MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.bjoms.2021.12.051

Медицинская библиотека · The British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery · 2021

Transport distraction osteogenesis compared with autogenous grafts for ramus-condyle unit reconstruction in temporomandibular joint ankylosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Singh Ashutosh Kumar, Jose Anson, Khanal Nikita, Krishna K C, Chaulagain Rajib, Roychoudhury Ajoy

СтатьяМетаанализСистематический обзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

This systematic review was planned to assess the clinical outcomes of transport distraction osteogenesis (TDO) compared with autogenous grafts for reconstruction of the ramus condyle unit (RCU). We searched Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, Clinicaltrial.gov, and the references of included trials. The primary outcome was maximal incisal opening (MIO). Of the 148 studies retrieved, five were included (TDO = 49, autogenous grafts =123). The mean difference in MIO between TDO and autogenous graft RCU reconstruction, based on the random-effects model was 1.28 mm (95% CI 0.167 to 2.403) in favour of TDO. Re-ankyosis was observed in four cases in the costochondral graft group and none in the TDO group. Reconstruction of the RCU using TDO is comparable to autogenous grafts after the release of TMJ ankylosis, though the evidence is weak considering the small number of trials, high risk of bias, and absence of long-term results.

Для цитирования: Singh Ashutosh Kumar, Jose Anson, Khanal Nikita, Krishna K C, Chaulagain Rajib, Roychoudhury Ajoy. Transport distraction osteogenesis compared with autogenous grafts for ramus-condyle unit reconstruction in temporomandibular joint ankylosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.. The British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery. 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2021.12.051.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.