MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.tcr.2024.101087

Медицинская библиотека · Trauma case reports · 2024

Proximal tibial replacement with megaprosthesis in the setting of proximal tibial nonunion: A case report.

Lutnick Ellen, Braun Noah M, Dyskin Evgeny, Bayers-Thering Mary

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Fracture nonunion is a major concern among an orthopaedic patient population, especially in those who have sustained traumatic fractures involving the tibia. Strong risk factors for nonunion include age, smoking history, and a poor diet. The incidence of nonunion also increases with each additional failed surgical intervention.

METHODS

Our retrospective case study involved 56-year-old woman with a history of chronic low back pain, osteopenia, malnutrition, smoking, marijuana use, and alcohol use, who presented with a proximal tibia fracture after a fall, initial treatment included temporization with multiplanar external fixation and subsequent internal fixation. Five weeks later, she presented with atrophic nonunion. She subsequently underwent multiple unsuccessful surgeries to address her nonunion, including open repair with bone grafting and multiplanar external fixation for bone transport. Ultimately, the nonunion was addressed by proximal tibia replacement with megaprosthesis with excellent clinical results.

RESULTS AND

CONCLUSION

Replacement of a proximal tibia with megaprosthesis is a viable option for limb salvage, especially when all alternative treatments have been unsuccessful.

Для цитирования: Lutnick Ellen, Braun Noah M, Dyskin Evgeny, Bayers-Thering Mary. Proximal tibial replacement with megaprosthesis in the setting of proximal tibial nonunion: A case report.. Trauma case reports. 2024. DOI: 10.1016/j.tcr.2024.101087.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.