Cellular and humoral immune responses to recombinant 65-kD antigen of Mycobacterium leprae in leprosy patients and healthy controls.

Cellular and humoral immune responses to recombinant 65-kD antigen of Mycobacterium leprae (rML65) were studied in leprosy patients and healthy contacts from a leprosy-endemic population. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells from a considerable proportion of tuberculoid leprosy patients, healthy contacts and non-contacts showed proliferative response to rML65 in vitro. A strong positive correlation was observed between the responses to rML65 and bacille Calmette-Guérin (BCG) or leprosin A. Addition of recombinant IL-2 (rIL-2) enhanced the proportion of responders to rML65 considerably in all groups of leprosy patients, healthy contacts and non-contacts. Among lepromatous patients this enhancement was more pronounced in the bacterial index (BI)-negative group. These results indicate that the 65-kD antigen of Myco. leprae is a dominant T cell immunogen in our study population. Though lepromatous patients showed poor lymphoproliferative response to rML65, their IgG antibody levels to the same antigen were markedly high. Most of the BI-positive lepromatous patients with elevated anti-rML65 IgG levels did not show T cell reactivity even with the addition of rIL-2. On the other hand, tuberculoid leprosy patients, healthy contacts and non-contacts showed good T cell reactivity but low levels of IgG antibodies to rML65, thus indicating the presence of an inverse relationship between cell-mediated and humoral immune responses to a defined protein antigen of Myco. leprae in humans. A significant proportion of individuals among tuberculoid leprosy patients, healthy contacts and non-contacts showed neither T cell reactivity nor elevated levels of IgG antibody to rML65. However, in most of these subjects, a T cell response to rML65 was demonstrable with the addition of rIL-2. These results are discussed with reference to the immunoregulatory mechanisms occurring during Myco. leprae infection on the basis of differential activation of Th1 and Th2 subsets.