MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1111/1756-185x.14749

Медицинская библиотека · International journal of rheumatic diseases · 2023

"Dr ChatGPT": Is it a reliable and useful source for common rheumatic diseases?

Uz Cuma, Umay Ebru

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

AIM: It is inevitable that artificial intelligence applications will be used as a source of information in the field of health in the near future. For this reason, we aimed to evaluate whether ChatGPT, a new Large Language Model, can be used to obtain information about common rheumatic diseases.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

Common rheumatic diseases were identified using the American College of Rheumatology and European League against Rheumatism guidelines. Osteoarthritis (OA), rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis (AS), systemic lupus erythematosus, psoriatic arthritis, fibromyalgia syndrome, and gout were identified by using Google trends for the four most frequently searched keywords on Google. The responses were evaluated with seven-point Likert-type reliability and usefulness scales developed by us.

RESULTS

The highest score in terms of reliability was OA (mean ± standard deviation 5.62 ± 1.17), whereas the highest score in terms of usefulness was AS (mean 5.87 ± 0.17). There was no significant difference in the reliability and usefulness of the answers given by the ChatGPT (p = .423 and p = .387, respectively). All scores ranged between 4 and 7.

CONCLUSIONS

Although ChatGPT is reliable and useful for patients to obtain information about rheumatic diseases, it should be kept in mind that it may give false and misleading answers.

Для цитирования: Uz Cuma, Umay Ebru. "Dr ChatGPT": Is it a reliable and useful source for common rheumatic diseases?. International journal of rheumatic diseases. 2023. DOI: 10.1111/1756-185x.14749.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.