MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3390/cmtr18030033

Медицинская библиотека · Craniomaxillofacial trauma & reconstruction · 2025

Matrix WaveTM System for Mandibulo-Maxillary Fixation-Just Another Variation on the MMF Theme?-Part II: In Context to Self-Made Hybrid Erich Arch Bars and Commercial Hybrid MMF Systems-Literature Review and Analysis of Design Features.

Cornelius Carl-Peter, Liokatis Paris Georgios, Doerr Timothy, Matic Damir, Fusetti Stefano, Rasse Michael, Gellrich Nils Claudius, Heiland Max, Schubert Warren, Buchbinder Daniel

СтатьяОбзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

STUDY

DESIGN

Trends in the utilization of Mandibulo-Maxillary Fixation (MMF) are shifting nowadays from tooth-borne devices over specialized screws to hybrid MMF devices. Hybrid MMF devices come in self-made Erich arch bar modifications and commercial hybrid MMF systems (CHMMFSs).

OBJECTIVE

We survey the available technical/clinical data. Hypothetically, the risk of tooth root damage by transalveolar screws is diminished by a targeting function of the screw holes/slots.

METHODS

We utilize a literature review and graphic displays to disclose parallels and dissimilarities in design and functionality with an in-depth look at the targeting properties.

RESULTS

Self-made hybrid arch bars have limitations to meet low-risk interradicular screw insertion sites. Technical/clinical information on CHMMFSs is unevenly distributed in favor of the SMARTLock System: positive outcome variables are increased speed of application/removal, the possibility to eliminate wiring and stick injuries and screw fixation with standoff of the embodiment along the attached gingiva. Inferred from the SMARTLock System, all four CHMMFs possess potential to effectively prevent tooth root injuries but are subject to their design features and targeting with the screw-receiving holes. The height profile and geometry shape of a CHMMFS may restrict three-dimensional spatial orientation and reach during placement. To bridge between interradicular spaces and tooth equators, where hooks or tie-up-cleats for intermaxillary cerclages should be ideally positioned under biomechanical aspects, can be problematic. The movability of their screw-receiving holes according to all six degrees of freedom differs.

CONCLUSION

CHMMFSs allow simple immobilization of facial fractures involving dental occlusion. The performance in avoiding tooth root damage is a matter of design subtleties.

Для цитирования: Cornelius Carl-Peter, Liokatis Paris Georgios, Doerr Timothy, Matic Damir, Fusetti Stefano, Rasse Michael, Gellrich Nils Claudius, Heiland Max, Schubert Warren, Buchbinder Daniel. Matrix WaveTM System for Mandibulo-Maxillary Fixation-Just Another Variation on the MMF Theme?-Part II: In Context to Self-Made Hybrid Erich Arch Bars and Commercial Hybrid MMF Systems-Literature Review and Analysis of Design Features.. Craniomaxillofacial trauma & reconstruction. 2025. DOI: 10.3390/cmtr18030033.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.