MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s15010-016-0932-9

Медицинская библиотека · Infection · 2016

Synchronous multifocal necrotizing fasciitis prognostic factors: a retrospective case series study in a single center.

Lee Ching-Yu, Li Yen-Yao, Huang Tsan-Wen, Huang Tsung-Yu, Hsu Wei-Hsiu, Tsai Yao-Hung, Huang Jou-Chen, Huang Kuo-Chin

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

PURPOSE: No reports have been published on synchronous multifocal necrotizing fasciitis (SMNF), a multifocal presence of necrotizing fasciitis in different extremities. We evaluated the clinical characteristics and outcomes of SMNF.

METHODS

Eighteen patients (14 men, 4 women; mean age: 59 years) diagnosed with SMNF of the extremities between January 2004 to December 2012 were enrolled and evaluated.

RESULTS

Vibrio species were the most commonly (78%; n = 14) isolated; others were two cases (11%) of Aeromonas spp., one case (6%) of group A β-hemolytic streptococcus, and one case of coagulase-negative staphylococcus. SMNF was in the bilateral lower limbs (72%; n = 13), bilateral upper limbs (17%; n = 3), and one patient with one upper and one lower limb (11%). Non-surviving patients had more bilateral lower limb involvement and thrombocytopenia.

CONCLUSIONS

Most patients with SMNF were male and had bilateral lower limb and marine Gram-negative bacteria involvement. The mortality of SMNF remained extremely high in patients with involvement of bilateral lower limb and initial thrombocytopenia.

Для цитирования: Lee Ching-Yu, Li Yen-Yao, Huang Tsan-Wen, Huang Tsung-Yu, Hsu Wei-Hsiu, Tsai Yao-Hung, Huang Jou-Chen, Huang Kuo-Chin. Synchronous multifocal necrotizing fasciitis prognostic factors: a retrospective case series study in a single center.. Infection. 2016. DOI: 10.1007/s15010-016-0932-9.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.