MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1055/s-0042-121849

Медицинская библиотека · Deutsche medizinische Wochenschrift (1946) · 2017

[Dentogene Focus as a Rare Cause of Necrotizing Fasciitis].

Kloth Christopher, Hoefert Sebastian, Fischborn Till, Schraml Christina

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

History and clinical findings We elaborate the case of a 72-year-old patient who presented with a painful swelling of the lower jaw in the emergency unit. Investigations and diagnosis In the clinical examination and the CT scan, a widespread cervical emphysema was found which raised suspicion for the presence of a necrotizing fasciitis of the head and neck due to aerogenic infection. Close spatial vicinity to the teeth of the left upper and lower jaw was present, so that the necrotizing fasciitis was assumed to be odontogenic. Treatment and course Based on the clinical presentation and the imaging findings the diagnosis of necrotizing fasciitis in the sense of a possible infection with gas building bacteria accompanying with an infection of the mediastinum was made. Immediately performed therapy included sternotomy and extended surgical debridement of necrosis. Conclusion The presented case emphasizes that necrotizing fasciitis due to gas-producing infections should be considered as a differential diagnosis for cervical soft tissue emphysema for which an odontogenic focus is the most common cause. Rapid diagnosis is essential for successful treatment consisting of immediate surgical debridement and intravenous antibiotics.

Для цитирования: Kloth Christopher, Hoefert Sebastian, Fischborn Till, Schraml Christina. [Dentogene Focus as a Rare Cause of Necrotizing Fasciitis].. Deutsche medizinische Wochenschrift (1946). 2017. DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-121849.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.