Causal Relationships Between Total Physical Activity and Ankylosing Spondylitis: A Mendelian Randomization Study.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Currently, there is little literature about the association between physical activity (PA) and the risk of ankylosing spondylitis (AS). The present study aimed to understand the causal relationships between PA and AS.
METHODS
We performed two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) using publicly released genome-wide association studies summary statistics to estimate the causal associations of PA with AS risk. The inverse variance weighted (IVW) method was utilized as primary MR analysis. Furthermore, sensitivity, pleiotropy, and heterogeneity analyses were then conducted to assess the robustness of the findings of the present study.
RESULTS
Results of the IVW analysis suggested a protective relationship between accelerometer-based PA and AS (average acceleration, odds ratio [OR] = 0.9995, 95% CI, 0.9988-0.9999, P = 0.014). On the contrary, there was no causal relationship between accelerometer-based PA (acceleration fraction >425 mg; OR = 0.9981, 95% CI = 0.9936-1.0026, P = 0.402) and AS. Furthermore, there was no significant relationship between self-reported vigorous PA and AS (OR = 1.0005, 95% CI = 0.9875-1.0136, P = 0.943), or even between self-reported moderate-to-vigorous PA and AS (OR = 1.0000, 95% CI, 0.9947-1.0052; P = 0.990).
CONCLUSIONS
The use of genetic approach in the present study revealed that total physical activity (TPA) has a protective relationship with AS risk. Furthermore, it was evident that vigorous PA or moderate-to-vigorous physical levels are not causally associated with AS. Therefore, the present study evidently supports the hypothesis that enhancing TPA rather than PA intensity is an effective prevention strategy for AS.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.