MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.2519/jospt.2025.13468

Медицинская библиотека · The Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy · 2025

Cost-Effectiveness of Single Versus Multiple Sessions of Physical Therapy for Adults With Spinal Disorders: An Economic Evaluation From a Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial.

Lafrance Simon, Thavorn Kednapa, Desmeules François, Gagnon Rose, LaRue Simon, Santaguida Carlo, Bath Brenna, Perreault Kadija, Hébert Luc J, Feldman Debbie, Fernandes Julio, Robert Guertin Jason

СтатьяPragmatic Clinical TrialРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the cost-utility of a single session compared with multiple sessions of physical therapy care for adults with spinal disorders.

DESIGN

Economic evaluation based on a pragmatic randomized controlled trial.

METHODS

Patients with spinal disorders who were referred for a spinal surgery consultation and triaged as nonsurgical cases by an advanced practice physical therapist were randomized to either a single session of education and exercise prescription (n = 52) or multiple sessions (6 sessions) of a multimodal physical therapy intervention (n = 54). Patients answered questionnaires on the health care resources used and related costs, as well as the EuroQol 5-dimension 5-level questionnaire at baseline and at 6, 12, and 26 weeks. Total health care costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were calculated. A cost-utility analysis comparing both groups was conducted using an intention-to-treat approach with multiple imputation to handle missing data. Nonparametric bootstrapping with 1000 resamples was performed. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was subsequently calculated. Sensitivity analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Compared to the single-session group, the multiple-session group incurred a significantly higher total health care costs of CA$368 (95% confidence interval [CI], $327 to $412) and achieved an additional 0.013 QALY (95% CI, 0.009 to 0.018). The ICER for the multiple-session approach was CA$29 787 per QALY gained compared to the single-session approach. Excluding private costs leads to similar results, while the complete-case analysis suggested that the multiple-session approach was not cost-effective.

CONCLUSION

A multiple-session approach may be considered cost-effective compared to a single session of physical therapy for adults with spinal disorders in an advanced practice physical therapy model of care. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2025;55(11):1-8. Epub 29 September 2025. doi:10.2519/jospt.2025.13468.

Для цитирования: Lafrance Simon, Thavorn Kednapa, Desmeules François, Gagnon Rose, LaRue Simon, Santaguida Carlo, Bath Brenna, Perreault Kadija, Hébert Luc J, Feldman Debbie, Fernandes Julio, Robert Guertin Jason. Cost-Effectiveness of Single Versus Multiple Sessions of Physical Therapy for Adults With Spinal Disorders: An Economic Evaluation From a Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial.. The Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy. 2025. DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2025.13468.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.