MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · Hong Kong medical journal = Xianggang yi xue za zhi · 2006

Epidemiology of leprosy and response to treatment in Hong Kong.

Ho C K, Lo K K

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVES

To review the reported trend of leprosy in Hong Kong.

DESIGN

Retrospective study.

SETTING

Three major leprosy clinics in Hong Kong.

PATIENTS: Leprosy patients registered between 1970 and 2004.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Incidence, rate of deformities, distribution of leprosy subtypes, age distribution, and relapses after therapy.

RESULTS

The incidence of leprosy has decreased from 3.2 per 100,000 population in 1970 to 0.088 per 100,000 population in 2004. The proportion of the three subtypes of leprosy has remained roughly equal. There have been 87 relapses within this period with 54 (62%) cases of lepromatous leprosy, 22 (25%) borderline leprosy, and 11 (13%) tuberculoid leprosy. The overall relapse rate was 6.7% (0.2 per 100 person-years); this can be subdivided as a relapse rate for multidrug therapy of 3.2% (0.33 per 100 person-years) and for dapsone monotherapy of 8.3% (0.2 per 100 person-years). The mean interval to relapse for multidrug therapy and dapsone monotherapy was 1.83 and 5.8 years, respectively. The mean duration till relapse for patients on dapsone monotherapy was 15.6 years.

CONCLUSION

Treatment with recommended WHO-multidrug therapy is effective and well tolerated. Dapsone monotherapy is no longer effective. Leprosy is well controlled in Hong Kong but continued surveillance is required to detect relapses and to ensure good patient compliance with treatment.

Для цитирования: Ho C K, Lo K K. Epidemiology of leprosy and response to treatment in Hong Kong.. Hong Kong medical journal = Xianggang yi xue za zhi. 2006.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.