MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.4103/1793-5482.95693

Медицинская библиотека · Asian journal of neurosurgery · 2012

Role of conventional lumbar myelography in the management of sciatica: An experience from Pakistan.

Bakhsh Ahmed

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVES

A prospective study of 80 patients suffering from sciatica was conducted at Fauji Foundation Hospital, Rawalpindi, Pakistan. The aim of this study was to select patients for lumbar myelography on clinical grounds in the absence of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)/computerized tomography (CT) facilities and to know the causes of sciatica.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

All patients underwent conventional lumbar myelography due to lack of MRI facility at a local hospital as well as financial constraints. Myelography was done with radio-opaque dye, Iopamidol, on outpatient basis

RESULTS

Lumbar myelograms were positive in 77.5% and negative in 22.5% cases. Minor complications in the form of headache developed in 32.5% patients but no major complication like meningitis and archnoiditis developed. Lumbar disc prolapse and stenosis were found to be common causes of sciatica. Non-filling of nerve roots was seen in 33.87%, blocks (complete/partial) in 54.83%, and stenosis in 11.29% patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Conventional myelography was found to be safe and an informative diagnostic technique in areas where facility of high-tech investigations like CT/MRI was not available. Conventional lumbar myelography could be recommended and performed with confidence on outdoor basis, in cases of sciatica with positive straight leg raising test, reflex loss, sensory, or motor deficit.

Для цитирования: Bakhsh Ahmed. Role of conventional lumbar myelography in the management of sciatica: An experience from Pakistan.. Asian journal of neurosurgery. 2012. DOI: 10.4103/1793-5482.95693.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.