MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1053/j.jfas.2018.08.003

Медицинская библиотека · The Journal of foot and ankle surgery : official publication of the American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons · 2018

Light Bulb Procedure for the Treatment of Tarsal Navicular Osteonecrosis After Failed Percutaneous Decompression: A Case Report.

Chang Shun-Min, Chen Pei-Yu, Tsai Mu-Shiun, Shee Bing-Wu

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Tarsal navicular osteonecrosis in adults is a rare condition with unclear etiology, and the optimal treatment has not been established. Here we report a case of tarsal navicular osteonecrosis with a complete course of treatment and comprehensive imaging studies starting at an early stage. A 37-year-old female diagnosed with tarsal navicular osteonecrosis was first treated with percutaneous decompression, but her symptoms persisted postoperatively. The tarsal navicular showed no further collapse, but follow-up magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at 6 months postoperatively revealed persistent osteonecrotic changes. Debridement of the necrotic bone with preservation of the cortical shell and bone substitute packing for the defect (light bulb procedure) were performed. The symptoms resolved by 3 months postoperatively, and the patient could return to work. At a 6-year follow-up visit, the patient was free of symptoms, and MRI showed remodeling of the tarsal navicular without further collapse.

Для цитирования: Chang Shun-Min, Chen Pei-Yu, Tsai Mu-Shiun, Shee Bing-Wu. Light Bulb Procedure for the Treatment of Tarsal Navicular Osteonecrosis After Failed Percutaneous Decompression: A Case Report.. The Journal of foot and ankle surgery : official publication of the American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons. 2018. DOI: 10.1053/j.jfas.2018.08.003.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.