MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.ijheh.2013.04.004

Медицинская библиотека · International journal of hygiene and environmental health · 2013

Specific risk factors for contracting Q fever: lessons from the outbreak Jena.

Boden Katharina, Brasche Sabine, Straube Eberhard, Bischof Wolfgang

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

A Q fever outbreak with 331 reported cases in seven weeks occurred in a densely populated residential district in Jena (Germany) in 2005. Prompt identification of a stable infection source follow by an intense information policy, well defined and stable meteorological conditions and a large number of reported cases within one small community all allowed us to study promoting and protecting factors of Q fever. We conducted a cross-sectional study and investigated a part of the affected area for 100% sampling (in-home interviews). Out of 608 residents at home 460 (75.7%) participated in the study and 101 fulfilled our definition of an acute Q fever case. Our data revealed a critical zone for residency within 500 m of herds of gestating ewes in a typical urban dwelling area. We found an association between shift work and contracting Q fever. An association between outdoor activity and Q fever was only found after prolonged outdoor stays, on average more than 4h/day. Only open windows facing the putative source were associated with increased risk of Q fever. Therefore fully open windows of more than 6h/day is a significant parameter.

Для цитирования: Boden Katharina, Brasche Sabine, Straube Eberhard, Bischof Wolfgang. Specific risk factors for contracting Q fever: lessons from the outbreak Jena.. International journal of hygiene and environmental health. 2013. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2013.04.004.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.