MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.cjtee.2015.11.021

Медицинская библиотека · Chinese journal of traumatology = Zhonghua chuang shang za zhi · 2016

Comparative study of multiple cancellous screws versus sliding hip screws in femoral neck fractures of young adults.

Gupta Mayank, Arya R-K, Kumar Satish, Jain Vijay-Kumar, Sinha Skand, Naik Ananta-Kumar

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

PURPOSE: Both cannulated cancellous screw (CCS) and sliding hip screw (SHS) are used in femoral neck fracture fixations, but which is superior is yet to be determined. This study was aimed to compare the clinicoradiological outcome of femoral neck fracture treated with SHS or CCS in young adults.

METHODS

Adults (16e60 years) with femoral neck fracture were divided into Group 1 fixed with SHS and Group 2 fixed with three CCS after closed reduction. Pain relief, functional recovery and postoperative radiographs at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months and then yearly for upto 4 years were analyzed.

RESULTS

Group 1 (n=40) achieved radiological union at mean of 7.6 months, with the union rate of 87.5% (n=35), avascular necrosis (AVN) rate of 7.5% (n=3) and mean Harris Hip Score (HHS) of 86.15 at the end of 4 years. In Group 2 (n=45) these parameters were union at 7.1 months, union rate of 82.22% (n=37), AVN rate of 6.67% (n=3) and HHS of 88.65. Comparative results were statistically insignificant.

CONCLUSION

There is no significant difference in clinicoradiological outcome between the two implants.

Для цитирования: Gupta Mayank, Arya R-K, Kumar Satish, Jain Vijay-Kumar, Sinha Skand, Naik Ananta-Kumar. Comparative study of multiple cancellous screws versus sliding hip screws in femoral neck fractures of young adults.. Chinese journal of traumatology = Zhonghua chuang shang za zhi. 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.cjtee.2015.11.021.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.