Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin · 2018
Integrating hepatitis B, hepatitis C and HIV screening into tuberculosis entry screening for migrants in the Netherlands, 2013 to 2015.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Bil Janneke P, Schrooders Peter Ag, Prins Maria, Kouw Peter M, Klomp Judith He, Scholing Maarten, Huijbregts Lutje Phm, Sonder Gerard Jb, Waegemaekers Toos Chfm, de Vries Henry Jc, Meijer Wieneke, Zuure Freke R, Tostmann Alma
Аннотация
We evaluated uptake and diagnostic outcomes of voluntary hepatitis B (HBV) and C virus (HCV) screening offered during routine tuberculosis entry screening to migrants in Gelderland and Amsterdam, the Netherlands, between 2013 and 2015. In Amsterdam, HIV screening was also offered. Overall, 54% (461/859) accepted screening. Prevalence of chronic HBV infection (HBsAg-positive) and HCV exposure (anti-HCV-positive) in Gelderland was 4.48% (9/201; 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.37-8.29) and 0.99% (2/203; 95% CI: 0.27-3.52), respectively, all infections were newly diagnosed. Prevalence of chronic HBV infection, HCV exposure and chronic HCV infection (HCV RNA-positive) in Amsterdam was 0.39% (1/256; 95% CI: 0.07-2.18), 1.17% (3/256; 95% CI: 0.40-3.39) and 0.39% (1/256; 95% CI: 0.07-2.18), respectively, with all chronic HBV/HCV infections previously diagnosed. No HIV infections were found. In univariate analyses, newly diagnosed chronic HBV infection was more likely in participants migrating for reasons other than work or study (4.35% vs 0.83%; odds ratio (OR) = 5.45; 95% CI: 1.12-26.60) and was less likely in participants in Amsterdam than Gelderland (0.00% vs 4.48%; OR = 0.04; 95% CI: 0.00-0.69). Regional differences in HBV prevalence might be explained by differences in the populations entering compulsory tuberculosis screening. Prescreening selection of migrants based on risk factors merits further exploration.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AdolescentAdultAfricaAntibodies, ViralAsia, SoutheasternCaribbean RegionDelivery of Health Care, IntegratedEurope, EasternFemaleHIV InfectionsHepatitis BHepatitis B Surface AntigensHepatitis CHepatitis C AntibodiesHumansLatin AmericaMaleMass ScreeningMediterranean RegionMiddle AgedNetherlandsPrevalenceSerologic TestsTransients and MigrantsTuberculosisYoung Adult