Gemcitabine as first-line therapy for high-grade non-muscle invasive bladder cancer: results from a tertiary center in the contemporary BCG-shortage era.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
To evaluate the safety profile and efficacy of intravesical gemcitabine as first-line adjuvant therapy for non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) in the setting of ongoing Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) shortage.
METHODS
We performed an institutional, retrospective review of patients treated with intravesical gemcitabine induction and maintenance therapy from March 2019 to October 2021. Patients with intermediate or high-risk NMIBC who were BCG-naïve or experienced a high-grade (HG) recurrence after 12 months since the last dose of BCG were included in the analysis. The primary endpoint was complete response (CR) rate at the 3-month visit. Secondary endpoints were recurrence-free survival (RFS) and assessment of adverse events.
RESULTS
A total of 33 patients were included. All had HG disease and 28 (84.8%) were BCG-naive. The median follow-up was 21.4 months (range, 4.1-39.4). Tumor stages were cTa in 39.4%, cT1 in 54.5%, and cTis in 6.1% of patients. Most patients (90.9%) were in the AUA high-risk category. The 3-month CR was 84.8%. Among patients who achieved CR with adequate follow-up, 86.9% (20/23) remained disease-free at 6 months. The 6-month and 12-month RFS were 87.2% and 76.5%, respectively. The estimated median RFS was not reached. Approximately 78.8% of patients were able to complete full induction. Common adverse events (incidence ≥10%) included dysuria and fatigue/myalgia.
CONCLUSIONS
Intravesical gemcitabine for intermediate and high-risk NMIBC in areas where BCG supply is limited was safe and feasible at short-term follow-up. Larger prospective studies are needed to better ascertain the oncologic efficacy of gemcitabine.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.