Wei sheng yan jiu = Journal of hygiene research · 2004
[Nutrition assessment of transgenic rice].
Аннотация на английскомСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Li Yinghua, Piao Jianhua, Chen Xiaoping, Zhuo Qin
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To observe the nutrition effects between transgenic rice and non-transgenic rice.
METHODS: Wistar rats were divided into three groups according to their sex respectively: transgenic rice group, non-transgenic rice group and AIN93G normal control group. They were fed with corresponding food for 28 days. Indicator as follows: food intake, protein effective ratio, body weight, body length, blood routine test, blood biochemistry test, organ index and bone density.
RESULTS: In male groups, expect that liver/body ratio was higher in transgenic rice group than that in non-transgenic rice group, all other indicators had no significant difference each other. In female groups, liver/body weight ratio, blood calcium and bone density were higher in transgenic group than those in non-transgenic group. All other indicators had no significant difference between transgenic rice group and non-transgenic rice group. Body weight, bone density and blood calcium were higher and liver/body weight ratio had no significant difference in transgenic rice group than those in AIN93G group.
CONCLUSION: Transgenic rice had good nutrition effects on rat development and no toxicity and adverse effects were found in transgenic rice group.
METHODS: Wistar rats were divided into three groups according to their sex respectively: transgenic rice group, non-transgenic rice group and AIN93G normal control group. They were fed with corresponding food for 28 days. Indicator as follows: food intake, protein effective ratio, body weight, body length, blood routine test, blood biochemistry test, organ index and bone density.
RESULTS: In male groups, expect that liver/body ratio was higher in transgenic rice group than that in non-transgenic rice group, all other indicators had no significant difference each other. In female groups, liver/body weight ratio, blood calcium and bone density were higher in transgenic group than those in non-transgenic group. All other indicators had no significant difference between transgenic rice group and non-transgenic rice group. Body weight, bone density and blood calcium were higher and liver/body weight ratio had no significant difference in transgenic rice group than those in AIN93G group.
CONCLUSION: Transgenic rice had good nutrition effects on rat development and no toxicity and adverse effects were found in transgenic rice group.