MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.jhsa.2024.07.001

Медицинская библиотека · The Journal of hand surgery · 2024

Factors Associated With Reoperation After Distal Radius Nonunion Repair.

Stam Mark, Dankelman Lente H M, Wijffels Mathieu M E, Chen Neal C, Bhashyam Abhiram R, Laane Charlotte L E

СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the incidence of, and factors associated with, reoperation after distal radius nonunion repair.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study at a multicenter academic institution and identified adult patients who underwent open reduction and internal fixation for distal radius nonunion between January 2005 and August 2021. Thirty-three patients were included in this study. The cohort consisted of 13 males (13/33) and had a median age of 56 years (interquartile ranges: 49-64). Median follow-up was 59 months (interquartile ranges: 23-126).

RESULTS

Unplanned reoperations occurred in eight of 33 patients. The most common reasons for reoperation were irrigation and debridement for infection, revision surgery for persistent nonunion, and unplanned hardware removal. In total, 10 complications occurred in nine patients. The most common complications were infection and persistent nonunion; both occurred in three cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Complications after distal radius nonunion repair are common. Reoperation after distal radius nonunion repair is required in approximately one of four cases.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognosis IV.

Для цитирования: Stam Mark, Dankelman Lente H M, Wijffels Mathieu M E, Chen Neal C, Bhashyam Abhiram R, Laane Charlotte L E. Factors Associated With Reoperation After Distal Radius Nonunion Repair.. The Journal of hand surgery. 2024. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2024.07.001.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.