International orthopaedics · 2021
Comparison of recycled autograft versus allograft in osteosarcoma with pathological fracture.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Wang Pai-Han, Chen Chao-Ming, Chen Cheng-Fong, Chen Wei-Ming, Wu Po-Kuei
Аннотация
PURPOSE: The recycled autograft in biological reconstruction for osteosarcoma has satisfactory outcome. There are few studies about its efficacy in pathological fracture. The aim of the study is to compare the clinical results of recycled autograft to those of allograft in patients with high-grade osteosarcoma with pathological fracture.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between October 2010 and March 2018, 30 patients with osteosarcoma combining pathological fracture underwent biological reconstruction. Eleven patients received recycled autograft via extracorporeal irradiation or freezing nitrogen and nineteen patients restored bone defect via allograft to accomplish biological reconstruction.
RESULTS: The mean follow-up was 58.1 months (range 12-120). The mean time to graft-host union of limbs reconstructed using recycled autografts and allografts was 17.45 ± 13.54 and 12.63 ± 12.62 months, respectively, with no significant difference observed between groups (p = 0.176). The five year probability of graft failure therefore did not significantly differ between groups (p = 0.245). The patient five year survival rate was similar (p = 0.229). Post-operative complication rates were similar for the recycled autograft group (54.5%) and the allograft group (57.9%).
CONCLUSION: The recycled autograft showed comparable clinical results, graft-host union time, complication rate, and graft survival to allograft in biological reconstruction for osteosarcoma with pathological fracture.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between October 2010 and March 2018, 30 patients with osteosarcoma combining pathological fracture underwent biological reconstruction. Eleven patients received recycled autograft via extracorporeal irradiation or freezing nitrogen and nineteen patients restored bone defect via allograft to accomplish biological reconstruction.
RESULTS: The mean follow-up was 58.1 months (range 12-120). The mean time to graft-host union of limbs reconstructed using recycled autografts and allografts was 17.45 ± 13.54 and 12.63 ± 12.62 months, respectively, with no significant difference observed between groups (p = 0.176). The five year probability of graft failure therefore did not significantly differ between groups (p = 0.245). The patient five year survival rate was similar (p = 0.229). Post-operative complication rates were similar for the recycled autograft group (54.5%) and the allograft group (57.9%).
CONCLUSION: The recycled autograft showed comparable clinical results, graft-host union time, complication rate, and graft survival to allograft in biological reconstruction for osteosarcoma with pathological fracture.