Canadian journal of diabetes · 2016
Type 2 Diabetes: Model of Factors Associated with Glycemic Control.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Aghili Rokhsareh, Polonsky William H, Valojerdi Ameneh Ebrahim, Malek Mojtaba, Keshtkar Abbas Ali, Esteghamati Alireza, Heyman Mark, Khamseh Mohammad Ebrahim
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the related factors and their intercorrelated impacts on glycemic control in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
METHODS: Patients with type 2 diabetes were recruited for this study during their regular clinic visits at a major medical centre in Iran. Glycated hemoglobin (A1C) levels were used as the indicator of glycemic control. Regression analysis was used to determine the relationships between glycemic control and demographics, self-care behaviours, resources and affective variables. Moreover, the associations between diabetes-related distress and measured variables were tested.
RESULTS: Three hundred eighty people with type 2 diabetes completed the study. The mean duration of diabetes was 8.94±6.57 years, and the mean A1C levels were 7.78%±1.7%. Diabetes-related distress was significantly associated with A1C levels, controlling for all other variables (p=0.01). On the other hand, depression (p<0.001), self-management (p<0.001), anxiety (p<0.001) and patient-physician relationship (p=0.023) were significantly associated with diabetes-related distress.
CONCLUSIONS: Diabetes-related distress was found to be associated with glycemic control in people with type 2 diabetes, whereas age, depression, anxiety, self-management and family and social support may affect glycemic control indirectly through diabetes-related distress. Thus, it is important to assess and, if appropriate, treat people with diabetes for diabetes-related distress in order to identify and help them overcome barriers to optimal glycemic control.
METHODS: Patients with type 2 diabetes were recruited for this study during their regular clinic visits at a major medical centre in Iran. Glycated hemoglobin (A1C) levels were used as the indicator of glycemic control. Regression analysis was used to determine the relationships between glycemic control and demographics, self-care behaviours, resources and affective variables. Moreover, the associations between diabetes-related distress and measured variables were tested.
RESULTS: Three hundred eighty people with type 2 diabetes completed the study. The mean duration of diabetes was 8.94±6.57 years, and the mean A1C levels were 7.78%±1.7%. Diabetes-related distress was significantly associated with A1C levels, controlling for all other variables (p=0.01). On the other hand, depression (p<0.001), self-management (p<0.001), anxiety (p<0.001) and patient-physician relationship (p=0.023) were significantly associated with diabetes-related distress.
CONCLUSIONS: Diabetes-related distress was found to be associated with glycemic control in people with type 2 diabetes, whereas age, depression, anxiety, self-management and family and social support may affect glycemic control indirectly through diabetes-related distress. Thus, it is important to assess and, if appropriate, treat people with diabetes for diabetes-related distress in order to identify and help them overcome barriers to optimal glycemic control.