MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1186/1471-2334-5-74

Медицинская библиотека · BMC infectious diseases · 2005

Leprosy & gangrene: a rare association; role of anti phospholipid antibodies.

Akerkar Shashank M, Bichile Lata S

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Leprosy still remains an important public health problem for many parts of the world. An association of gangrene with leprosy is a rare one & can have a number of causative mechanisms. We present a case with Leprosy & gangrene with positive anti phopholipid antibody titers.

CASE PRESENTATION: A 50-year-old non-diabetic, non-hypertensive lady presented with 2 months history of progressive gangrene of bilateral toes. She was found to have madarosis & hypopigmented, hypoaesthetic macular lesions on the upper limb & thighs. Bilateral ulnar & popliteal nerves were thickened. A skin biopsy of the lesions revealed borderline tuberculoid leprosy, slit skin smears revealed a bacteriological index of 1+. She did not have any evidence of thromboembolic episode or atherosclerosis. ACLA was positive at presentation & also on another occasion 6 weeks later. ACLAs were of the IgM type on both occasions. Lupus Anticoagulant & beta2 GPI antibody were negative. DOPPLER of the lower limb arteries did not reveal any abnormality. Patient was successfully treated with multi-drug antileprotics & anticoagulants.

CONCLUSION

Infectious APLAs should be recognized as a cause of thrombosis in Leprosy. Appropriate anticoagulation can salvage limb function.

Для цитирования: Akerkar Shashank M, Bichile Lata S. Leprosy & gangrene: a rare association; role of anti phospholipid antibodies.. BMC infectious diseases. 2005. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2334-5-74.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.