Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil) · 2026
Social health organizations and their role in the diffusion of minimally invasive surgery in Brazil.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Tustumi Francisco, Delpino Felipe Mendes, Pincelli João Vitor, Correa Lucas, Wolosker Nelson, Anderson Michael, Kebede Meskerem, Maynou Laia, Hargest Rachel, Friebel Rocco
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: In Brazil, Social Health Organizations (SHOs), a form of public-private partnership, manage a growing number of public hospitals. This study assessed their role in the diffusion of laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
METHODS: In a nationwide study, the rates of laparoscopy were compared over time between SHO and non-SHO hospitals. We applied fixed-effects, Cox, and logistic regression models to examine the association between SHO and laparoscopy use, as well as the speed of laparoscopy adoption.
RESULTS: Of the 2208 hospitals assessed, 83 were SHO-managed. These hospitals exhibited higher laparoscopy rates for both elective and urgent procedures. SHO hospitals had a higher likelihood of reaching ≥ 30% laparoscopy adoption earlier (HR = 2.03; 95% CI: 1.84-2.23), and they reached the adoption threshold approximately one year earlier than non-SHO hospitals (mean time to adoption: 3.7 ± 5 vs. 4.5 ± 4.7 years, respectively).
CONCLUSION: SHO-managed hospitals were associated with faster and broader adoption of laparoscopic surgery within the Brazilian public healthcare system. These findings support the potential of hybrid governance models to enhance the delivery of care in low- and middle-income settings, while acknowledging that residual confounding and selection bias cannot be fully excluded.
METHODS: In a nationwide study, the rates of laparoscopy were compared over time between SHO and non-SHO hospitals. We applied fixed-effects, Cox, and logistic regression models to examine the association between SHO and laparoscopy use, as well as the speed of laparoscopy adoption.
RESULTS: Of the 2208 hospitals assessed, 83 were SHO-managed. These hospitals exhibited higher laparoscopy rates for both elective and urgent procedures. SHO hospitals had a higher likelihood of reaching ≥ 30% laparoscopy adoption earlier (HR = 2.03; 95% CI: 1.84-2.23), and they reached the adoption threshold approximately one year earlier than non-SHO hospitals (mean time to adoption: 3.7 ± 5 vs. 4.5 ± 4.7 years, respectively).
CONCLUSION: SHO-managed hospitals were associated with faster and broader adoption of laparoscopic surgery within the Brazilian public healthcare system. These findings support the potential of hybrid governance models to enhance the delivery of care in low- and middle-income settings, while acknowledging that residual confounding and selection bias cannot be fully excluded.