Usefulness of Prosthesis Made of Antibiotic-Loaded Acrylic Cement as an Alternative Implant in Older Patients With Medical Problems and Periprosthetic Hip Infections: A 2- to 10-Year Follow-Up Study.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes after 2-stage revision with those following single-stage revision in patients who developed periprosthetic joint infection after primary hip arthroplasty.

METHODS: Between January 2004 and January 2013, we retrospectively reviewed patients who developed periprosthetic joint infection after primary hip arthroplasty and who underwent surgery for placement of a prosthesis made of antibiotic-loaded acrylic cement (PROSTALAC). Patients were divided into 2 groups based on the stages of revision. Group A was made up of patients who had undergone 2-stage revision using PROSTALAC as an interim prosthesis. Group B was made up of patients who had been compelled to undergo single-stage revision using PROSTALAC as an alternative implant because of older age and/or medical problems. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using a visual analog scale to score pain by calculating the Harris Hip Score and by determining the patient's walking ability.

RESULTS: There were 20 patients in group A and 19 patients in group B. The mean follow-up period after final surgery was 68.8 months (range, 24-114 months). The infection resolution rate after initial PROSTALAC placement was 92.3%, and the final resolution rate was 94.9%. The visual analog scale and Harris Hip Score of group A were significantly better than those of group B. However, no significant difference in walking ability was found between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSION: Although the clinical outcomes in patients with PROSTALAC implants were not as good as those who underwent 2-stage revision, PROSTALAC can be a useful alternative implant in selected patients who are debilitated because of older age and/or who have critical medical problems.