MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1136/jitc-2022-005640

Медицинская библиотека · Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2023

Phase I/II study of PexaVec in combination with immune checkpoint inhibition in refractory metastatic colorectal cancer.

Monge Cecilia, Xie Changqing, Myojin Yuta, Coffman Kelley, Hrones Donna Mabry, Wang Sophie, Hernandez Jonathan M, Wood Bradford J, Levy Elliot B, Juburi Israa, Hewitt Stephen M, Kleiner David E, Steinberg Seth M, Figg William D, Redd Bernadette, Homan Philip, Cam Maggie, Ruf Benjamin, Duffy Austin G, Greten Tim F

Клиническое исследование II фазыКлиническое исследование I фазыСтатьяПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАResearch Support, N.I.H., IntramuralПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Oncolytic immunotherapy represents a unique therapeutic platform for the treatment of cancer. Here, we evaluated the safety and efficacy of the combination of pexastimogene devacirepvec (PexaVec) plus durvalumab (anti-programmed death ligand 1) with and without tremelimumab (anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte associated protein 4) in patients with standard chemotherapy refractory mismatch repair proficient (pMMR) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) in a phase I/II trial.

METHODS

Adult patients with histologically confirmed advanced pMMR mCRC, who had progressed on at least two prior lines of systemic chemotherapy were studied in four cohorts. Patients received four doses of PexaVec IV at a dose of 3×108 plaque forming units (pfu) (dose level 1) or 1×109 pfu (dose level 2) every 2 weeks. Twelve days after the first PexaVec administration, patients received either 1500 mg of durvalumab every 28 days alone or an additional single dose of 300 mg tremelimumab on day 1. Responses were assessed every 8 weeks by CT or MRI. AEs were recorded. The primary endpoints were safety and feasibility. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival. Paired tumor samples and peripheral blood were collected to perform immune monitoring.

RESULTS

Thirty-four patients with mCRC enrolled on to the study: 16 patients in the PexaVec/durvalumab cohorts and 18 patients in the PexaVec/durvalumab/tremelimumab cohorts. Overall, the combination of PexaVec plus immune checkpoint inhibitors did not result in any unexpected toxicities. Most common toxicities observed were fever and chills after PexaVec infusion. Two cases of grade 3 colitis, one case of a grade 2 myositis and one case of grade 3 hypotension resulted in discontinuation of immune checkpoint inhibitor and PexaVec treatment, respectively. The median PFS in the PexaVec/durvalumab/tremelimumab cohorts was 2.3 months (95% CI: 2.2 to 3.2 months) vs 2.1 months (95% CI: 1.7 to 2.8 months; p=0.57) in the PexaVec/durvalumab cohorts. Flow cytometry analysis of peripheral blood mononuclear cells revealed an increase in Ki67+CD8+ T cells on treatment.

CONCLUSION

PexaVec in combination with durvalumab and tremelimumab is safe and tolerable. No unexpected toxicities were observed. The combination of PexaVec/durvalumab/tremelimumab demonstrated potential clinical activity in patients with pMMR mCRC, but further studies are needed to identify the predictive biomarkers.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03206073.

Для цитирования: Monge Cecilia, Xie Changqing, Myojin Yuta, Coffman Kelley, Hrones Donna Mabry, Wang Sophie, Hernandez Jonathan M, Wood Bradford J, Levy Elliot B, Juburi Israa, Hewitt Stephen M, Kleiner David E, Steinberg Seth M, Figg William D, Redd Bernadette, Homan Philip, Cam Maggie, Ruf Benjamin, Duffy Austin G, Greten Tim F. Phase I/II study of PexaVec in combination with immune checkpoint inhibition in refractory metastatic colorectal cancer.. Journal for immunotherapy of cancer. 2023. DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2022-005640.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.