, collagen synthesis is stimulated, and conformational changes of collagen are induced. Therefore, the activation of DDR-2 can regulate the interactions of cells and ECM via the p38 MAPK pathway. This activation can also trigger pathological changes in chondrocytes and osteoblasts, further resulting in bone formation via the p38 pathway. This pathway was considered as the critical signaling pathway for normal skeletal development [ 64 , 65 , 66 ].

2.4.3. Tetranectin

Tetranectin, a calcium-binding protein from the C-type lectin family, is primarily found in serum and ECM during development, tissue regeneration, and cancer. It can bind to ECM components, including fibrin and plasminogen, stimulating proteolytic activity and growth factors and regulating ECM proteolysis. Normal adult tissue has low levels of tetranectin; however, it decreases in plasma in the case of pathological conditions involving cancer, inflammatory diseases, and coronary artery disease [ 67 ]. In bone, osteoblasts express tetranectin during mineralization. In previous studies, TGFβ was shown to downregulate dexamethasone-induced tetranectin gene expression in osteoblastic cells in vitro. Newborn mice showed tetranectin immune reaction in the newly formed woven bone around the cartilage and along the periosteum, while no activity was observed in the growth plate or surrounding skeletal muscle. Tetranectin was shown to have potential effects on heart failure as a biomarker expressed in the myocardium [ 67 ]. Although the biological function of tetranectin in osteogenesis and chondrogenesis is still unknown, tetranectin–plasminogen activation pathways were shown to inhibit periosteal chondrogenesis and promote periosteal osteogenesis during fracture healing under the administration of inhibitors for plasminogen activators. This inhibition also suppresses the differentiation of MSCs into osteoblasts in mice [ 68 ].

2.5. RGD-Containing Glycoproteins

Bone ECM contains some glycoproteins with RGD amino acid sequences recognized by cell surface markers called integrins. These RGD-containing glycoproteins promote the cell-matrix interactions. Thrombospondin, fibronectin, vitronectin, and a family of small integrin-binding ligand N-linked glycoproteins (SIBLINGs) comprising of osteopontin, BSPs, dentin matrix protein-1, dentin sialophosphoproteins and matrix extracellular phosphoglycoproteins are important biomarkers and each biomarker has been assessed in a variety of diseases, mostly in cancers, such as metastatic bone disease [ 69 ] and breast cancer [ 70 ], and infective diseases [ 71 ].

2.5.1. Thrombospondins

Thrombospondins (TSP1–5) expressed during skeletal development have been shown to bind several matrix proteins, growth factors, and cell surface receptors. TSP4 regulates anti- and pro-angiogenic processes, and TSP1 and -2 act as inhibitors of angiogenesis and modulators of collagen fibrillogenesis in bone and tendon. Apart from that, TSP1 and -2 influence MSC fate and lineage progression, while TSP3, -4, and -5 affect ECM and chondrocyte organization in the growth plate [ 72 ]. Among all TSPs, TSP4 has been found to have critical roles in tissue remodeling, including the initial stage of osteogenesis, mature tenocytes, larval limb development, connective tissues, vasculature, and heart [ 73 , 74 , 75 ]. The deficiency of TSP4 in mice led to the disorganization of collagen fibers in the tendon and disruption in ECM [ 76 ]. Studies showed that TSP4 played an adaptor protein role in ECM assembly. Furthermore, it was upregulated in wound healing and hypertrophic scar formation, as well as collagen I. Thus, TSP4 might be a new target in osteogenic lineage-related diseases.

2.5.2. Fibronectins

Fibronectins (1–3) are among the most prevalent ECM components in bone and many connective tissues. They promote cell adhesion, growth, migration, and differentiation based on the interactions between cells and ECM. Collagens, as stated above, are vital components of ECM, and fibronectin has a high affinity to collagens I and II, as well as binding to heparin and integrin. Besides the other two units binding to collagen collectively, the type 2 unit of fibronectin collagen-binding domain is present in mannose receptors and MMP-2. Interestingly, fibronectin binds to denatured collagens [ 77 , 78 ]. Type 2 fibronectins might be utilized to bind more collagens and provide an adhesive environment for cellular homeostasis. Furthermore, fibronectin matrix assembly is a key factor in mesenchymal cell condensation during chondrogenic development, and impairment of this assembly, along with other transportation genes, results in chondrodysplasias [ 79 ]. Overall, this approach might be beneficial during MSC transplantation. More studies are required to understand the efficiency of this approach.

2.5.3. Vitronectin

Another abundant glycoprotein found in serum, ECM, and bone is vitronectin, which promotes cell adhesion, spreading, and migration. A new vitronectin-derived peptide, VnP-16 (RVYFFKGKQYWE), was evaluated in bone loss induced by ovariectomy in mice, in which VnP-16 accelerated osteoblast differentiation and activity via β1 integrin receptors/focal adhesion kinase (FAK) signaling, thus promoting bone formation. VnP-16 was also shown to inhibit bone resorption by suppressing Janus N-terminal kinase (JNK)-c-Fos-NFATc1 (NFATc1; nuclear factor of activated T cells cytoplasmic 1) and αvβ3 integrin-c-Src-PYK2 (PYK; proline-rich tyrosine kinase-2) signaling. Therefore, osteoclast differentiation was negatively regulated. The anabolic effect of VnP-16 on osteoblast differentiation and expansion increased bone regeneration while significantly alleviating pro-inflammatory cytokine-induced bone resorption via blocking osteoclast differentiation and function in mice, which resulted in reversed ovariectomy-induced bone loss [ 80 ]. Additionally, human MSCs were shown to adhere to ECM proteins with varying affinity via distinct integrin receptors. Although fibronectin was considered to have the highest affinity (fibronectin, collagen I, collagen IV, vitronectin, and laminin 1, respectively), the osteogenic differentiation occurred in cells cultured on vitronectin and collagen I, not others. Here, vitronectin and collagen I induced osteogenic differentiation of human MSCs [ 81 ].

2.5.4. Osteopontin

Osteopontin (OPN), a secreted phosphoprotein (SPP), is a SIBLINGs family member with an RGD sequence and modulates cell adhesion via autocrine and paracrine factors. Although OPN was considered only in ECM of bone, it was detected in dentin, cartilage, kidney, and vascular tissues with specific roles, such as acting as a structural molecule and a cytokine to mediate cellular communications. The RGD domain allows it to bind to αvβ1, αvβ3, αvβ5, α4β1, α5β1, and α9β1 integrins in many cell types: leukocytes, epithelial cells, smooth muscle cells, etc. [ 35 , 82 ]. In a study, OPN was analyzed regarding the origin, in which tumor-derived OPN was primarily soluble and did not support the proliferation of endothelial cells and prevent their apoptosis without adhesion. Hence, OPN might have different structures and functions in cells originating from other organs [ 83 ]. OPN has a high affinity to αvβ3 integrins and CD44 receptors in the attachment of osteoclasts to bone ECM, by which OPN regulates proliferation, differentiation, inflammation, metabolism, and tumor metastasis in chondrocytes, osteoblasts, osteoclast synoviocytes, and MSCs. It has roles in cartilage maintenance and subchondral bone homeostasis to regulate ECM, affecting bone turnover, bone mineral density (BMD), morphological formation, and reconstruction. The occurrence and development of many bone-related diseases, such as OP and OA, are associated with OPN. Additionally, an increase in OPN contributed to low BMD and OP, the level of which in serum has been correlated with the severity of OP and provided an early diagnosis of the disease [ 84 ]. OA is a complicated disorder involving excessive immune reactions. OPN is also a biomarker for OA affecting joints and surrounding tissues. It might regulate the degenerations in articular cartilage by modulating the expression of MMP-13, digesting type II collagen, and degrading GAGs. With the administration of OPN, OA-related cartilage inflammation decreased, which was found to be associated with the ERK1/2 pathway [ 85 , 86 ].

2.5.5. Bone Sialoproteins

Bone sialoproteins (BSPs) accumulate in cement lines and fill the gaps between mineralized collagen fibrils, which are present in bone, dentin, cementum, and hypertrophic chondrocytes. The expression of BSPs is high in osteoblasts, osteoclasts, osteocytes, and chondrocytes [ 35 ]. They may have roles in mediating the early stage of matrix mineralization and the late stage of osteogenic differentiation, and they show high binding affinity to calcium. Furthermore, the level of BSPs influences the mineralization of the bone matrix. In addition, BSPs affect the proliferation and expansion of osteoblastic phenotype from BM. Overexpressed BSPs accelerate the matrix mineralization, whereas reduced levels result in poor mineralization. This can be explained by their binding affinity to type I collagen [ 87 ].

2.5.6. Dentin Matrix Proteins

Dentin matrix proteins (DMPs) are a group of SIBLINGs that modulate cell attachment, proliferation, differentiation, and matrix mineralization of dentin and bone. Four types exist (DMP1, DMP2, dentin sialoprotein (DSP), and DMP4). DMP1 is a highly phosphorylated type with a strong affinity to bind calcium. Moreover, the N-telopeptide of the α1 chain of type I collagen carries the binding site of DMP1. DMP1 binds the gap regions presented in collagen fibrils, and N-telopeptide is in these regions. The binding of DMP1 to N-telopeptide in the gap regions facilitates the nucleation of hydroxyapatite and polymerization of collagen during tissue calcification. Namely, DMP1 is considered a nucleator of hydroxyapatite formation, indicating that DMP1 and collagen interaction might initiate the mineralization process [ 88 ]. The inactivation of DMP1 upregulates FGF receptor signaling in osteocytes, which results in excessive production of FGF23 in X-linked hypophosphatemic rickets (XLH) and autosomal recessive hypophosphatemic rickets type 1 in humans and mice. For instance, burosumab-twza (Crysvita®) neutralizing monoclonal antibodies (anti-FGF23) was the first approved treatment for adults and children with XLH (for the age of 1 year old and older) and tumor-induced osteomalacia [ 89 , 90 ].

2.5.7. Dentin sialophosphoprotein

Dentin sialophosphoprotein (DSPP), described as enhancing nucleation and growth of hydroxyapatite, is cleaved into two proteins: dentin sialoprotein (DSP) and dentin phosphoprotein (DPP). In a study, DSPP-null mice reflected a similar phenotype of human autosomal dominant dentinogenesis imperfecta [ 91 ]. DPP alone was thought to initiate and maturate dentin mineralization. To confirm, DSPP-null mice were genetically modified to express DPP only (not DSP), and the conditional DPP KO mice were generated in that background. DPP expression partially corrected predentin width, and the phenotype was partially ameliorated. On top of that, irregular unmineralized areas in dentin disappeared. Although a significant recovery was detected in dentin volume, no change occurred in the dentin mineral density. In conclusion, DPP was found to be involved in the maturation of dentin mineralization, while DSP initiated the dentin mineralization [ 92 ].

2.6. Gla-Containing Proteins

Gla-containing proteins are posttranslationally modified by vitamin K-dependent enzymes, including osteocalcin (OCN) and matrix Gla protein. OCN, known as γ-carboxyglutamic acid-containing protein secreted by osteoblasts, is the most prevalent non-collagenous protein in bone (~25% of non-collagenous matrix protein) and regulates cartilage calcification. Carboxylation of OCN occurs in osteoblasts before their release into the bone ECM. However, both carboxylated and non-carboxylated forms of OCN can be present in the circulation, which is in close connection with energy and glucose metabolism [ 93 ], as well as bone metabolism to confirm osteoblastic activity as a biomarker. The carboxylation status of OCN affects its formation and structure in the skeleton and its function in the endocrine system regarding energy metabolism. Also, it regulates the stability and binding potential of OCN via its cellular G-protein coupled receptor-6A (GPCR6A) receptors. While tricarboxylated OCN has a function in the configuration of ECM, undecarboxylated ones regulate hormonal functions. Also, the carboxylation degree determines OCN’s interactions with Ca 2+ [ 94 ]. Posttranslational modifications of OCN are regulated by vitamin K-dependent carboxylation of glutamate residues into highly Ca-binding Gla residues, and carboxylated, undecarboxylated, and undercarboxylated OCNs are circulated in the bloodstream. Hence, OCN directly regulates the insulin-responsive glucose transport system in myocytes and adipocytes and increases insulin sensitivity [ 95 ]. OCN is thought to have a high affinity to the mineral component of bone due to its acidic character, which binds to the calcium of hydroxyapatite to regulate the growth of mineral composition in bone. Its binding to hydroxyapatite accelerates the nucleation of the hydroxyapatite and functions in cell signaling and the recruitment of osteoclasts and osteoblasts. In MSCs, loss and rescue of OCN and OPN were found to modulate osteogenic and angiogenic features of these cells along with matrix integrity and mineral quality. The loss of OPN and OCN in MSCs of mice led to the involvement of ECM integrity and maturation as well as an unexpected increase in GAG composition associated with skeletal connective tissues, resulting in a delay in the maturation of mineral content. Treating these MSC cultures with OPN and OCN supplements rescued their proliferation, osteogenic potential, matrix integrity, and mineral quality [ 96 ]. Matrix Gla protein (MGP), a vitamin K-dependent protein, is more prevalent in cartilage than in bone, and its expression begins in the early stage of development and remains at the same level throughout life [ 35 ]. MGP undergoes two posttranslational modifications to function: phosphorylation and carboxylation, and all these isotypes are present in the circulation. The disruption of MGP function results in failure in the anti-calcification process in the vasculature, particularly resulting in coronary artery diseases [ 97 ]. This protein is highly expressed at the cellular level in MSCs, vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs), and chondrocytes [ 97 ]. MGP, a secreted extracellular protein, has a high binding affinity for calcium, phosphate ions, and hydroxyapatite. MGP is an essential target in low bone mass-related diseases, which regulates osteoclast differentiation and function because bone resorption is maintained by osteoclast activity [ 98 ]. The inhibition of calcification occurs in many ways: direct inhibition of calcium phosphate precipitation, the formation of matrix vesicles, the formation of apoptotic bodies, and trans-differentiation of VSMCs. Although their mechanisms of action remain unclear, they are considered involved in the functional inhibition of BMP-2 and BMP-4 since they block calcium crystal deposition and shield calcification [ 97 ]. Lastly, the silencing of MGP elevates intracellular Ca 2+ flux [ 98 ].

2.7. Plasma Membrane Proteins

2.7.1. Adhesion Molecules

Evidence suggests that chondrocytes interact with the ECM through adhesion molecules [ 99 ]. Among others, the integrin α1β1 is a well-known protein leading to chondrocyte and collagens II, IV, and VI, matrilin-1, as well as laminin-1 interactions [ 99 , 100 ]. Interestingly, integrin α1β1 is overexpressed during early OA, protecting against posttraumatic OA [ 101 ]. Similar findings have been described for β2 integrins [ 102 ]. For example, integrin β1 can be expressed in chondrocytes in different zones of bone, which triggers the inhibition of integrin-mediated signal transduction and thus stimulates chondrogenesis. However, the expression of this integrin in diseases like OA was significantly downregulated. In other words, integrin β1 functions as a protector against arthritis [ 103 ]. The expression or conformational regulations of different integrins in the cell surface are associated with pathological conditions. In OA, alterations in subchondral bone microarchitecture abnormally increase the αV integrin-mediated activation of TGFβ in articular cartilage chondrocytes. Furthermore, the severity of TGFβ activation is aligned with mechanical stress distribution. This excessive activation of TGFβ results in cartilage degeneration in OA mice. This activation can be suppressed by the natural binding of arginylglycylaspartic acid (RGD) peptide ligand. Overall, all these processes are stimulated by mechanical stress, and the increased severity of this stress strongly connects αV and RGD sequences to mediate excessive TGFβ activation via cell contractile forces [ 104 ].

2.7.2. Ion Channels

Although chondrocytes are not excitable cells, like neurons, ion channels play critical roles in non-excitable cells to keep their homeostasis ( Figure 4 ). Ion channels are pore-forming transmembrane proteins that regulate membrane potential maintenance through ion transport [ 105 ]. They are crucial for cell homeostasis, including resting potential maintenance and signal transduction, and can be classified into voltage- and ligand-gated channels [ 106 , 107 ]. The ionic microenvironment in cartilage is a cation-rich place primarily represented by sodium (Na + ), calcium (Ca 2+ ), and potassium (K + ) due to the presence of large amounts of negatively charged proteoglycans [ 108 , 109 ]. Such ions are well-known to regulate cell proliferation and differentiation in chondrocytes. In fact, electrophysiological recording using whole-cell patch clamp experiments demonstrated that pharmacologically induced depolarization by blocking of voltage-gated potassium (Kv) via tetraethylammonium avoids cartilage synthesis in chondrogenic cells by impaired intracellular Ca 2+ ([Ca 2+ ] i ) oscillation [ 108 ], suggesting pivotal roles of calcium-permeable channels.

Calcium channels have been implicated in several cartilage-related diseases. For instance, in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), a common autoimmune disease causing cartilage damage [ 110 ], the acid-sensitive channels [ 111 ], transient receptor potential channels [ 112 ], P2X7 receptors [ 113 ], and Piezo channels [ 114 ], among others, have been involved in RA pathogenesis by the regulation of calcium ion-related signaling pathways, which results in synovial hyperplasia, structural damage, and inflammatory burst [ 110 ]. Notably, the Piezo channels, which are permeable to monovalent (i.e., Na + , K + ) and divalent (i.e., Mn 2+ , Ca 2+ ) ions gated by mechanical forces [ 115 ], were initially reported in the plasma membrane of chondrocytes by Lee et al., 2014 [ 116 ]. In elegant experiments, the authors found that induced mechanical injury on articular chondrocytes leads to the Piezo channel activation, which seems to act in conjunction with L-type voltage-gated Ca 2+ channels (VDCCs) for [Ca 2+ ] i mobilization. The L-type VDCC is well-known to regulate chondrocyte-related cell processes in the growth plate and cartilage regions [ 117 , 118 ]. Interestingly, mechanical injury-induced chondrocyte death was prevented by blocking Piezo channels with GsMTx4 [ 116 ], a spider venom peptide that inhibits cationic mechanosensitive channels [ 119 ]. Although those results suggested a pathological role of Piezo channels in the pathogenesis of RA through the induction of chondrocyte apoptosis [ 110 ], a recent study conducted by Hendrickx et al., 2020 revealed a dual role for these channels [ 120 ] since their lack caused severe early-onset OP with spontaneous fractures in mice as well as an impaired endochondral ossification [ 120 ]. Piezo channel activation was found to be strongly associated with BM MSC differentiation into osteoblasts; chondrocytes to promote apoptosis and endochondral ossification; osteoblasts to promote bone formation, to reduce proliferation, and inhibit bone resorption by osteoclasts; osteocytes to promote bone formation [ 121 ]. Although Piezo1 could be a potential target for cartilage diseases, its modulation should be performed carefully.

Another well-characterized calcium channel in chondrocytes is the large conductance Ca 2+ -activated K + (BK Ca ) channel, which is encoded by the KCa1.1 gene [ 109 , 122 ]. BK Ca are channels activated by either membrane depolarization or [Ca 2+ ] i elevation, resulting in K + efflux and membrane hyperpolarization [ 123 ]. Paxilline blocking of BK Ca channels results in overexpression of RUNX2, a transcription factor involved in the development and maintenance of the bone, as well as an increased migration pattern of chondrogenic progenitor cells, suggesting that modulation of BK Ca regulates cell properties in chondrogenic lineages [ 124 ]. Interestingly, BK Ca channels have shown differential expression patterns in pathological states such as OA [ 124 ]. For instance, KCNMA1 is overexpressed in OA chondrocytes, and it has also been established that cytokines such as IL-1β and TNFβ lead to KCNMA1 overexpression in OA cartilage [ 125 ], suggesting that pro-inflammatory events could modulate BK Ca channels.

Finally, early works showed that chondrocytes require glutamate for their proliferation in an N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptor-dependent way [ 126 ]. Most recently, Matta et al. (2019) supported such initial observations and determined that NMDAR-mediated calcium signaling is pivotal for proliferation and ECM synthesis in early states [ 126 ]. Differential NMDA isoform expression patterns are detected in OA chondrocytes [ 127 ], and it has been observed that IL-1β leads to NMDA activation [ 128 ].

Despite the evident compromise of ion channels in cartilage-related therapies and their potential pharmacological modulation, they are poorly explored in severe chronic entities such as metabolic diseases affecting bone. Novel approaches to elucidate the expression pattern of ion channels will surely help to better understand the natural history of those diseases and attempt new treatments targeting such channels.

2.7.3. G-Protein Coupled Receptors (GPCRs)

GPCRs are the largest receptors in eukaryotes and lead to the transduction of hundreds of signals [ 129 ]. GPCRs comprise a single polypeptide folded into a globular shape, forming seven segments on the plasma membrane with loops in the extracellular and cytoplasmatic faces [ 129 ]. Those receptors are attached to G-proteins, which bind nucleotides guanosine triphosphate (GTP) or guanosine diphosphate (GDP). Currently, four G-protein families are described [ 130 ]: Gs, which activates adenyl cyclase; Gi, which inhibits adenyl cyclase; Gq/11, which is involved in IP3 and diacylglycerol, intracellular calcium mobilization, and protein kinase C activation; G12/13, which is associated with rho GTPase.

GPCRs have been implied in several physiological events of chondrocytes. For instance, chondrocyte differentiation is partially attained through G-protein signaling modulation via the parathyroid hormone receptor (PPR) [ 131 ]. The PPR activates two stimulatory G-protein α-subunits, Gqα and G11α G-proteins [ 132 ]. In this regard, the Gαs seem to be a critical regulator of chondrocyte differentiation through their negative regulation. Mutations in the GNAS gene, which encodes for Gαs, leads to Albright hereditary osteodystrophy, a rare disease characterized by growth abnormalities due to the acceleration of chondrocyte differentiation and interruption of longitudinal bone growth in those patients [ 133 , 134 ]. Similar findings were also reported by Chagin et al., 2014 by using GNAS −/− mice, in which authors showed severe growth retardation in the animals, as compared to wild type, due to an increase in chondrocyte differentiation and apoptosis but not in proliferation [ 133 ]. Gqα and G11α prevent chondrocyte apoptosis upon Gα ablation [ 131 ].

As with PPR, many other GPCRs such as prostaglandins [ 135 ], the RDC1 receptor [ 136 ], β-adrenergic receptors [ 137 ], and histamine H2 receptors [ 138 ], among others, have been described in chondrocytes and could have important roles in chondrocyte physiology, since they can also activate Gαs. Those receptors could be potential targets for treating diseases affecting chondrocytes. Indeed, it was also reported by Carlson et al., 2021 that pharmacological inhibition of GPCR kinase 2 via paroxetine, a classical anti-depressant, abated OA progression and promoted cartilage regeneration in an OA mouse model [ 139 ], supporting that GPCRs could be an interesting target for chondrocyte modulation. Several GPCR-modulating drugs are currently approved by the Food and Drug Administration [ 140 ].

2.7.4. Wnt Signal and LRP

The Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway is a well-conserved pathway involved in bone formation and bone remodeling through the interaction of WNT molecules and the coreceptor LRP5/6, which leads to the β-catenin reaching the nucleus due to its association with the transcription factor Tcf/Lef to promote cell proliferation ( Figure 5 ) [ 141 , 142 ]. LRPs are low-density lipoprotein receptors distributed in the plasma membrane of several cells, including chondrocytes [ 142 ]. ST and Dkk-1 (Wnt inhibitor proteins) can bind LRP 5/6 [ 143 ]. SOST expression has been reported in chondrocytes of the growth plate from biopsies of patients with OA [ 144 ]. The deficiency of LRP5 (loss of function) causes osteoporosis–pseudoglioma (OPPG), while the impaired SOST stimulates bone formation in mice and humans. The SOST gene encodes sclerostin (bone formation inhibitor) binding to LRP5/6 Wnt coreceptors, regulating bone formation. Thus, patients with OPPG resulting from loss of function in the LRP5 gene should be administered with an antagonist of SOST/sclerostin action, while the inhibitors of WNT signaling may hinder the overgrowth of bone in SOST deficiency-related sclerosing diseases [ 145 ]. Romosozumab, a humanized neutralizing monoclonal antibody (anti-sclerostin), is an approved treatment for postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. This anabolic treatment increases bone formation and reduces bone resorption. In the clinical trial NCT01575834 , the romosozumab treatment lowered the risk of clinical fracture by 73% compared to the placebo group [ 146 ].

Several chondrocyte-related diseases are characterized by pro-inflammatory events [ 147 ]. Thus, potential receptor regulation is feasible. In this scenario, it was previously demonstrated that IL-1β increases the LPR5 expression in human and mouse OA chondrocytes, which potentiates the Wnt/β-catenin signaling and the synthesis of matrix metalloproteinase-13 (MMP-13) by promoting cartilage destruction [ 148 ]. Thus, LPR5 could be a potential target for treating bone-related therapies.

On the other hand, LRP1 is a chondrocyte receptor involved in the regulation of a disintegrin and metalloproteinase with thrombospondin motifs 5 (ADAMTS-5), the major aggrecan-degrading enzyme in cartilage, through their LRP-mediated endocytosis [ 149 ]. Interestingly, this process is dysregulated during OA, promoting the increased extracellular levels of ADAMTS-5, leading to the loss of aggrecan and collagen fibrils due to an apparent downregulation in the LRP1 translation [ 150 ]. LRP1 also binds ADAMTS-4 and -5 and MMP-13 [ 149 , 151 ]. Consequently, potential strategies targeting the restoration of LRP1 in the chondrocyte plasma membrane to physiological levels could propose novel alternatives for diseases such as OA. Figure 5 Wnt signaling pathways in bone metabolic processes [ 152 , 153 , 154 ]. The figure shows that the canonical ( left panel) and non-canonical ( right panel) Wnt signaling pathways regulate different metabolic processes in bone, including bone development, skeletal homeostasis, and regulation of bone mineral density. In the canonical state, Wnt binds to LRP5/6 and FZD receptors to recruit dishevelled (DVL) and Axin that stabilize β-catenin cytoplasm. Then, nucleus-translocated β-catenin binds to transcriptional proteins for the transcription of related genes. This pathway cooperatively works with BMPs. β-catenin/TCF-4 binding transactivates BMP-2 transcription via TCF/LEF response element in the BMP-2 promoter. Wnt and BMP cascades are individual mechanisms by which bone formation and resorption are regulated. Wnt signaling regulates the differentiation of pluripotent MSCs into osteoprogenitor cells, while the BMP pathway stimulates these progenitor cells into mature osteoblasts. Afterward, Wnt signaling cooperates with BMP to promote osteoblast differentiation (bone formation), whereas osteoblast-derived Wnt-5a signaling activates the non-canonical cascade in osteoclasts to stimulate their differentiation (bone resorption). An increase in ALP activity and mineralization is a sign of this process [ 155 , 156 ]. On the other hand, the activation of Fzd/Ror/Ryk receptors via non-canonical Wnt binding recruits DVL. With that, heterotrimeric G-protein (Gq) activates PLC, breaking down phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (PIP2) into IP3 and DAG (second messengers). IP3 stimulates Ca 2+ release signaling in ER and activates several mechanisms, while DAG promotes the activation of PKC. By depicting the non-canonical pathway, we emphasize that Ca 2+ is an important component of the hypertrophic stage. Ca 2+ is prepared via two mechanisms: extracellular Ca 2+ influx and release from ER storage. When Ca 2+ in cytoplasm binds to calmodulin (CaM), Ca 2+ /calmodulin-dependent protein kinase (CaMKII) is auto-phosphorylated. Therefore, hypertrophy of chondrocytes is derepressed by the activation of CaMKII phosphorylating histone deacetylase 4 (HDAC4). Another protein called 14-3-3 binds to HDCA4, blocks the translocation of HDCA4, and stimulates transportation of nuclear HDCA4 into cytoplasm. Hence, HDCA4 activity is suppressed, and hypertrophy-related genes in chondrocytes are transcriptionally activated. Furthermore, the histone deacetylation via HDCA4 prevents RUNX2 (one of the hypertrophic transcription factors) [ 152 , 153 ]. This figure was created with BioRender.com .

3. Inorganic Component of Bone and Targeted Drug Delivery

The major inorganic component of hard tissues, including bone and dentine, is hydroxyapatite, which occurs via biomineralization, in which minerals and ECM interact. The deposition of hydroxyapatite is provided by collagen, acting as a template for mineralization [ 56 ]. As a therapeutic target, hydroxyapatite is highlighted for drug targeting and has been widely evaluated in many clinical settings.

3.1. Bisphosphonate

Bisphosphonates (BPs) have been investigated in many bone-related diseases, such as Paget’s disease, OP, metastatic bone disease, and various rare bone disorders, as well as in non-skeletal diseases. In bone, BPs have a high affinity to hydroxyapatite; however, this binding varies based on mineral deposition sites. In other words, newly deposited mineral sites in osteoid are most likely preferred by BPs, followed by resorption sites and bone turnover sites [ 157 ]. BPs are resistant to hydrolysis due to their pyrophosphate analogs, by which they gain anti-osteoclastic activity, thereby preserving bone mineral density. BPs inhibit calcification and hydroxyapatite breakdown, resulting in bone resorption suppression. Briefly, BPs contain two side chains on the phosphate–carbon–phosphate backbone: R1, where the affinity to bone is determined, and R2, where the potency of BPs is present. Nitrogen determines the potency of BPs, and the nitrogen side chains directly bind to the hydroxyl groups on the hydroxyapatite, increasing the affinity. Nitrogen-containing BPs (e.g., zoledronate, alendronate, etc.) are more potent than others (e.g., clodronate, etidronate, etc.). Nitrogen-containing R2 chains are positively charged, and binding them to the hydroxyapatite surface turns the surface charge into a more positive potential. These changes attract more negatively charged phosphonate groups and thus enhance the binding affinity. Furthermore, the structure of nitrogen in R2 influences the degree of anti-resorption activity. For instance, risedronate is the most potent due to the heterocyclic nitrogen ring [ 158 , 159 ].

The mechanism of action of BPs at the cellular level begins with their binding to osteoclasts (entering bone), which inhibits the prenylation of small GTPases and triggers apoptosis of osteoclasts while preventing the apoptosis of osteoblasts and osteocytes. Osteoclasts engulf BP in large quantities and non-resorbing cells in small quantities, which are released to become available for natural desorption [ 160 , 161 ]. The distribution of BPs is not homogeneous in the skeleton due to the surface area of cortical and trabecular bone, in which trabecular bone takes up more BPs resulting from high bone turnover. Locally increased bone turnover in metastatic bone diseases or Pagetic lesions contributed to high BP binding. To detect the binding of BPs, technetium-99m (99mTc) was bound to BP with an ionic bond. Bone scanning data indicate positive bone metastasis at lytic and blastic sites but were negative in lytic lesions from multiple myeloma. In these cases, BP binding has been considered to correlate with three phenomena: ALP activity, newly deposited mineral availability, and disassociation of bonds between 99mTc and BP at osteolytic sites due to the acidic environment [ 157 ]. In another study, measurement of tibia, rib, and vertebrae confirmed that the fluorescence-tagged low-affinity BPs penetrated deeper than high-affinity ones. BPs were found to have high intensity in endocortical surfaces and haversian canals, whereas low intensity was found in canaliculi and osteocyte lacunae [ 162 ].

BPs are shown to bind plasma proteins in the bloodstream depending on pH, calcium, and species, including dogs, mice, etc. BPs rapidly disappear in circulation and mostly reach the bone due to their strong affinity to hydroxyapatite [ 163 ]. The liver is another organ where BPs are detected following oral and parenteral administration. However, to date, BPs have been described as transforming intracellularly to cytotoxic ATP analogs of non-nitrogen-containing BPs, which inhibits bone resorption. Renal clearance also affects drugs like BPs when reaching hard tissues, which correlates closely with creatinine clearance [ 157 ]. That is why patients whose creatinine clearance is below 30-35 mL/min are not approved for BP treatments [ 164 ]. Zoledronate is one of the BPs that are used for the treatment of bone resorptive diseases such as OP and osteoporotic fractures [ 165 ], and it has an adverse effect called acute kidney injury. In a study, 4405 patients who underwent zoledronate in five years were analyzed regarding creatinine levels after treatment. Both creatinine and glomerular filtration were significant factors in predicting acute kidney injury within 14 days; however, the recommended creatinine cut-off level (35 mL/min) showed a low sensitivity, but glomerular filtration was a good predictor. Therefore, the study suggested infusing zoledronate over 30 min in a patient with glomerular filtration less than 50 mL/min/1.73 m 2 for the treatment of OP [ 164 ]. Another commonly used BP in bone targeting is alendronate, which is evaluated in many metastatic cancers (lung, breast, primary bone, and metastatic bone cancers) and bone-related diseases (OP) [ 166 ]. Modified nanoparticles with alendronate have been assessed for the treatment of OP regarding drug release behavior, cytotoxicity, and affinity to hydroxyapatite in vitro. These negatively charged nanoparticles showed sustained release of alendronate, good cytocompatibility, and blood biocompatibility with low hemolysis ratios (<5%), as well as exhibited a strong binding ratio to hydroxyapatite compared to nanoparticles with no alendronate [ 167 ]. Many drugs for bone treatment mainly target (1) bone resorption inhibitors, including BPs, estrogen and estrogen-related modulators, and calcitonin; (2) bone formation promoters like parathyroid hormone analogs; (3) vitamin K, vitamin D, etc. [ 168 ]. When taking the adverse effects (osteonecrosis of the jaw, synovitis, arthritis, etc.) of drugs into account, the development of new carriers is an urgent need. Wang et al. isolated extracellular vesicles from mouse MSCs and modified them with alendronate (Ale-EVs) for OP therapy. Modified Ale-EVs were infused into ovariectomy-induced OP rats to confirm their anti-OP effects. In vitro data showed a high binding affinity to hydroxyapatite. Compared to EV alone, Ale-EVs induced strong fluorescence in bone. Concerning the treatment point, Ale-EVs induced the growth and differentiation of mouse MSCs and ameliorated OP in ovariectomy-induced osteoporotic rats without any side effects [ 168 ].

3.2. Tetracyclines

Tetracyclines (TCs) are a class of broad-spectrum antibiotics targeting Gram-negative/positive bacteria and other intracellular bacteria such as Rickettsia and Chlamydia . However, recognizing their binding affinity to bone with a high turnover rate provided a new bone targeting strategy. The mechanism of action has shown that TC chelates the bond between oxygen atoms of TC and calcium of hydroxyapatite [ 169 ]. There are several types of tetracyclines based on their chemical structures and clinical uses: tetracycline, minocycline, doxycycline, tigecycline, omadacycline, eravacycline, and sarecycline. Several studies showed the bone-targeting properties of TCs in mice, rats, guinea pigs, rabbits, and dogs, in which a high fluorescence was detected in long and flat bones. Furthermore, administration sites of tetracycline and gender did not affect TC-induced bone fluorescence in both animal models and human trials [ 170 ]. TCs are evaluated in many bone-related diseases under several translational and clinical conditions. To treat osteoarticular tuberculosis, TC-modified nanoparticles were developed to deliver the anti-tubercular drug (rifapentine) into bone. After producing and confirming the effectiveness of TC nanoparticles in vitro, mice were intravenously injected with these nanoparticles to assess pharmacokinetics and biodistribution. The release of rifapentine from TC nanoparticles took more than 60 h, and 68% of TC nanoparticles could bind the hydroxyapatite in vitro. The drug concentration in bone from mice treated with TC nanoparticles was significantly higher than in control groups with no toxicity.

As a result, rifapentine-loaded TC nanoparticles are a potential treatment that increases the drug concentration in bone and anti-tuberculosis activity, sustaining drug release and reducing dose [ 171 ]. TC-grafted mPEG-PLGA micelles were used to deliver astragaloside IV (AS) for osteoporotic improvement in rats. Besides their high uptake and fewer cytotoxic effects, they showed high binding affinity to hydroxyapatite. The ovariectomized female rats were injected with TC-mPEG-PLGA and mPEG-PLGA alone; TC-mPEG-PLGA was accumulated more in bone than mPEG-PLGA. Furthermore, the histopathological analysis indicated a thickened epiphyses line, regularly arranged trabecular bone with significance, and consistent bone mineral density value compared to untreated groups. Therefore, TC-mPEG-PLGA enhanced the anti-osteoporotic effect of AS in bone. In conclusion, TC-mPEG-PLGA promoted the absorption of AS due to the high diffusion and permeability provided by TC [ 172 ]. TCs (yellow fluorescent) have also been used in Streptococcus mutans (S. mutans) -induced bone loss as a fluorescent reagent in the measurement of bone formation activity in mice as compared to alizarin (red fluorescent)-injected and calcein (green fluorescent)-injected control groups [ 173 ]. The measurement of bone formation activity is exploited by a fluorescent reagent deposited on the calcification front, and the distance between two fluorescent labels of TC is determined at different time points (bone histomorphometry analysis) [ 174 ]. S. mutans, a TC-sensitive oral cavity bacterium, was intravenously inoculated into the mouse tail vein, followed by TC injections. MicroCT results showed a significant and apparent reduction following bacterial inoculation in bone mineral density of distal femurs regardless of injected fluorescent reagent. No significant differences existed between the TC–alizarin double-injected mice and the calcein–alizarin double-injected mice. One-time injection of TC neither affected bone microarchitecture nor ameliorated the alterations in bone mineral density in the S. mutans -induced bone loss model. Hence, TCs could potentially measure bone formation activity in the same way as non-antibiotic fluorescent reagents [ 173 ]. Furthermore, it was demonstrated that the administration of TCs inhibited osteoclastic activities by inhibiting MMP-9-mediated histone H3 cleavages, which alleviated bone resorption and induced the differentiation of osteoblasts. MMPs are inhibited through chelating Ca 2+ and Zn 2+ . Acid production and secretion of lysosomal cysteine proteases are also inhibited by TCs [ 175 , 176 ]. Although TCs have been shown to have excellent properties for bone-targeting applications as guides for nanocarriers or drugs, their low chemical stability in different conjugation strategies may result in less optimal ligands for bone delivery [ 159 ]. Additionally, TCs were shown to promote osteogenic differentiation through different mechanisms. Tetracycline and doxycycline function under Wnt signaling while minocycline and sarecycline were found to be closely associated with Hedgehog signaling [ 177 ]. On the other hand, TCs inhibit osteoclast differentiation by suppressing MMP-9-mediated histone H3 cleavage through tigecycline and minocycline, which are potent inhibitors of MMP-9. Also, the administration of these TCs showed better outcomes in osteoporotic mice.

3.3. Acidic Amino Acid Oligopeptides

Acidic oligopeptides contain aspartic acid (Asp) or glutamic acid (Glu) residues in which the negative charge and polarity of side groups provide the binding affinity to calcium ions. Moreover, this affinity changed based on the type of polymeric amide bond and the number of amino acid residues. As the polymer chain becomes longer, the affinity and disassociation constant (Kd) increase, which enhances the binding affinity. Nevertheless, conjugating these peptides to the vectors requires some regulations: the size of the vector to be absorbed, ~6–8 repeated amino acids, the spatial configurations, and side chains [ 159 ]. As stated above, osteopontin and bone sialoproteins binding to hydroxyapatite include a repeated sequence of Asp and Glu. The number of residues of these amino acids exploits the affinity of molecules to hydroxyapatite. Even though isoform L-peptides or D-peptides do not determine this affinity, D-peptides provide advantages due to their compatibility with bone and low immune system recognition. A study stated that the hemopexin-like domain is a preferential site of Ca 2+ binding, and hydroxyapatite has this site to bind these ions with four Asp carboxylate groups. Furthermore, calcium-binding was emphasized and mediated by carboxylate oxygens and carboxylate-rich matrix proteins (OCN, OPN, collagen, and tricarboxylate molecule citrate). All these molecules selectively bind to hydroxyapatite and increase the bone volume. In this regard, vitronectin was shown to bind both soluble Ca 2+ and hydroxyapatite with high affinity and chemical selectivity. The average Kd was 27 ± 1.5uM [ 178 ]. To date, these peptides have been used for the delivery of enzymes, hormones, antibiotics, small interfering RNA (siRNA), and gene therapy.

In conclusion, the addition of high-affinity molecules to hydroxyapatite should improve current delivery and targeting strategies. Targeting newly formed hydroxyapatite and releasing drug/viral agents in such regions may provide new alternatives to access inside cells. To succeed, it is critical to find a better route to infuse such drugs at the beginning of development.

3.4. Aptamers

Aptamers are short single-stranded nucleic acid (20–100 bases) molecules that interact with various proteins, cells, and small molecules, which can be used alone or multivalently [ 179 , 180 ]. Aptamers show strong chemical stability and can be rapidly produced on a large scale, and a variety of aptamer combinations can be made [ 179 ]. Furthermore, multivalent interactions of these oligonucleotides utilize viral entry, cell–cell and host–pathogen interactions, etc. Thus, molecular recognition-based applications of aptamers are highlighted as a promising targeted drug delivery method with a cost-effective and accessible perspective [ 181 ]. Compared to siRNA and oligonucleotide concepts, aptamers bind with high affinity and specificity to the protein targets. The binding sites of aptamers contain clefts and grooves of targeted molecules, which provide them with antagonistic activity. These agents show structural stability under different temperatures and storage conditions and can be chemically synthesized. Their strong chemical stability and rapid production give them several advantages over traditional approaches such as antibodies. Furthermore, aptamers can bind in many ways, which is superior to antibodies [ 179 ]. Increased aptamer concentrations in local administrations trigger higher interactions of aptamers and cell surface ligands. The binding of an aptamer to its ligand increases the affinity of other nearby aptamers to those specific targets. However, nucleases rapidly cleave these oligonucleotides, particularly in monomeric form [ 180 ]. Skeletal diseases are major clinical challenges to overcome due to various factors discussed in this review. Aptamers, in this regard, were found to be a critical mediator of targeted therapies since they can be attached to nanoparticles [ 182 ], viral vectors [ 183 ], exosomes from BM-derived MSCs [ 184 ], and proteins [ 185 ]. An osteoblast-binding aptamer, CH6, attached to lipid nanoparticles encapsulating Plekho1 siRNA (CH6-LNP-siRNA) targeting casein kinase-2 interacting protein-1 (CKIP-1) and increased cellular uptake and bone distribution compared to LNP-siRNA in osteopenic rodents. Here, targeting CKIP-1, a negative regulator of bone formation, is triggered only to form new bone, not bone resorption. CH6-functionalized lipid nanoparticles were taken up through micropinocytosis, and CH6 aptamers provided osteoblast-selective targeting in an in vitro setting [ 186 ]. Additionally, DOTAP-based cationic nanoparticles attached with (AspSerSer) 6 delivered osteogenic siRNA (Plekho1) specifically to the bone-forming areas in osteoporotic rats. Along with forming new bone after in vivo systemic delivery, rats also showed enhanced bone micro-architecture and increased bone mass [ 187 ]. Exosomes were shown to balance bone metabolism and remarkably led BMSCs to differentiate into osteogenic cells in vitro. Administration of BMSC-derived exosomes (STExos) to OVX-induced postmenopausal osteoporotic mice resulted in poor amelioration. Following this insufficiency, BMSC-derived exosomes were functionalized with specific aptamers (STExos-aptamer complex). Intravenous injection of the STExo-aptamer complex increased bone mass in OVX mice as compared to STExo alone [ 188 ]. A similar approach has been proposed in the transplantation of synovial fluid (SF)-derived MSCs (SF-MSCs) for the treatment of OA [ 184 ]. In the study, kartogenin, a small molecule inducing differentiation of SF-MSCs to chondrocytes, was delivered to SF-MSCs via engineered exosomes, resulting in strong promotion of chondrogenesis of SF-MSCs both in vitro and in vivo. Moreover, the SF-MSC-targeting ability of these exosomes was enhanced by adding the MSC-binding peptide E7 (E7-Exo) to deliver kartogenin efficiently. As a result, E7-Exo transporting kartogenin easily accessed the cells and induced the differentiation of cartilage cells more than kartogenin alone or kartogenin-carrying exosomes with no modification in OA rats [ 184 ]. Gene delivery by viral vectors shows remarkable advancements in many diseases. However, some vectors, such as AAVs, represent a broad tissue tropism, leading to ineffective treatment in particular tissues. Puzzo et al. were able to chemically modify the AAV capsid surface by substituting amino acids without disrupting their packaging efficiency, and these novel AAVs were named Nε-AAVs. Nε-AAVs were individually functionalized via conjugating with DNA (AS1411), RNA (E3) aptamers, or a folic acid residue (FA). These modifications increased AAV transduction approximately 3- to 9-fold as compared to non-conjugated counterparts in vitro. Aptamer-mediated AAVs were administered into tumor cells in transplanted mice. The results showed that all three AAVs infected the tumor cells and reached the highest expression by day 14 without an off-target effect in peripheral organs [ 183 ]. In different preclinical studies, novel aptamer-related approaches have been implemented. For example, sclerostin loop3-targeting aptamer (Apc001PE) accelerated bone formation in osteogenesis imperfecta (OI) mice without any cardiovascular risk, which is superior to OI antibodies, causing a potential heart attack, stroke, and cardiovascular death [ 185 ]. In another study, a nanomedicine called DNAM or DNA-MSN containing an anti-sclerostin DNA aptamer (Aptscl56) layer and PEGylated dendritic mesoporous silica nanoparticles has effectively normalized osteoporotic bone loss in OVX mice, with bone enrichment, reduction in sclerostin levels, improvement in bone histomorphology parameters, and recovery in plasma bone turnover markers. In other nanoparticle-related bone targeting strategies, the mechanism of action of DNAM-immobilized Aptscl56 depends on the chelating activity and interaction between phosphate groups of the Aptscl56 and calcium in hydroxyapatites [ 182 ].

4. Future Perspectives

In this review, apart from a comprehensive understanding of bone and cartilage components and their mechanisms, we also highlighted potential molecular targets in bone and cartilage formation. Undoubtedly, inorganic components for bone targeting can be extensively modified, and this will take place more in the future. However, several drawbacks to reaching the targeted tissue, especially cartilage and bone, limit these drugs when correcting disease progression. Therefore, well-designed therapies are required. Organic components are highlighted targets, particularly in bone, and recently, receptor-mediated treatment has gained attention in gene therapy. Receptor mediation among these approaches is a rising star in target bone under various therapies, including direct infusion or cell therapies. Our special targets are chondrocytes that are highly affected by the mutations in the GALNS gene, resulting in MPS IVA with skeletal dysplasia ( Figure 6 ). By knowing that cartilage and bone are hard-to-treat tissues due to the lack of blood vessels, we believe that (1) a consideration of receptors such as collagen receptors, BMPs, GPCRs, EGFR, VEGFR, or other small signaling molecules playing critical roles in chondrogenic development, (2) regulation of downstream pathways such as non-canonical Wnt signaling or Ihh signaling in early development, and (3) regulating ion channels may provide better targeting efficiency of desired drugs. For example, the delivery of anti-β-secretase (BACE1) or iduronate-2-sulfatase (IDS) into the central nervous system surrounded by the blood–brain barrier has been successfully implemented through transferrin receptor-mediated transcytosis. These studies should be considered as a tremendous achievement in difficult-to-reach tissue targeting. With this perspective, a deep understanding of cartilage and bone delivery may provide the appropriate approach. The preclinical gene therapy approaches indicate the importance of targeted tissue delivery by utilizing receptor mediation because fewer administered agents reach the target area, like growth plates of long bones. Therefore, utilizing secondary mechanisms, including receptor-specific tags on enzymes or transgenes, robust expression of the transgene in bone marrow and liver as a potential factory of desired enzyme production, and secretion locally and into circulation might be some of the alternatives in the current state of the art. Unfortunately, there are still many unknown mechanisms underlying cartilage and bone targeting, and more investigation is required to understand how these cells in the growth plate and deep zones of articular cartilage maintain their presence without blood supplies. Understanding these mechanisms will contribute to developing new therapeutic strategies in bone metabolic disease.

Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Author Contributions

B.C conceived the original idea. B.C. and A.F.L. wrote the draft. S.T. supervised B.C. and A.F.L. and revised the manuscript. All authors reviewed and edited the entire manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

References

1. Yang N. Liu Y. The Role of the Immune Microenvironment in Bone Regeneration Int. J. Med. Sci. 2021 18 3697 3707 10.7150/ijms.61080 34790042 PMC8579305

2. Siddiqui J.A. Partridge N.C. Physiological Bone Remodeling: Systemic Regulation and Growth Factor Involvement Physiology 2016 31 233 245 10.1152/physiol.00061.2014 27053737 PMC6734079

3. Wang J. Zhang Y. Cao J. Wang Y. Anwar N. Zhang Z. Zhang D. Ma Y. Xiao Y. Xiao L. The Role of Autophagy in Bone Metabolism and Clinical Significance Autophagy 2023 19 2409 2427 10.1080/15548627.2023.2186112 36858962 PMC10392742

4. Sawamoto K. González J.V.Á. Piechnik M. Otero F.J. Couce M.L. Suzuki Y. Tomatsu S. Mucopolysaccharidosis IVA: Diagnosis, Treatment, and Management Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020 21 1517 10.3390/ijms21041517 32102177 PMC7073202

5. Pauli R.M. Achondroplasia: A Comprehensive Clinical Review Orphanet J. Rare Dis. 2019 14 1 10.1186/s13023-018-0972-6 30606190 PMC6318916

6. Marom R. Rabenhorst B.M. Morello R. Management of Endocrine Disease: Osteogenesis Imperfecta: An Update on Clinical Features and Therapies Eur. J. Endocrinol. 2020 183 R95 R106 10.1530/EJE-20-0299 32621590 PMC7694877

7. Stembalska A. Dudarewicz L. Śmigiel R. Lethal and Life-Limiting Skeletal Dysplasias: Selected Prenatal Issues Adv. Clin. Exp. Med. 2021 30 641 647 10.17219/acem/134166 34019743

8. Stapleton M. Sawamoto K. Alméciga-Díaz C.J. Mackenzie W.G. Mason R.W. Orii T. Tomatsu S. Development of Bone Targeting Drugs Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017 18 1345 10.3390/ijms18071345 28644392 PMC5535838

9. Akyol M.U. Alden T.D. Amartino H. Ashworth J. Belani K. Berger K.I. Borgo A. Braunlin E. Eto Y. Gold J.I. Recommendations for the Management of MPS IVA: Systematic Evidence- and Consensus-Based Guidance Orphanet J. Rare Dis. 2019 14 137 10.1186/s13023-019-1074-9 31196221 PMC6567385

10. Concolino D. Deodato F. Parini R. Enzyme Replacement Therapy: Efficacy and Limitations Ital. J. Pediatr. 2018 44 10.1186/s13052-018-0562-1 PMC6238252 30442189

11. Leal A.F. Alméciga-Díaz C.J. Tomatsu S. Mucopolysaccharidosis IVA: Current Disease Models and Drawbacks Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023 24 16148 10.3390/ijms242216148 38003337 PMC10671113

12. Tomatsu S. Alméciga-Díaz C.J. Montaño A.M. Yabe H. Tanaka A. Dung V.C. Giugliani R. Kubaski F. Mason R.W. Yasuda E. Therapies for the Bone in Mucopolysaccharidoses Mol. Genet. Metab. 2015 114 94 109 10.1016/j.ymgme.2014.12.001 25537451 PMC4312706

13. Alméciga-Díaz C.J. Montaño A.M. Barrera L.A. Tomatsu S. Tailoring the AAV2 Capsid Vector for Bone-Targeting Pediatr. Res. 2018 84 545 551 10.1038/s41390-018-0095-8 30323349 PMC6266866

14. Feng X. Chemical and Biochemical Basis of Cell-Bone Matrix Interaction in Health and Disease Curr. Chem. Biol. 2009 3 189 196 10.2174/187231309788166398 20161446 PMC2790195

15. Viggers R. Al-Mashhadi Z. Starup-Linde J. Vestergaard P. The Efficacy of Alendronate Versus Denosumab on Major Osteoporotic Fracture Risk in Elderly Patients With Diabetes Mellitus: A Danish Retrospective Cohort Study Front. Endocrinol. 2022 12 10.3389/fendo.2021.826997 35154013 PMC8825412

16. Prather C. Adams E. Zentgraf W. Romosozumab: A First-in-Class Sclerostin Inhibitor for Osteoporosis Am. J. Health-Syst. Pharm. 2020 77 1949 1956 10.1093/ajhp/zxaa285 32880646

17. Reid I.R. Billington E.O. Drug Therapy for Osteoporosis in Older Adults Lancet 2022 399 1080 1092 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02646-5 35279261

18. McNamara L. Bone as a Material Comprehensive Biomaterials Elsevier Amsterdam, The Netherlands 2011 Volume 2 169 186

19. Yoshimura T. Matsuyama W. Kamohara H. Discoidin Domain Receptor 1: A New Class of Receptor Regulating Leukocyte-Collagen Interaction Immunol. Res. 2005 31 219 230 10.1385/IR:31:3:219 15888913

20. Vogel W.F. Abdulhussein R. Ford C.E. Sensing Extracellular Matrix: An Update on Discoidin Domain Receptor Function Cell Signal 2006 18 1108 1116 10.1016/j.cellsig.2006.02.012 16626936

21. Chen L. Kong X. Fang Y. Paunikar S. Wang X. Brown J.A.L. Bourke E. Li X. Wang J. Recent Advances in the Role of Discoidin Domain Receptor Tyrosine Kinase 1 and Discoidin Domain Receptor Tyrosine Kinase 2 in Breast and Ovarian Cancer Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2021 9 10.3389/fcell.2021.747314 PMC8595330 34805157

22. Leitinger B. Kwan A.P.L. The Discoidin Domain Receptor DDR2 Is a Receptor for Type X Collagen Matrix Biol. 2006 25 355 364 10.1016/j.matbio.2006.05.006 16806867

23. Chou L. Chen C. Lin Y. Chuang S. Chou H. Lin S. Fu Y. Chang J. Ho M. Wang C. Discoidin Domain Receptor 1 Regulates Endochondral Ossification through Terminal Differentiation of Chondrocytes FASEB J. 2020 34 5767 5781 10.1096/fj.201901852RR 32128899

24. Mohamed F.F. Ge C. Cowling R.T. Lucas D. Hallett S.A. Ono N. Binrayes A.-A. Greenberg B. Franceschi R.T. The Collagen Receptor, Discoidin Domain Receptor 2, Functions in Gli1-Positive Skeletal Progenitors and Chondrocytes to Control Bone Development Bone Res. 2022 10 11 10.1038/s41413-021-00182-w 35140200 PMC8828874

25. Sun M. Chi G. Xu J. Tan Y. Xu J. Lv S. Xu Z. Xia Y. Li L. Li Y. Extracellular Matrix Stiffness Controls Osteogenic Differentiation of Mesenchymal Stem Cells Mediated by Integrin A5 Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2018 9 52 10.1186/s13287-018-0798-0 29490668 PMC5831741

26. Novoseletskaya E.S. Evdokimov P.V. Efimenko A.Y. Extracellular Matrix-Induced Signaling Pathways in Mesenchymal Stem/Stromal Cells Cell Commun. Signal. 2023 21 244 10.1186/s12964-023-01252-8 37726815 PMC10507829

27. Wu S.-C. Hsiao H.-F. Ho M.-L. Hung Y.-L. Chang J.-K. Wang G.-J. Wang C.-Z. Suppression of Discoidin Domain Receptor 1 Expression Enhances the Chondrogenesis of Adipose-Derived Stem Cells Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 2015 308 C685 C696 10.1152/ajpcell.00398.2014 25673773

28. Xue F. Zhou W. Lan Z. The Expression of Two Collagen Receptor Subfamilies, Integrins and Discoidin Domains during Osteogenic and Chondrogenic Differentiation of Human Mesenehymal Stem Cells Biomed. Mater. Eng. 2021 32 195 205 10.3233/BME-201151 33780357

29. Yang H. Sun L. Cai W. Gu J. Xu D. Deb A. Duan J. DDR2, a Discoidin Domain Receptor, Is a Marker of Periosteal Osteoblast and Osteoblast Progenitors J. Bone Miner. Metab. 2020 38 670 677 10.1007/s00774-020-01108-y 32415375 PMC7581459

30. Rintz E. Węgrzyn G. Fujii T. Tomatsu S. Molecular Mechanism of Induction of Bone Growth by the C-Type Natriuretic Peptide Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022 23 5916 10.3390/ijms23115916 35682595 PMC9180634

31. Mariadoss A.V.A. Wang C.-Z. Exploring the Cellular and Molecular Mechanism of Discoidin Domain Receptors (DDR1 and DDR2) in Bone Formation, Regeneration, and Its Associated Disease Conditions Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023 24 14895 10.3390/ijms241914895 37834343 PMC10573612

32. Matada G.S.P. Das A. Dhiwar P.S. Ghara A. DDR1 and DDR2: A Review on Signaling Pathway and Small Molecule Inhibitors as an Anticancer Agent Med. Chem. Res. 2021 30 535 551 10.1007/s00044-020-02694-2

33. Mehta V. Chander H. Munshi A. Complex Roles of Discoidin Domain Receptor Tyrosine Kinases in Cancer Clin. Transl. Oncol. 2021 23 1497 1510 10.1007/s12094-021-02552-6 33634432

34. Khan S.A. Nidhi F.N.U. Amendum P.C. Tomatsu S. Detection of Glycosaminoglycans in Biological Specimens Methods Mol. Biol. 2023 2619 3 24 10.1007/978-1-0716-2946-8_1 36662458 PMC10199356

35. Carvalho M.S. Cabral J.M.S. da Silva C.L. Vashishth D. Bone Matrix Non-Collagenous Proteins in Tissue Engineering: Creating New Bone by Mimicking the Extracellular Matrix Polymers 2021 13 1095 10.3390/polym13071095 33808184 PMC8036283

36. Mende M. Bednarek C. Wawryszyn M. Sauter P. Biskup M.B. Schepers U. Bräse S. Chemical Synthesis of Glycosaminoglycans Chem. Rev. 2016 116 8193 8255 10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00010 27410264

37. Zhu P. Masuda Y. Koumoto K. The Effect of Surface Charge on Hydroxyapatite Nucleation Biomaterials 2004 25 3915 3921 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.10.022 15020168

38. Yang S. Guo Q. Shores L.S. Aly A. Ramakrishnan M. Kim G.H. Lu Q. Su L. Elisseeff J.H. Use of a Chondroitin Sulfate Bioadhesive to Enhance Integration of Bioglass Particles for Repairing Critical-Size Bone Defects J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 2015 103 235 242 10.1002/jbm.a.35143 24616321

39. Keskin D.S. Tezcaner A. Korkusuz P. Korkusuz F. Hasirci V. Collagen–Chondroitin Sulfate-Based PLLA–SAIB-Coated RhBMP-2 Delivery System for Bone Repair Biomaterials 2005 26 4023 4034 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.09.063 15626448

40. Fujioka-Kobayashi M. Schaller B. Kobayashi E. Hernandez M. Zhang Y. Miron R. Hyaluronic Acid Gel-Based Scaffolds as Potential Carrier for Growth Factors: An In Vitro Bioassay on Its Osteogenic Potential J. Clin. Med. 2016 5 112 10.3390/jcm5120112 27916889 PMC5184785

41. Pomin V.H. Keratan Sulfate: An up-to-Date Review Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2015 72 282 289 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2014.08.029 25179279

42. Doherty C. Stapleton M. Piechnik M. Mason R.W. Mackenzie W.G. Yamaguchi S. Kobayashi H. Suzuki Y. Tomatsu S. Effect of Enzyme Replacement Therapy on the Growth of Patients with Morquio A J. Hum. Genet. 2019 64 625 635 10.1038/s10038-019-0604-6 31019230

43. Tomatsu S. Montaño A.M. Oikawa H. Dung V.C. Hashimoto A. Oguma T. Gutiérrez M.L. Takahashi T. Shimada T. Orii T. Enzyme Replacement Therapy in Newborn Mucopolysaccharidosis IVA Mice: Early Treatment Rescues Bone Lesions? Mol. Genet. Metab. 2015 114 195 202 10.1016/j.ymgme.2014.05.013 24953405 PMC4256128

44. Coulson-Thomas Y.M. Coulson-Thomas V.J. Norton A.L. Gesteira T.F. Cavalheiro R.P. Meneghetti M.C.Z. Martins J.R. Dixon R.A. Nader H.B. The Identification of Proteoglycans and Glycosaminoglycans in Archaeological Human Bones and Teeth PLoS ONE 2015 10 e0131105 10.1371/journal.pone.0131105 26107959 PMC4481269

45. Douglas T. Heinemann S. Bierbaum S. Scharnweber D. Worch H. Fibrillogenesis of Collagen Types I, II, and III with Small Leucine-Rich Proteoglycans Decorin and Biglycan Biomacromolecules 2006 7 2388 2393 10.1021/bm0603746 16903686

46. Diehl V. Huber L.S. Trebicka J. Wygrecka M. Iozzo R.V. Schaefer L. The Role of Decorin and Biglycan Signaling in Tumorigenesis Front. Oncol. 2021 11 801801 10.3389/fonc.2021.801801 34917515 PMC8668865

47. Ago Y. Rintz E. Musini K. Ma Z. Tomatsu S. Molecular Mechanisms in Pathophysiology of Mucopolysaccharidosis and Prospects for Innovative Therapy Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024 25 1113 10.3390/ijms25021113 38256186 PMC10816168

48. Douglas T. Hempel U. Mietrach C. Viola M. Vigetti D. Heinemann S. Bierbaum S. Scharnweber D. Worch H. Influence of Collagen-fibril-based Coatings Containing Decorin and Biglycan on Osteoblast Behavior J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 2008 84A 805 816 10.1002/jbm.a.31501 17635036

49. Igwe J.C. Gao Q. Kizivat T. Kao W.W. Kalajzic I. Keratocan Is Expressed by Osteoblasts and Can Modulate Osteogenic Differentiation Connect. Tissue Res. 2011 52 401 407 10.3109/03008207.2010.546536 21405980 PMC3574643

50. Kalamajski S. Aspberg A. Lindblom K. Heinegård D. Oldberg Å. Asporin Competes with Decorin for Collagen Binding, Binds Calcium and Promotes Osteoblast Collagen Mineralization Biochem. J. 2009 423 53 59 10.1042/BJ20090542 19589127

51. Zhao F. Bai Y. Xiang X. Pang X. The Role of Fibromodulin in Inflammatory Responses and Diseases Associated with Inflammation Front. Immunol. 2023 14 1191787 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1191787 37483637 PMC10360182

52. Gori F. Schipani E. Demay M.B. Fibromodulin Is Expressed by Both Chondrocytes and Osteoblasts during Fetal Bone Development J. Cell Biochem. 2001 82 46 57 10.1002/jcb.1115 11400162

53. Iozzo R.V. Schaefer L. Proteoglycan Form and Function: A Comprehensive Nomenclature of Proteoglycans Matrix Biol. 2015 42 11 55 10.1016/j.matbio.2015.02.003 25701227 PMC4859157

54. Capurro M. Izumikawa T. Suarez P. Shi W. Cydzik M. Kaneiwa T. Gariepy J. Bonafe L. Filmus J. Glypican-6 Promotes the Growth of Developing Long Bones by Stimulating Hedgehog Signaling J. Cell Biol. 2017 216 2911 2926 10.1083/jcb.201605119 28696225 PMC5584141

55. Nastase M.V. Young M.F. Schaefer L. Biglycan J. Histochem. Cytochem. 2012 60 963 975 10.1369/0022155412456380 22821552 PMC3527886

56. Lin X. Patil S. Gao Y.-G. Qian A. The Bone Extracellular Matrix in Bone Formation and Regeneration Front. Pharmacol. 2020 11 10.3389/fphar.2020.00757 32528290 PMC7264100

57. Ansari S. Ito K. Hofmann S. Alkaline Phosphatase Activity of Serum Affects Osteogenic Differentiation Cultures ACS Omega 2022 7 12724 12733 10.1021/acsomega.1c07225 35474849 PMC9026015

58. Vimalraj S. Alkaline Phosphatase: Structure, Expression and Its Function in Bone Mineralization Gene 2020 754 144855 10.1016/j.gene.2020.144855 32522695

59. Li H. Zhang J. Liu S. Yan Y. Li X. Consecutive Dephosphorylation by Alkaline Phosphatase-Directed in Situ Formation of Porous Hydrogels of SF with Nanocrystalline Calcium Phosphate Ceramics for Bone Regeneration J. Mater. Chem. B 2020 8 9043 9051 10.1039/D0TB01777A 32955073

60. Kinoshita Y. Mohamed F.F. Amadeu de Oliveira F. Narisawa S. Miyake K. Foster B.L. Millán J.L. Gene Therapy Using Adeno-Associated Virus Serotype 8 Encoding TNAP-D 10 Improves the Skeletal and Dentoalveolar Phenotypes in Alpl-/- Mice J. Bone Miner. Res. 2021 36 1835 1849 10.1002/jbmr.4382 34076297 PMC8446309

61. Nakano C. Kitabatake Y. Takeyari S. Ohata Y. Kubota T. Taketani K. Kogo M. Ozono K. Genetic Correction of Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells Mediated by Transcription Activator-like Effector Nucleases Targeting ALPL Recovers Enzyme Activity and Calcification in Vitro Mol. Genet. Metab. 2019 127 158 165 10.1016/j.ymgme.2019.05.014 31178256

62. Kang M. Wu M. Crane J.L. Asfotase Alfa Improved Skeletal Mineralization and Fracture Healing in a Child with MCAHS Bone 2023 172 116778 10.1016/j.bone.2023.116778 37088336 PMC10214309

63. Delany A.M. Amling M. Priemel M. Howe C. Baron R. Canalis E. Osteopenia and Decreased Bone Formation in Osteonectin-Deficient Mice J. Clin. Investig. 2000 105 915 923 10.1172/JCI7039 10749571 PMC377474

64. Zhu Y. Mo T. Jiang C. Zhang J. Osteonectin Bidirectionally Regulates Osteoblast Mineralization J. Orthop. Surg. Res. 2023 18 761 10.1186/s13018-023-04250-1 37807073 PMC10561403

65. Zhu Y.-S. Zhang J.-N. Mo T.-T. Jiang C. Ma R.-C. Chen L. Discoidin Domain Receptor 2 Activation of P38 Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase as an Important Pathway for Osteonectin-Regulating Osteoblast Mineralization J. Orthop. Surg. Res. 2021 16 711 10.1186/s13018-021-02860-1 34876214 PMC8650413

66. Ge C. Wang Z. Zhao G. Li B. Liao J. Sun H. Franceschi R.T. Discoidin Receptor 2 Controls Bone Formation and Marrow Adipogenesis J. Bone Miner. Res. 2020 36 2098 2099 10.1002/jbmr.4336 34169572

67. McDonald K. Glezeva N. Collier P. O’Reilly J. O’Connell E. Tea I. Russell-Hallinan A. Tonry C. Pennington S. Gallagher J. Tetranectin, a Potential Novel Diagnostic Biomarker of Heart Failure, Is Expressed within the Myocardium and Associates with Cardiac Fibrosis Sci. Rep. 2020 10 7507 10.1038/s41598-020-64558-4 32371911 PMC7200823

68. Bravo D. Josephson A.M. Bradaschia-Correa V. Wong M.Z. Yim N.L. Neibart S.S. Lee S.N. Huo J. Coughlin T. Mizrahi M.M. Temporary Inhibition of the Plasminogen Activator Inhibits Periosteal Chondrogenesis and Promotes Periosteal Osteogenesis during Appendicular Bone Fracture Healing Bone 2018 112 97 106 10.1016/j.bone.2018.04.016 29680264 PMC5970081

69. Carminati L. Taraboletti G. Thrombospondins in Bone Remodeling and Metastatic Bone Disease Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 2020 319 C980 C990 10.1152/ajpcell.00383.2020 32936697

70. Cheng Z. Jin Y. Li J. Shi G. Yu L. Shao B. Tian J. Du Y. Yuan Z. Fibronectin-Targeting and Metalloproteinase-Activatable Smart Imaging Probe for Fluorescence Imaging and Image-Guided Surgery of Breast Cancer J. Nanobiotechnol. 2023 21 112 10.1186/s12951-023-01868-5 PMC10053476 36978072

71. Speziale P. Arciola C.R. Pietrocola G. Fibronectin and Its Role in Human Infective Diseases Cells 2019 8 1516 10.3390/cells8121516 31779172 PMC6952806

72. Alford A.I. Hankenson K.D. Thrombospondins Modulate Cell Function and Tissue Structure in the Skeleton Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 2023 10.1016/j.semcdb.2023.06.011 PMC11115190 37423854

73. Inoue M. Jiang Y. Barnes R.H. Tokunaga M. Martinez-Santibañez G. Geletka L. Lumeng C.N. Buchner D.A. Chun T.-H. Thrombospondin 1 Mediates High-Fat Diet-Induced Muscle Fibrosis and Insulin Resistance in Male Mice Endocrinology 2013 154 4548 4559 10.1210/en.2013-1587 24140711 PMC3836064

74. Barsby T. Bavin E.P. Guest D.J. Three-Dimensional Culture and Transforming Growth Factor Beta3 Synergistically Promote Tenogenic Differentiation of Equine Embryo-Derived Stem Cells Tissue Eng. Part A 2014 20 2604 2613 10.1089/ten.tea.2013.0457 24628376 PMC4195467

75. Stenina-Adognravi O. Plow E.F. Thrombospondin-4 in Tissue Remodeling Matrix Biol. 2019 75–76 300 313 10.1016/j.matbio.2017.11.006 PMC6005712 29138119

76. Frolova E.G. Drazba J. Krukovets I. Kostenko V. Blech L. Harry C. Vasanji A. Drumm C. Sul P. Jenniskens G.J. Control of Organization and Function of Muscle and Tendon by Thrombospondin-4 Matrix Biol. 2014 37 35 48 10.1016/j.matbio.2014.02.003 24589453 PMC4150858

77. Liu J. Pan D. Huang X. Wang S. Chen H. Zhu Y.Z. Ye L. Targeting Collagen in Tumor Extracellular Matrix as a Novel Targeted Strategy in Cancer Immunotherapy Front. Oncol. 2023 13 1225483 10.3389/fonc.2023.1225483 37692860 PMC10484796

78. Napper C.E. Drickamer K. Taylor M.E. Collagen Binding by the Mannose Receptor Mediated through the Fibronectin Type II Domain Biochem. J. 2006 395 579 586 10.1042/BJ20052027 16441238 PMC1462699

79. Singh P. Schwarzbauer J.E. Fibronectin Matrix Assembly Is Essential for Cell Condensation during Chondrogenesis J. Cell Sci. 2014 127 4420 4428 10.1242/jcs.150276 25146392 PMC4197087

80. Min S.-K. Kang H.K. Jung S.Y. Jang D.H. Min B.-M. A Vitronectin-Derived Peptide Reverses Ovariectomy-Induced Bone Loss via Regulation of Osteoblast and Osteoclast Differentiation Cell Death Differ. 2018 25 268 281 10.1038/cdd.2017.153 28937683 PMC5762842

81. Salasznyk R.M. Williams W.A. Boskey A. Batorsky A. Plopper G.E. Adhesion to Vitronectin and Collagen I Promotes Osteogenic Differentiation of Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells J. Biomed. Biotechnol. 2004 2004 24 34 10.1155/S1110724304306017 15123885 PMC545655

82. Hui T. Sørensen E.S. Rittling S.R. Osteopontin Binding to the Alpha 4 Integrin Requires Highest Affinity Integrin Conformation, but Is Independent of Post-Translational Modifications of Osteopontin Matrix Biol. 2015 41 19 25 10.1016/j.matbio.2014.11.005 25446551 PMC4912046

83. Rittling S.R. Chen Y. Feng F. Wu Y. Tumor-Derived Osteopontin Is Soluble, Not Matrix Associated J. Biol. Chem. 2002 277 9175 9182 10.1074/jbc.M109028200 11741994

84. Bai R.-J. Li Y.-S. Zhang F.-J. Osteopontin, a Bridge Links Osteoarthritis and Osteoporosis Front. Endocrinol. 2022 13 1012508 10.3389/fendo.2022.1012508 PMC9649917 36387862

85. Matsui Y. Iwasaki N. Kon S. Takahashi D. Morimoto J. Matsui Y. Denhardt D.T. Rittling S. Minami A. Uede T. Accelerated Development of Aging-associated and Instability-induced Osteoarthritis in Osteopontin-deficient Mice Arthritis Rheum. 2009 60 2362 2371 10.1002/art.24705 19644889

86. Li F. Ye D. Duan J. Sun H. Osteopontin Can Decrease the Cartilage Cellular Inflammatory Reaction Induced by LPS Int. J. Clin. Exp. Med. 2015 8 3889 3894 26064289 PMC4443123

87. Doyle M.E. Dalgarno K. Masoero E. Ferreira A.M. Advances in Biomimetic Collagen Mineralisation and Future Approaches to Bone Tissue Engineering Biopolymers 2023 114 10.1002/bip.23527 PMC10078151 36444710

88. He G. George A. Dentin Matrix Protein 1 Immobilized on Type I Collagen Fibrils Facilitates Apatite Deposition in Vitro J. Biol. Chem. 2004 279 11649 11656 10.1074/jbc.M309296200 14699165

89. Nakanishi T. Michigami T. Pathogenesis of FGF23-Related Hypophosphatemic Diseases Including X-Linked Hypophosphatemia Endocrines 2022 3 303 316 10.3390/endocrines3020025

90. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) FDA Approves First Therapy for Rare Inherited Form of Rickets, x-Linked Hypophosphatemia Available online: https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/fda-approves-first-therapy-rare-inherited-form-rickets-x-linked-hypophosphatemia (accessed on 19 April 2024)

91. Xiao S. Yu C. Chou X. Yuan W. Wang Y. Bu L. Fu G. Qian M. Yang J. Shi Y. Dentinogenesis Imperfecta 1 with or without Progressive Hearing Loss Is Associated with Distinct Mutations in DSPP Nat. Genet. 2001 27 201 204 10.1038/84848 11175790

92. Suzuki S. Sreenath T. Haruyama N. Honeycutt C. Terse A. Cho A. Kohler T. Müller R. Goldberg M. Kulkarni A.B. Dentin Sialoprotein and Dentin Phosphoprotein Have Distinct Roles in Dentin Mineralization Matrix Biol. 2009 28 221 229 10.1016/j.matbio.2009.03.006 19348940 PMC2758621

93. Mizokami A. Kawakubo-Yasukochi T. Hirata M. Osteocalcin and Its Endocrine Functions Biochem. Pharmacol. 2017 132 1 8 10.1016/j.bcp.2017.02.001 28189726

94. Kapoor K. Pi M. Nishimoto S.K. Quarles L.D. Baudry J. Smith J.C. The Carboxylation Status of Osteocalcin Has Important Consequences for Its Structure and Dynamics Biochim. Et Biophys. Acta (BBA) General. Subj. 2021 1865 129809 10.1016/j.bbagen.2020.129809 PMC8843000 33340588

95. Hill H. Grams J. Walton R. Liu J. Moellering D. Garvey W. Carboxylated and Uncarboxylated Forms of Osteocalcin Directly Modulate the Glucose Transport System and Inflammation in Adipocytes Horm. Metab. Res. 2014 46 341 347 10.1055/s-0034-1368709 24554534 PMC5349189

96. Carvalho M.S. Silva J.C. Hoff C.M. Cabral J.M.S. Linhardt R.J. da Silva C.L. Vashishth D. Loss and Rescue of Osteocalcin and Osteopontin Modulate Osteogenic and Angiogenic Features of Mesenchymal Stem/Stromal Cells J. Cell Physiol. 2020 235 7496 7515 10.1002/jcp.29653 32162324

97. Bjørklund G. Svanberg E. Dadar M. Card D.J. Chirumbolo S. Harrington D.J. Aaseth J. The Role of Matrix Gla Protein (MGP) in Vascular Calcification Curr. Med. Chem. 2020 27 1647 1660 10.2174/0929867325666180716104159 30009696

98. Zhang Y. Zhao L. Wang N. Li J. He F. Li X. Wu S. Unexpected Role of Matrix Gla Protein in Osteoclasts: Inhibiting Osteoclast Differentiation and Bone Resorption Mol. Cell Biol. 2019 39 10.1128/MCB.00012-19 PMC6549463 30988158

99. Gao Y. Liu S. Huang J. Guo W. Chen J. Zhang L. Zhao B. Peng J. Wang A. Wang Y. The ECM-Cell Interaction of Cartilage Extracellular Matrix on Chondrocytes Biomed. Res. Int. 2014 2014 648459 10.1155/2014/648459 24959581 PMC4052144

100. Loeser R.F. Sadiev S. Tan L. Goldring M.B. Integrin Expression by Primary and Immortalized Human Chondrocytes: Evidence of a Differential Role for Alpha1beta1 and Alpha2beta1 Integrins in Mediating Chondrocyte Adhesion to Types II and VI Collagen Osteoarthr. Cartil. 2000 8 96 105 10.1053/joca.1999.0277 10772239

101. Shin S.Y. Pozzi A. Boyd S.K. Clark A.L. Integrin A1β1 Protects against Signs of Post-Traumatic Osteoarthritis in the Female Murine Knee Partially via Regulation of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Signalling Osteoarthr. Cartil. 2016 24 1795 1806 10.1016/j.joca.2016.05.013 27211864

102. Hu T. Zhang Z. Deng C. Ma X. Liu X. Effects of Β2 Integrins on Osteoclasts, Macrophages, Chondrocytes, and Synovial Fibroblasts in Osteoarthritis Biomolecules 2022 12 1653 10.3390/biom12111653 36359003 PMC9687144

103. Song E.K. Jeon J. Jang D.G. Kim H.E. Sim H.J. Kwon K.Y. Medina-Ruiz S. Jang H.-J. Lee A.R. Rho J.G. ITGBL1 Modulates Integrin Activity to Promote Cartilage Formation and Protect against Arthritis Sci. Transl. Med. 2018 10 10.1126/scitranslmed.aam7486 30305454

104. Zhen G. Guo Q. Li Y. Wu C. Zhu S. Wang R. Guo X.E. Kim B.C. Huang J. Hu Y. Mechanical Stress Determines the Configuration of TGFβ Activation in Articular Cartilage Nat. Commun. 2021 12 1706 10.1038/s41467-021-21948-0 33731712 PMC7969741

105. Staruschenko A. Ma R. Palygin O. Dryer S.E. Ion Channels and Channelopathies in Glomeruli Physiol. Rev. 2023 103 787 854 10.1152/physrev.00013.2022 36007181 PMC9662803

106. Guardiani C. Cecconi F. Chiodo L. Cottone G. Malgaretti P. Maragliano L. Barabash M.L. Camisasca G. Ceccarelli M. Corry B. Computational Methods and Theory for Ion Channel Research Adv. Phys. X 2022 7 10.1080/23746149.2022.2080587 35874965 PMC9302924

107. Catacuzzeno L. Franciolini F. The 70-year Search for the Voltage-sensing Mechanism of Ion Channels J. Physiol. 2022 600 3227 3247 10.1113/JP282780 35665931 PMC9545881

108. Varga Z. Juhász T. Matta C. Fodor J. Katona É. Bartok A. Oláh T. Sebe A. Csernoch L. Panyi G. Switch of Voltage-Gated K + Channel Expression in the Plasma Membrane of Chondrogenic Cells Affects Cytosolic Ca 2+ -Oscillations and Cartilage Formation PLoS ONE 2011 6 e27957 10.1371/journal.pone.0027957 22132179 PMC3221679

109. Suzuki Y. Yamamura H. Imaizumi Y. Clark R.B. Giles W.R. K + and Ca 2+ Channels Regulate Ca 2+ Signaling in Chondrocytes: An Illustrated Review Cells 2020 9 1577 10.3390/cells9071577 32610485 PMC7408816

110. Liang H.-Y. Yin H.-X. Li S.-F. Chen Y. Zhao Y.-J. Hu W. Zhou R.-P. Calcium-Permeable Channels Cooperation for Rheumatoid Arthritis: Therapeutic Opportunities Biomolecules 2022 12 1383 10.3390/biom12101383 36291594 PMC9599458

111. Xu Y. Chen F. Acid-Sensing Ion Channel-1a in Articular Chondrocytes and Synovial Fibroblasts: A Novel Therapeutic Target for Rheumatoid Arthritis Front. Immunol. 2021 11 580936 10.3389/fimmu.2020.580936 33584647 PMC7876322

112. Galindo T. Reyna J. Weyer A. Evidence for Transient Receptor Potential (TRP) Channel Contribution to Arthritis Pain and Pathogenesis Pharmaceuticals 2018 11 105 10.3390/ph11040105 30326593 PMC6315622

113. Li Z. Huang Z. Bai L. The P2X7 Receptor in Osteoarthritis Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2021 9 628330 10.3389/fcell.2021.628330 33644066 PMC7905059

114. Lee W. Guilak F. Liedtke W. Role of Piezo Channels in Joint Health and Injury Current Topics in Membranes Elsevier Amsterdam, The Netherlands 2017 Volume 79 263 273 10.1016/bs.ctm.2016.10.003 PMC5681866 28728820

115. Moroni M. Servin-Vences M.R. Fleischer R. Sánchez-Carranza O. Lewin G.R. Voltage Gating of Mechanosensitive PIEZO Channels Nat. Commun. 2018 9 1096 10.1038/s41467-018-03502-7 29545531 PMC5854696

116. Lee W. Leddy H.A. Chen Y. Lee S.H. Zelenski N.A. McNulty A.L. Wu J. Beicker K.N. Coles J. Zauscher S. Synergy between Piezo1 and Piezo2 Channels Confers High-Strain Mechanosensitivity to Articular Cartilage Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2014 111 E5114 E5122 10.1073/pnas.1414298111 25385580 PMC4250098

117. Atsuta Y. Tomizawa R.R. Levin M. Tabin C.J. L-Type Voltage-Gated Ca 2+ Channel CaV1.2 Regulates Chondrogenesis during Limb Development Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2019 116 21592 21601 10.1073/pnas.1908981116 31591237 PMC6815189

118. Parisi C. Chandaria V.V. Nowlan N.C. Blocking Mechanosensitive Ion Channels Eliminates the Effects of Applied Mechanical Loading on Chick Joint Morphogenesis Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2018 373 20170317 10.1098/rstb.2017.0317 30249769 PMC6158207

119. Gnanasambandam R. Ghatak C. Yasmann A. Nishizawa K. Sachs F. Ladokhin A.S. Sukharev S.I. Suchyna T.M. GsMTx4: Mechanism of Inhibiting Mechanosensitive Ion Channels Biophys. J. 2017 112 31 45 10.1016/j.bpj.2016.11.013 28076814 PMC5231890

120. Hendrickx G. Fischer V. Liedert A. von Kroge S. Haffner-Luntzer M. Brylka L. Pawlus E. Schweizer M. Yorgan T. Baranowsky A. Piezo 1 Inactivation in Chondrocytes Impairs Trabecular Bone Formation J. Bone Miner. Res. 2021 36 369 384 10.1002/jbmr.4198 33180356

121. Xu X. Liu S. Liu H. Ru K. Jia Y. Wu Z. Liang S. Khan Z. Chen Z. Qian A. Piezo Channels: Awesome Mechanosensitive Structures in Cellular Mechanotransduction and Their Role in Bone Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021 22 6429 10.3390/ijms22126429 34208464 PMC8234635

122. Gonzalez-Perez V. Lingle C.J. Regulation of BK Channels by Beta and Gamma Subunits Annu. Rev. Physiol. 2019 81 113 137 10.1146/annurev-physiol-022516-034038 30742788 PMC6380188

123. Orfali R. Albanyan N. Ca 2+ -Sensitive Potassium Channels Molecules 2023 28 885 10.3390/molecules28020885 36677942 PMC9861210

124. Matta C. Lewis R. Fellows C. Diszhazi G. Almassy J. Miosge N. Dixon J. Uribe M.C. May S. Poliska S. Transcriptome-based Screening of Ion Channels and Transporters in a Migratory Chondroprogenitor Cell Line Isolated from Late-stage Osteoarthritic Cartilage J. Cell Physiol. 2021 236 7421 7439 10.1002/jcp.30413 34008188

125. Haidar O. O’Neill N. Staunton C.A. Bavan S. O’Brien F. Zouggari S. Sharif U. Mobasheri A. Kumagai K. Barrett-Jolley R. Pro-Inflammatory Cytokines Drive Deregulation of Potassium Channel Expression in Primary Synovial Fibroblasts Front. Physiol. 2020 11 226 10.3389/fphys.2020.00226 32265733 PMC7105747

126. Matta C. Juhász T. Fodor J. Hajdú T. Katona É. Szűcs-Somogyi C. Takács R. Vágó J. Oláh T. Bartók Á. N-Methyl-D-Aspartate (NMDA) Receptor Expression and Function Is Required for Early Chondrogenesis Cell Commun. Signal. 2019 17 166 10.1186/s12964-019-0487-3 31842918 PMC6915923

127. Lewis R. Barrett-Jolley R. Changes in Membrane Receptors and Ion Channels as Potential Biomarkers for Osteoarthritis Front. Physiol. 2015 6 357 10.3389/fphys.2015.00357 26648874 PMC4664663

128. Alhilali M. Hearn J.I. Rong J. Jain L. Bolam S.M. Monk A.P. Munro J.T. Dalbeth N. Poulsen R.C. IL-1β Induces Changes in Expression of Core Circadian Clock Components PER2 and BMAL1 in Primary Human Chondrocytes through the NMDA Receptor/CREB and NF-ΚB Signalling Pathways Cell Signal 2021 87 110143 10.1016/j.cellsig.2021.110143 34481895

129. Weis W.I. Kobilka B.K. The Molecular Basis of G Protein–Coupled Receptor Activation Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2018 87 897 919 10.1146/annurev-biochem-060614-033910 29925258 PMC6535337

130. Yang D. Zhou Q. Labroska V. Qin S. Darbalaei S. Wu Y. Yuliantie E. Xie L. Tao H. Cheng J. G Protein-Coupled Receptors: Structure- and Function-Based Drug Discovery Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2021 6 7 10.1038/s41392-020-00435-w 33414387 PMC7790836

131. Chagin A.S. Kronenberg H.M. Role of G-Proteins in the Differentiation of Epiphyseal Chondrocytes J. Mol. Endocrinol. 2014 53 R39 R45 10.1530/JME-14-0093 24982242 PMC4152416

132. He Q. Shumate L.T. Matthias J. Aydin C. Wein M.N. Spatz J.M. Goetz R. Mohammadi M. Plagge A. Divieti Pajevic P. A G Protein–Coupled, IP3/Protein Kinase C Pathway Controlling the Synthesis of Phosphaturic Hormone FGF23 JCI Insight 2019 4 10.1172/jci.insight.125007 PMC6777913 31484825

133. Chagin A.S. Vuppalapati K.K. Kobayashi T. Guo J. Hirai T. Chen M. Offermanns S. Weinstein L.S. Kronenberg H.M. G-Protein Stimulatory Subunit Alpha and Gq/11α G-Proteins Are Both Required to Maintain Quiescent Stem-like Chondrocytes Nat. Commun. 2014 5 3673 10.1038/ncomms4673 24781502 PMC4154354

134. Noor S. Hakimzada N. Safi N. Alikozai S.M. Rasooli A.J. Jalalzai T. Siddiqui Q. Sestani A.J. Nasir N. Noor S. Albright Hereditary Osteodystrophy: Delay in the Diagnosis of a Rare Disorder Due to Restricted Medical Services Clin. Case Rep. 2023 11 e6841 10.1002/ccr3.6841 36694647 PMC9842773

135. Kim J. Shim M. Prostaglandin F2 Receptor (FP) Signaling Regulates Bmp Signaling and Promotes Chondrocyte Differentiation Biochim. Et Biophys. Acta (BBA) Mol. Cell Res. 2015 1853 500 512 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2014.12.003 25499765 PMC4344833

136. Jones S.W. Brockbank S.M.V. Mobbs M.L. Le Good N.J. Soma-Haddrick S. Heuze A.J. Langham C.J. Timms D. Newham P. Needham M.R.C. The Orphan G-Protein Coupled Receptor RDC1: Evidence for a Role in Chondrocyte Hypertrophy and Articular Cartilage Matrix Turnover Osteoarthr. Cartil. 2006 14 597 608 10.1016/j.joca.2006.01.007 16647866

137. Zhong X.-P. Xia W.-F. Regulation of Bone Metabolism Mediated by β-Adrenergic Receptor and Its Clinical Application World J. Clin. Cases 2021 9 8967 8973 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i30.8967 34786380 PMC8567525

138. Yamaura K. Akiyama S. Ueno K. Increased Expression of the Histamine H 4 Receptor Subtype in Hypertrophic Differentiation of Chondrogenic ATDC5 Cells J. Cell Biochem. 2012 113 1054 1060 10.1002/jcb.23436 22065367

139. Carlson E.L. Karuppagounder V. Pinamont W.J. Yoshioka N.K. Ahmad A. Schott E.M. Le Bleu H.K. Zuscik M.J. Elbarbary R.A. Kamal F. Paroxetine-Mediated GRK2 Inhibition Is a Disease-Modifying Treatment for Osteoarthritis Sci. Transl. Med. 2021 13 eaau8491 10.1126/scitranslmed.aau8491 33568523

140. Sriram K. Insel P.A. G Protein-Coupled Receptors as Targets for Approved Drugs: How Many Targets and How Many Drugs? Mol. Pharmacol. 2018 93 251 258 10.1124/mol.117.111062 29298813 PMC5820538

141. Nordberg R.C. Mellor L.F. Krause A.R. Donahue H.J. Loboa E.G. LRP Receptors in Chondrocytes Are Modulated by Simulated Microgravity and Cyclic Hydrostatic Pressure PLoS ONE 2019 14 e0223245 10.1371/journal.pone.0223245 31584963 PMC6777824

142. Gao Y. Chen N. Fu Z. Zhang Q. Progress of Wnt Signaling Pathway in Osteoporosis Biomolecules 2023 13 483 10.3390/biom13030483 36979418 PMC10046187

143. Zarei A. Hulley P.A. Sabokbar A. Javaid M.K. Co-Expression of DKK-1 and Sclerostin in Subchondral Bone of the Proximal Femoral Heads from Osteoarthritic Hips Calcif. Tissue Int. 2017 100 609 618 10.1007/s00223-017-0246-7 28275825 PMC5409924

144. Chan B.Y. Fuller E.S. Russell A.K. Smith S.M. Smith M.M. Jackson M.T. Cake M.A. Read R.A. Bateman J.F. Sambrook P.N. Increased Chondrocyte Sclerostin May Protect against Cartilage Degradation in Osteoarthritis Osteoarthr. Cartil. 2011 19 874 885 10.1016/j.joca.2011.04.014 21619935

145. Chang M.-K. Kramer I. Keller H. Gooi J.H. Collett C. Jenkins D. Ettenberg S.A. Cong F. Halleux C. Kneissel M. Reversing LRP5-Dependent Osteoporosis and SOST Deficiency–Induced Sclerosing Bone Disorders by Altering WNT Signaling Activity J. Bone Miner. Res. 2014 29 29 42 10.1002/jbmr.2059 23901037

146. Cosman F. Crittenden D.B. Adachi J.D. Binkley N. Czerwinski E. Ferrari S. Hofbauer L.C. Lau E. Lewiecki E.M. Miyauchi A. Romosozumab Treatment in Postmenopausal Women with Osteoporosis N. Engl. J. Med. 2016 375 1532 1543 10.1056/NEJMoa1607948 27641143

147. Ruscitti P. Cipriani P. Carubbi F. Liakouli V. Zazzeroni F. Di Benedetto P. Berardicurti O. Alesse E. Giacomelli R. The Role of IL-1β in the Bone Loss during Rheumatic Diseases Mediat. Inflamm. 2015 2015 1 10 10.1155/2015/782382 25954061 PMC4410538

148. Shin Y. Huh Y. Kim K. Kim S. Park K. Koh J.-T. Chun J.-S. Ryu J.-H. Low-Density Lipoprotein Receptor–Related Protein 5 Governs Wnt-Mediated Osteoarthritic Cartilage Destruction Arthritis Res. Ther. 2014 16 R37 10.1186/ar4466 24479426 PMC3978879

149. Yamamoto K. Wilkinson D. Bou-Gharios G. Targeting Dysregulation of Metalloproteinase Activity in Osteoarthritis Calcif. Tissue Int. 2021 109 277 290 10.1007/s00223-020-00739-7 32772139 PMC8403128

150. Yamamoto K. Troeberg L. Scilabra S.D. Pelosi M. Murphy C.L. Strickland D.K. Nagase H. LRP-1-mediated Endocytosis Regulates Extracellular Activity of ADAMTS-5 in Articular Cartilage FASEB J. 2013 27 511 521 10.1096/fj.12-216671 23064555 PMC3545526

151. Yamamoto K. Santamaria S. Botkjaer K.A. Dudhia J. Troeberg L. Itoh Y. Murphy G. Nagase H. Inhibition of Shedding of Low-Density Lipoprotein Receptor–Related Protein 1 Reverses Cartilage Matrix Degradation in Osteoarthritis Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017 69 1246 1256 10.1002/art.40080 28235248 PMC5449214

152. Wuttisiriboon K. Tippayawat P. Daduang J. Limpaiboon T. Ca 2+ /Calmodulin-Dependent Protein Kinase II Inhibitor KN-93 Enhances Chondrogenesis of Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cells and Delays Chondrogenic Hypertrophy Vivo 2023 37 667 678 10.21873/invivo.13127 PMC10026659 36881077

153. Karabicici M. Azbazdar Y. Iscan E. Ozhan G. Misregulation of Wnt Signaling Pathways at the Plasma Membrane in Brain and Metabolic Diseases Membranes 2021 11 844 10.3390/membranes11110844 34832073 PMC8621778

154. Zhao M. Wang Z. Yang M. Ding Y. Zhao M. Wu H. Zhang Y. Lu Q. The Roles of Orphan G Protein-Coupled Receptors in Autoimmune Diseases Clin. Rev. Allergy Immunol. 2021 60 220 243 10.1007/s12016-020-08829-y 33411320

155. Zhang R. Oyajobi B.O. Harris S.E. Chen D. Tsao C. Deng H.-W. Zhao M. Wnt/β-Catenin Signaling Activates Bone Morphogenetic Protein 2 Expression in Osteoblasts Bone 2013 52 145 156 10.1016/j.bone.2012.09.029 23032104 PMC3712130

156. Li H.-Z. Zhang J. Yuan D.-L. Xie W.-Q. Ladel C.H. Mobasheri A. Li Y.-S. Role of Signaling Pathways in Age-Related Orthopedic Diseases: Focus on the Fibroblast Growth Factor Family Mil. Med. Res. 2024 11 40 10.1186/s40779-024-00544-5 38902808 PMC11191355

157. Cremers S. Drake M.T. Ebetino F.H. Bilezikian J.P. Russell R.G.G. Pharmacology of Bisphosphonates Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 2019 85 1052 1062 10.1111/bcp.13867 30650219 PMC6533426

158. Dayanand P. Sandhyavenu H. Dayanand S. Martinez J. Rangaswami J. Role of Bisphosphonates in Vascular Calcification and Bone Metabolism: A Clinical Summary Curr. Cardiol. Rev. 2018 14 192 199 10.2174/1573403X14666180619103258 29921207 PMC6131409

159. Xu H. Wang W. Liu X. Huang W. Zhu C. Xu Y. Yang H. Bai J. Geng D. Targeting Strategies for Bone Diseases: Signaling Pathways and Clinical Studies Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2023 8 202 10.1038/s41392-023-01467-8 37198232 PMC10192458

160. Coxon F.P. Thompson K. Roelofs A.J. Ebetino F.H. Rogers M.J. Visualizing Mineral Binding and Uptake of Bisphosphonate by Osteoclasts and Non-Resorbing Cells Bone 2008 42 848 860 10.1016/j.bone.2007.12.225 18325866

161. Drake M.T. Clarke B.L. Khosla S. Bisphosphonates: Mechanism of Action and Role in Clinical Practice Mayo Clin. Proc. 2008 83 1032 1045 10.4065/83.9.1032 18775204 PMC2667901

162. Turek J. Ebetino F.H. Lundy M.W. Sun S. Kashemirov B.A. McKenna C.E. Gallant M.A. Plotkin L.I. Bellido T. Duan X. Bisphosphonate Binding Affinity Affects Drug Distribution in Both Intracortical and Trabecular Bone of Rabbits Calcif. Tissue Int. 2012 90 202 210 10.1007/s00223-012-9570-0 22249525 PMC10132775

163. Suva L.J. Cooper A. Watts A.E. Ebetino F.H. Price J. Gaddy D. Bisphosphonates in Veterinary Medicine: The New Horizon for Use Bone 2021 142 115711 10.1016/j.bone.2020.115711 33141069

164. Schini M. Peel N. Toronjo-Urquiza L. Thomas E. Salam S. Khwaja A. Eastell R. Walsh J.S. Evaluation of Estimated Glomerular Function (EGFR) versus Creatinine Clearance (CrCl) to Predict Acute Kidney Injury When Using Zoledronate for the Treatment of Osteoporosis Osteoporos. Int. 2022 33 737 744 10.1007/s00198-021-06160-6 34654939

165. Li N. Cornelissen D. Silverman S. Pinto D. Si L. Kremer I. Bours S. de Bot R. Boonen A. Evers S. An Updated Systematic Review of Cost-Effectiveness Analyses of Drugs for Osteoporosis Pharmacoeconomics 2021 39 181 209 10.1007/s40273-020-00965-9 33026634 PMC7867562

166. Shao H. Varamini P. Breast Cancer Bone Metastasis: A Narrative Review of Emerging Targeted Drug Delivery Systems Cells 2022 11 388 10.3390/cells11030388 35159207 PMC8833898

167. Jing C. Li B. Tan H. Zhang C. Liang H. Na H. Chen S. Liu C. Zhao L. Alendronate-Decorated Nanoparticles as Bone-Targeted Alendronate Carriers for Potential Osteoporosis Treatment ACS Appl. Bio Mater. 2021 4 4907 4916 10.1021/acsabm.1c00199 35007039

168. Wang Y. Yao J. Cai L. Liu T. Wang X. Zhang Y. Zhou Z. Li T. Liu M. Lai R. Bone-Targeted Extracellular Vesicles from Mesenchymal Stem Cells for Osteoporosis Therapy Int. J. Nanomed. 2020 Volume 15 7967 7977 10.2147/IJN.S263756 PMC7573321 33116512

169. Katsumi H. Yamashita S. Morishita M. Yamamoto A. Bone-Targeted Drug Delivery Systems and Strategies for Treatment of Bone Metastasis Chem. Pharm. Bull. 2020 68 560 566 10.1248/cpb.c20-00017 32611993

170. Warner A.J. Hathaway-Schrader J.D. Lubker R. Davies C. Novince C.M. Tetracyclines and Bone: Unclear Actions with Potentially Lasting Effects Bone 2022 159 116377 10.1016/j.bone.2022.116377 35248788 PMC9035080

171. Liang Q. Zhang P. Zhang L. Luan H. Li X. Xiang H. Jing S. Song X. Development of Tetracycline-Modified Nanoparticles for Bone-Targeted Delivery of Anti-Tubercular Drug Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2023 11 1207520 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1207520 37635999 PMC10450143

172. Que Y. Yang Y. Zafar H. Wang D. Tetracycline-Grafted MPEG-PLGA Micelles for Bone-Targeting and Osteoporotic Improvement Front. Pharmacol. 2022 13 993095 10.3389/fphar.2022.993095 36188546 PMC9515468

173. Hirohashi Y. Kamijo S. Khan M. Ikeda M. Oki M. Matin K. Rashed F. Aoki K. Tetracycline, an Appropriate Reagent for Measuring Bone-Formation Activity in the Murine Model of the Streptococcus Mutans-Induced Bone Loss Front. Cell Infect. Microbiol. 2021 11 714366 10.3389/fcimb.2021.714366 34589443 PMC8473704

174. Dempster D.W. Compston J.E. Drezner M.K. Glorieux F.H. Kanis J.A. Malluche H. Meunier P.J. Ott S.M. Recker R.R. Parfitt A.M. Standardized Nomenclature, Symbols, and Units for Bone Histomorphometry: A 2012 Update of the Report of the ASBMR Histomorphometry Nomenclature Committee J. Bone Miner. Res. 2013 28 2 17 10.1002/jbmr.1805 23197339 PMC3672237

175. Kim Y. Kim J. Lee H. Shin W.-R. Lee S. Lee J. Park J.-I. Jhun B.H. Kim Y.-H. Yi S.-J. Tetracycline Analogs Inhibit Osteoclast Differentiation by Suppressing MMP-9-Mediated Histone H3 Cleavage Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019 20 4038 10.3390/ijms20164038 31430857 PMC6719029

176. Reichert J.C. Cipitria A. Epari D.R. Saifzadeh S. Krishnakanth P. Berner A. Woodruff M.A. Schell H. Mehta M. Schuetz M.A. A Tissue Engineering Solution for Segmental Defect Regeneration in Load-Bearing Long Bones Sci. Transl. Med. 2012 4 141ra93 10.1126/scitranslmed.3003720 22764209

177. Martin V. Bettencourt A.F. Santos C. Fernandes M.H. Gomes P.S. Unveiling the Osteogenic Potential of Tetracyclines: A Comparative Study in Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells Cells 2023 12 2244 10.3390/cells12182244 37759467 PMC10526833

178. Shin K. Kent J.E. Singh C. Fujimoto L.M. Yu J. Tian Y. Im W. Marassi F.M. Calcium and Hydroxyapatite Binding Site of Human Vitronectin Provides Insights to Abnormal Deposit Formation Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2020 117 18504 18510 10.1073/pnas.2007699117 32699145 PMC7414086

179. Liu X. Hu J. Ning Y. Xu H. Cai H. Yang A. Shi Z. Li Z. Aptamer Technology and Its Applications in Bone Diseases Cell Transplant. 2023 32 096368972211449 10.1177/09636897221144949 36591965 PMC9811309

180. Wang Z. Yang X. Lee N.Z. Cao X. Multivalent Aptamer Approach: Designs, Strategies, and Applications Micromachines 2022 13 436 10.3390/mi13030436 35334728 PMC8956053

181. Radford D.C. Yang J. Doan M.C. Li L. Dixon A.S. Owen S.C. Kopeček J. Multivalent HER2-Binding Polymer Conjugates Facilitate Rapid Endocytosis and Enhance Intracellular Drug Delivery J. Control. Release 2020 319 285 299 10.1016/j.jconrel.2019.12.049 31899273

182. Niu Y. Yang Y. Yang Z. Wang X. Zhang P. Lv L. Liu Y. Liu Y. Zhou Y. Aptamer-Immobilized Bone-Targeting Nanoparticles in Situ Reduce Sclerostin for Osteoporosis Treatment Nano Today 2022 45 101529 10.1016/j.nantod.2022.101529

183. Puzzo F. Zhang C. Powell Gray B. Zhang F. Sullenger B.A. Kay M.A. Aptamer-Programmable Adeno-Associated Viral Vectors as a Novel Platform for Cell-Specific Gene Transfer Mol. Ther. Nucleic Acids 2023 31 383 397 10.1016/j.omtn.2023.01.007 36817723 PMC9929486

184. Xu X. Liang Y. Li X. Ouyang K. Wang M. Cao T. Li W. Liu J. Xiong J. Li B. Exosome-Mediated Delivery of Kartogenin for Chondrogenesis of Synovial Fluid-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells and Cartilage Regeneration Biomaterials 2021 269 120539 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2020.120539 33243424

185. Wang L. Yu Y. Ni S. Li D. Liu J. Xie D. Chu H.Y. Ren Q. Zhong C. Zhang N. Therapeutic Aptamer Targeting Sclerostin Loop3 for Promoting Bone Formation without Increasing Cardiovascular Risk in Osteogenesis Imperfecta Mice Theranostics 2022 12 5645 5674 10.7150/thno.63177 35966595 PMC9373813

186. Liang C. Guo B. Wu H. Shao N. Li D. Liu J. Dang L. Wang C. Li H. Li S. Aptamer-Functionalized Lipid Nanoparticles Targeting Osteoblasts as a Novel RNA Interference–Based Bone Anabolic Strategy Nat. Med. 2015 21 288 294 10.1038/nm.3791 25665179 PMC5508976

187. Zhang G. Guo B. Wu H. Tang T. Zhang B.-T. Zheng L. He Y. Yang Z. Pan X. Chow H. A Delivery System Targeting Bone Formation Surfaces to Facilitate RNAi-Based Anabolic Therapy Nat. Med. 2012 18 307 314 10.1038/nm.2617 22286306

188. Luo Z.-W. Li F.-X.-Z. Liu Y.-W. Rao S.-S. Yin H. Huang J. Chen C.-Y. Hu Y. Zhang Y. Tan Y.-J. Aptamer-Functionalized Exosomes from Bone Marrow Stromal Cells Target Bone to Promote Bone Regeneration Nanoscale 2019 11 20884 20892 10.1039/C9NR02791B 31660556