Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology · 2025
A comparative study of back pain, task-load and presenteeism in nursing homes.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеРандомизированное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Shim Hye Young, Park Jin H, Jeong Sook Hee
Аннотация
PURPOSE: This study utilises cluster-randomized, single-blind, controlled pretest-posttest design to verify the effects of an intervention comprising patient mobility tools on nursing care workers' back pain, task load, and presenteeism.
METHODS: The study was conducted in 2 nursing facilities in G do, involving 40 nursing care workers (the experimental group) who used patient mobility tools and 40 nursing workers (the control group) who provided general nursing care without using patient mobility tools.
RESULTS: Significant differences were observed over time in back pain (F = 14.06, p < 0.001), task load (F = 5.91, p = 0.004), and perceived productivity (F = 41.17, p < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: It can be inferred that patient mobility tools appear to reduce back pain and workload for nursing staff while increasing productivity and advancing the quality of patient care. At the institutional level, the adoption of patient mobility tools may further serve as a strategic measure to reduce staff burden, improve workforce retention, and ensure the sustainability of high-quality care delivery.
METHODS: The study was conducted in 2 nursing facilities in G do, involving 40 nursing care workers (the experimental group) who used patient mobility tools and 40 nursing workers (the control group) who provided general nursing care without using patient mobility tools.
RESULTS: Significant differences were observed over time in back pain (F = 14.06, p < 0.001), task load (F = 5.91, p = 0.004), and perceived productivity (F = 41.17, p < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: It can be inferred that patient mobility tools appear to reduce back pain and workload for nursing staff while increasing productivity and advancing the quality of patient care. At the institutional level, the adoption of patient mobility tools may further serve as a strategic measure to reduce staff burden, improve workforce retention, and ensure the sustainability of high-quality care delivery.