m+Medelevator.RU
← Поиск публикаций
International medical case reports journal · 2024

Двусторонний реверторный Корнейл Эдема как Новое боковое действие Levetiracatam - доклад по делу.

Клинический случайСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Машинный перевод · не проверен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Didner Nina, Boltz Adrian J, Robison Hannah J, Chandran Avinash, Quinsey Carolyn

Аннотация

КОНТЕКСТ: Столкновения во время атлетики в старших классах средней школы являются серьезной проблемой для здоровья, и исследования, посвященные сотрясениям со временем разрешения симптомов (СРТ) 15 в адрес 28 Дни были ограничены. ЦЕЛЬ: Сопоставление сотрясений, которые имели SRT 15 в адрес 28 дня с сотрясением сотрясения, при котором SRT больше, чем 28 Дни среди американских спортсменов. DESIGN: Диспетчерское эпидемиологическое исследование. Поликлиники спортивной подготовки средней школы. БОЛЬШИЕ УЧАСТНИКИ: Атлеты средней школы. ОСНОВНЫЕ РЕЗУЛЬТАТЫ ИЗМЕРЕНИЯ(Ы): Частота сотрясения, число симптомов и распространенность симптомов.Результаты: среди прочего 917 сообщенные сотрясения (из которых 50.8% отсутствует SRT), 88 :: был зарегистрирован в качестве 15 в адрес 28 дней и 29 :: был зарегистрирован ГРТ как превышающий 28 днями. Более высокая частота сотрясений с SRT 15 число дней и более, зарегистрированных в мужском спорте (n = 78) по сравнению с спортом девочек (n = 39). Мальчики в футболе51.7%) и баскетбол для девочек11.5%), на долю которых приходится наибольшая доля всех сообщенных сотрясений с помощью SRT 15 в адрес 28 дня; мужской футбол58.6%), на долю которых приходится наибольшая доля сотрясений, зарегистрированных при ГРТ, превышающей 28 днями. Среднее число симптомов 6.3 ± 3.4 для сотрясения сотрясением 15 в адрес 28 дней и 7.2 ± 3.8 для тех, у кого ГРТ превышает 28 днями. Наиболее часто регистрируемые симптомы сотрясения со стороны SRT 15 в адрес 28 дней и больше 28 В дни были головная боль, головокружение, чувствительность к свету и трудности с концентрацией. При сотрясении сотрясения с SRT более распространенность раздражительности 15 в адрес 28 дней по сравнению с сотрясениями, при которых ГРТ превышает 28 дней26.1% против 13.8%); визуальные проблемы (см.48.3% против 35.2%) и гиперрастворимость (24.1% против 15.9%) более распространены при сотрясении сотрясений, при этом SRT превышает 28 Дни, хотя различия не были статистически значимыми. ВЫВОДЫ: Симптомы распространенности и общее число были сопоставимы между сотрясениями и СДР 15 в адрес 28 дни и дни, когда СДТ превышает 28 Дни без каких-либо статистически значимых различий, что свидетельствует о том, что симптомное бремя внутри этих групп является более схожим, чем то, что они отличаются.
Оригинал публикации

Bilateral Reversible Corneal Edema as a Novel Side-Effect of Levetiracetam - A Case Report.

CONTEXT: Concussions incurred during high school athletics are a significant health concern, and studies examining concussions with a symptom resolution time (SRT) of 15 to 28 days have been limited.

OBJECTIVE: To compare concussions that had an SRT of 15 to 28 days with concussions that had an SRT of greater than 28 days among US high school athletes.

DESIGN: Descriptive epidemiology study.

SETTING: Secondary school athletic training clinics.

PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: Secondary school athletes.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Concussion frequency, symptom number, and symptom prevalence.

RESULTS: Among all 917 reported concussions (of which 50.8% had missing SRT), 88 had an SRT recorded as 15 to 28 days, and 29 had an SRT recorded as greater than 28 days. Greater frequencies of concussions with an SRT of 15 days or more were reported in boys' sports (n = 78) than girls' sports (n = 39). Boys' football (51.7%) and girls' basketball (11.5%) accounted for the largest proportions of all reported concussions with an SRT of 15 to 28 days; boys' football (58.6%) accounted for the greatest proportion of concussions reported with an SRT greater than 28 days. The average number of symptoms was 6.3 ± 3.4 for concussions with an SRT of 15 to 28 days and 7.2 ± 3.8 for those with an SRT greater than 28 days. The most frequently reported symptoms in concussions with both SRT of 15 to 28 days and greater than 28 days were headache, dizziness, sensitivity to light, and difficulty concentrating. The prevalence of irritability was higher in concussions with an SRT of 15 to 28 days as compared with concussions with an SRT greater than 28 days (26.1% versus 13.8%); visual problems (48.3% versus 35.2%) and hyperexcitability (24.1% versus 15.9%) were more prevalent in concussions with an SRT greater than 28 days, although differences were not statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS: Symptom prevalence and total count were comparable between concussions with an SRT of 15 to 28 days and those with an SRT of greater than 28 days with no statistically significant difference, suggesting that symptom burdens within these groups are more similar than they are different.

Перевод полного текста: Перевод в очереди

Читать найденный полный текст

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/

Скачать полный оригинал PDF с иллюстрациями

CASE REPORT
Bilateral Reversible Corneal Edema as a Novel
Side-Effect of Levetiracetam – A Case Report
Kimberly Caruana
*, Matthew Ellul*, Andre Grixti*
Department of Ophthalmology, Mater Dei Hospital, Imsida, MSD, 2090, Malta
*These authors contributed equally to this work
Correspondence: Kimberly Caruana, Ophthalmology Outpatients, Mater Dei Hospital, Imsida, MSD, 2090, Malta, Email kimberly.caruana27@gmail.com
Purpose: We present a case of levetiracetam-induced corneal edema. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first documented case
of bilateral reversible corneal edema secondary to levetiracetam use.
Patients and Methods: A 59-year-old woman was referred to the ophthalmology department with a few weeks’ history of bilateral
blurring of vision. She is a known case of secondary progressive multiple sclerosis, and she was started on levetiracetam by her
neurologist a few weeks prior to referral in view of new seizure activity. Examination revealed bilateral clinically evident corneal
edema, which was documented on corneal topography.
Results: Upon levetiracetam dose reduction, symptoms started to improve and eventually the medication was stopped altogether. The
patient’s vision and corneal edema normalized on follow-up.
Conclusion: This novel side effect should be kept in mind when a patient who is on levetiracetam presents with corneal edema as this
can avoid misdiagnosis and unnecessary interventions.
Keywords: blurred vision, corneal thickening, multiple sclerosis
Introduction
We present a case of levetiracetam-induced corneal edema. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first documented
case of this medication side-effect. Levetiracetam is an anti-epileptic medication that is used both as monotherapy in the
treatment of focal epilepsy and as an add-on agent for complex or generalised epilepsy. Its mechanism of action is still
not completely understood. One of its modes of action is mediated via adherence to synaptic vesicle 2A. This mediates
calcium-dependent neurotransmitter release. 1,2
Case Report/Case Presentation
We present a case of a 59-year-old lady with a twelve-year history of secondary progressive multiple sclerosis who was
referred to ophthalmology with a few weeks’ history of bilateral blurring of vision.
The patient had no past ophthalmic history and no drug history other than the anti-epileptic medications related to her
multiple sclerosis. Previously documented ophthalmic examinations did not reveal any signs of Fuchs' endothelial
corneal dystrophy, and the patient has no family history of corneal pathology.
The patient had been on amantadine therapy at a dose of 100mg twice daily for the past 7 years and was started on
levetiracetam 250mg twice daily as an add-on agent. Visual deterioration was experienced shortly after commencement
of levetiracetam therapy for a breakthrough seizure.
On examination, the patient’s best corrected visual acuity was 0.5 logMAR right eye and 0.5 logMAR left eye. Slit-
lamp examination revealed corneal edema (shown in Figure 1) involving both eyes and absence of uveitis. Corrected
intraocular pressures were 16mmHg right eye and 18mmHg left eye. Corneal topography was performed which
International Medical Case Reports Journal 2024:17 1069–1074 1069
© 2024 Caruana et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.
php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the
work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For
permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
International Medical Case Reports Journal Dove press
Open Access Full T ext Article
Received: 21 September 2024
Accepted: 18 December 2024
Published: 23 December 2024
International Medical Case Reports Journal downloaded from https://www.dovepress.com/
For personal use only.

confirmed bilateral significant corneal thickening with a right central corneal thickness of 936μm and left central corneal
thickness of 1134μm (shown in Figure 2). The rest of the eye examination was normal.
Since amantadine is a known cause of corneal edema, 3,4 it was agreed with the patient and her caring neurologist to
switch from amantadine to lamotrigine. Levetiracetam therapy was continued at this stage. No improvement in vision
was noted two months after this change in treatment. The patient expressed the wish to temporarily stop levetiracetam on
a trial basis in view of the direct temporal association between the onset of symptoms and the commencement of the
medication.
Amantadine was re-introduced, while levetiracetam dose was tapered. Improvement in vision was noted a few days after
levetiracetam dose reduction. Levetiracetam was stopped altogether, and the patient remained on amantadine and lamo -
trigine. A provisional diagnosis of levetiracetam-induced corneal edema was made at this stage. Her vision normalized and
repeat corneal topography six months after stopping the levetiracetam showed a right central corneal thickness of 567μm
and a left central corneal thickness of 573μm, (shown in Figure 3) and a visual acuity of 0.2 logMAR both eyes. Slit-lamp
examination confirmed clear cornea and the absence of corneal guttata in either eye (shown in Figure 4).
The patient was examined again thirteen months after the first presentation. No further changes in her medications
were made, and her vision had remained stable at 0.2 logMAR in both eyes. Repeat corneal topography showed no
further changes.
Discussion
The primary function of corneal endothelium (CEN) is maintenance of constant corneal thickness and transparency. This
is achieved via tight junctions that form a barrier to diffusion of electrolytes and water from the anterior chamber across
the CEN to the corneal stroma, and via active transport of electrolytes (and passive flow of water) from the corneal
stroma to the anterior chamber. 5
It has been shown in different corneal models (bovine, rabbit and human) that calcium is involved in endothelial
regulation of ion and fluid transport.6 Exposure to a hypotonic environment triggers cells to perform a regulatory volume
decrease, which is mediated via calcium release from intracellular stores. On the other hand, perfusion with a calcium-
free medium results in disruption of endothelial tight junctions, resulting in loss of barrier function with consequent
corneal edema.5
Since some calcium channel blockers influence corneal endothelial calcium levels, these agents have been used
experimentally to elucidate corneal function. While some agents clearly diminish corneal endothelial function and may
Figure 1 Right corneal picture showing corneal oedema with descemet membrane folds. Patient on levetiracetam.
https://doi.org/10.2147/IMCRJ.S497262
DovePress
International Medical Case Reports Journal 2024:17 1070
Caruana et al Dovepress
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

Figure 2 Corneal topography of the patient on levetiracetam treatment showing generalised increased corneal thickness. ( A) Corneal topography right eye showing right
apical thickness of 936 μm (B) Corneal topography left eye showing left apical thickness of 1134 μm.
International Medical Case Reports Journal 2024:17 https://doi.org/10.2147/IMCRJ.S497262
DovePress
1071
Dovepress Caruana et al
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

Figure 3 Corneal T opography of patient off levetiracetam treatment showing normal corneal thickness. ( A)Corneal topography right eye showing right apical corneal
thickness of 572μ (B)Corneal topography left eye showing left apical corneal thickness of 577 μm.
https://doi.org/10.2147/IMCRJ.S497262
DovePress
International Medical Case Reports Journal 2024:17 1072
Caruana et al Dovepress
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

consequently cause corneal edema (for example, nifedipine and diltiazem), other calcium channel blockers have no effect
on the corneal endothelium. These results suggest that L-type calcium channels are the type predominantly expressed in
corneal endothelial cells. 5
In this case, the two drugs of interest were amantadine and levetiracetam. There are documented cases of amantadine-
associated corneal endothelial cell dysfunction with resultant cornea edema 3,4 in the literature and, therefore, amantadine
was stopped first. The patient’s symptoms did not improve after stopping this medication. Since the patient started
experiencing blurred vision shortly after starting levetiracetam, amantadine was re-started and she underwent
a levetiracetam cessation trial, which resulted in resolution of her symptoms and reversal of her corneal edema. The
exact time interval between the initiation of levetiracetam and the development of corneal oedema cannot be accurately
ascertained since the patient presented for an ophthalmic consultation after having been symptomatic for a few weeks.
However, her symptoms improved within days of stopping the levetiracetam.
The temporal correlation between the initiation and cessation of levetiracetam treatment, the onset and resolution of
symptoms, and the clinical and topographic corneal findings points towards a direct association between corneal edema
and levetiracetam use.
Levetiracetam is a newer generation anti-epileptic agent with high bioavailability. It is excreted unchanged in the
kidneys with no effect on the cytochrome P450 enzyme system and therefore has very low interaction with other
medications.7,8 For these reasons, its use in seizure control is increasing, both as a sole agent and as an add-on
medication.7
While the mechanisms of action of levetiracetam are incompletely understood, it has been shown that one mechanism
of action of levetiracetam is inhibition of N, P and L-type calcium channels in the brain, which results in reduced calcium
release from intracellular stores and consequently reduced intracellular calcium levels. 7 Given the key roles played by
calcium in corneal endothelial physiology, this mechanism of action of levetiracetam is a plausible mechanism, which
can explain the corneal side-effect experienced by our patient when the medication was used. Specular microscopy of the
patient, performed after resolution of her corneal edema showed a right corneal endothelial cell count of 1357 cells/mm 2
and a left corneal endothelial cell count of 1299 cells/mm 2 (endothelial cell count normal range: 1500–3500 cells/mm 2).
Taking into consideration the low corneal endothelial cell count, our patient may have been at higher predisposition to
medication-induced corneal edema than patients with normal endothelial cell counts. Moreover, other factors, such as
genetic variables cannot be excluded in this case.
Figure 4 Right corneal picture showing clear cornea. Patient off levetiracetam.
International Medical Case Reports Journal 2024:17 https://doi.org/10.2147/IMCRJ.S497262
DovePress
1073
Dovepress Caruana et al
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

Conclusion
This case is of value as it is the first documented case of corneal edema that was associated with levetiracetam use.
Awareness of this side-effect is vital to avoid misdiagnosis and unnecessary interventions. Corneal transplant surgery,
with all its associated risks, was being considered in this case since primary corneal failure was the main differential
diagnosis.
Abbreviations
CEN, corneal endothelium.
Ethical Statement
Institutional ethical approval was not required for publication.
Informed consent
Patient’s verbal and written consent was obtained to publish this data. Any person identifying information was not
included.
Funding
This study was not supported by any sponsor or funder.
Disclosure
The authors declare no conflict of interest or financial support.
References
1. Hakami T. Neuropharmacology of Antiseizure Drugs. Neuropsychopharm Rep. 2021;41(3):336–351. doi:10.1002/npr2.12196
2. Hilgers A, Schaefer M. Systematic Adverse Drug Reaction Monitoring of Patients Under Newer Antiepileptic Drugs Using Routine Clinical Data of
Inpatients. Drug Real World Outco . 2016;3(2):209–221. doi:10.1007/s40801-016-0077-2
3. Cennamo M, Dragotto F, Favuzza E, Morelli A, Mencucci R. Amantadine therapy for Parkinson’s Disease: in Vivo Confocal Microscopy corneal
findings, case report and revision of literature. BMC Ophthal. 2022;22(1):10.1186/s12886–022–02410–1. doi:10.1186/s12886-022-02410-1
4. Ching Lin C, Yin Cheng C, Pei Shin H, Ching Lin C, Liang Hsu S. Amantadine-related corneal edema and endothelial cell loss: four case reports.
Taiwan J Ophthal. 2014;4(3):137–140. doi:10.1016/j.tjo.2014.04.003
5. Kraus D, Kaiserman I, Frucht-Pery J, Rahamimoff R. Calcium–an “all- round player” in the cornea. Israel Med Ass J . 3(4):269–274.
6. Green K, Cheeks L, David SH. Effects of calcium channel blockers on rabbit corneal endothelial function. Current Eye Rese . 13(6):401–408.
doi:10.3109/02713689408999867
7. Contreras-García IJ, Cárdenas-Rodríguez N, Romo-Mancillas A, et al. Levetiracetam Mechanisms of Action: from Molecules to Systems.
Pharmaceutica. 2022;15(4):475. doi:10.3390/ph15040475
8. Wright C, Downing J, Mungall D, et al. Clinical pharmacology and pharmacokinetics of levetiracetam. Front Neurol. 2013;4:192. PMID: 24363651.
doi:10.3389/fneur.2013.00192
International Medical Case Reports Journal Dovepress
Publish your work in this journal
The International Medical Case Reports Journal is an international, peer-reviewed open-access journal publishing original case reports from all
medical specialties. Previously unpublished medical posters are also accepted relating to any area of clinical or preclinical science. Submissions
should not normally exceed 2,000 words or 4 published pages including figures, diagrams and references. The manuscript management system is
completely online and includes a very quick and fair peer-review system, which is all easy to use. Visit http://www.dovepress.com/testimonials.
php to read real quotes from published authors.
Submit your manuscript here: https://www.dovepress.com/international-medical-case-reports-journal-journal
DovePress International Medical Case Reports Journal 2024:17 1074
Caruana et al Dovepress
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

ИП Урсолов Владлен Сергеевич

ИНН 500118482352 · ОГРНИП 314500117700049

Реквизиты и контакты