MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/sap.0000000000002772

Медицинская библиотека · Annals of plastic surgery · 2021

Anylasis of Nail Bed Injuries: Cause, Outcome, Treatment.

Gu Ja Hea, Choi Su Hyun, Yoon Jae Hee

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Although fingertip and nail bed injuries have a high incidence, appropriate management of nail bed injuries remains controversial. This study is the completion of data derived from nail bed injuries with follow-up of a minimum of 6 months to suggest an appropriate treatment.

METHODS

In the retrospective study, we analyzed data from 549 nail bed injuries for 6 years and age, type of injury, fractures, treatment methods, and outcomes were reviewed. Results were determined and these were divided to identical to the opposite group, abnormalities based on Zook criteria. Statistical analysis was done according to injury category (type, site, nail substitute, and fracture) and overall final grade.

RESULTS

Over 50% (293 cases) had excellent results. Rates of very good, good, fair, and poor results were 22.6%, 11.3%, 6.2%, and 6.6%, respectively. Poorer results were obtained for fold injuries, crush, and avulsive injuries. The presence of a fracture was associated with poor results.

CONCLUSIONS

The cause of poor results is thought to be multifactorial. Although, overall outcomes were good, nail splitting, nail roughness, and nail adherence can cause dirtiness, catching, bending, and various cosmetic problems. Thus, careful suture and replacement of nail to nail fold are important to reach good results.

Для цитирования: Gu Ja Hea, Choi Su Hyun, Yoon Jae Hee. Anylasis of Nail Bed Injuries: Cause, Outcome, Treatment.. Annals of plastic surgery. 2021. DOI: 10.1097/sap.0000000000002772.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.