MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1186/s12872-025-05456-3

Медицинская библиотека · BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2025

Distal transradial access for percutaneous coronary intervention: a single-center randomized controlled study (DRAGON study).

Liu Minghao, Du Yuan, Cui Cheng, Zhai Jinwei, Yu Wei, Zhang Hao, Liu Hongmei, He Xiongwei, Shao Zhenxi, Tong Yana, Liu Yan, Song Xiaoyang, Wang Na, Li Ang, Duan Fujian, Li Hui, Song Yiying, Li Can, Yang Yang, Song Ying, Song Lei, Chen Jue, Yuan Jinqing, Yang Weixian, Wu Yongjian, Gao Zhan, Wang Huanhuan, Gao Lijian

СтатьяEquivalence TrialРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Transradial access (TRA) is the standard vascular approach for coronary interventions because it lowers bleeding risk and improves patient comfort. Nevertheless, radial artery occlusion (RAO) remains an important limitation, preventing re-use of the radial artery for subsequent procedures. Distal transradial access (dTRA) has been proposed as a strategy to further reduce RAO while preserving procedural efficacy.

AIMS: To assess whether dTRA reduces early and mid-term RAO compared with conventional TRA in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

METHODS

In this single-center, prospective, randomized, open-label superiority trial, 426 consecutive patients scheduled for elective PCI between July 2023 and January 2024 were assigned 1:1 to dTRA (n = 213) or TRA (n = 213). Duplex ultrasonography was used to assess RAO at 24 h and 30 days.

PRIMARY ENDPOINT: 24-hour RAO; secondary endpoints: 30-day RAO, procedural success, hemostasis time, radiation exposure, and hand/wrist function scores.

RESULTS

One patient withdrew consent, leaving 425 patients (dTRA 213, TRA 212) for analysis. The 24-hour RAO rate was significantly lower in the dTRA group compared to the TRA group (0.5% vs. 8.7%, p < 0.001). At 30 days, RAO remained lower in the dTRA group (1.6% vs. 8.2%, p < 0.001). Median hemostasis time was 3.0 h with dTRA versus 6.0 h with TRA (p < 0.001). Procedural success was comparable between groups (82.2% vs. 80.2%; p = 0.72), as was the fluoroscopy dose (1630.0 mGy [1069.0-2481.0] vs. 1598.0 mGy [1039.0-2512.0], p = 0.73). Early wrist function scores were marginally better in the dTRA group (p = 0.048).

CONCLUSIONS

In elective PCI patients, dTRA significantly reduces RAO incidence and shortens hemostasis time compared to TRA, without compromising procedural success or increasing radiation exposure, while modestly improving early hand function. These data support routine adoption of dTRA for coronary interventions.

TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry: ChiCTR2300073902 (registered on 25 July 2023).

Для цитирования: Liu Minghao, Du Yuan, Cui Cheng, Zhai Jinwei, Yu Wei, Zhang Hao, Liu Hongmei, He Xiongwei, Shao Zhenxi, Tong Yana, Liu Yan, Song Xiaoyang, Wang Na, Li Ang, Duan Fujian, Li Hui, Song Yiying, Li Can, Yang Yang, Song Ying, Song Lei, Chen Jue, Yuan Jinqing, Yang Weixian, Wu Yongjian, Gao Zhan, Wang Huanhuan, Gao Lijian. Distal transradial access for percutaneous coronary intervention: a single-center randomized controlled study (DRAGON study).. BMC cardiovascular disorders. 2025. DOI: 10.1186/s12872-025-05456-3.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.