MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1002/mds.22088

Медицинская библиотека · Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society · 2008

Subthalamotomy in cervical dystonia: A case study of lesion location and clinical outcome.

Moll Christian K E, Hamel Wolfgang, Ostertag Christoph B, Müller Dieter, Finsterbusch Jürgen, Engel Andreas K, Münchau Alexander

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Here we report a 63-year-old woman with primary cervical dystonia (CD) whose symptoms subsided for more than 30 years following a unilateral stereotactic subthalamotomy contralateral to the overactive left sternocleidomastoid muscle but then gradually recurred over a period of several months. The aim of the present study was to correlate the topography of the stereotactic lesion with the long lasting therapeutic effect. High-resolution magnetic resonance imaging and subsequent stereotactic analysis were performed to determine the anatomical localization of the lesion. The primary coagulation focus comprised the posterior subthalamic white matter in the prelemniscal radiation and field H of Forel. Neighboring structures were implicated to various extents. It is suggested that the posterior subthalamic area, with its abundance of interconnecting fibers and related nuclei, represents an effective target for the neurosurgical treatment of CD that may be explored further with deep brain stimulation.

Для цитирования: Moll Christian K E, Hamel Wolfgang, Ostertag Christoph B, Müller Dieter, Finsterbusch Jürgen, Engel Andreas K, Münchau Alexander. Subthalamotomy in cervical dystonia: A case study of lesion location and clinical outcome.. Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society. 2008. DOI: 10.1002/mds.22088.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.