MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3325/cmj.2010.51.314

Медицинская библиотека · Croatian medical journal · 2010

Evaluation of competitive ELISA for detection of antibodies to Brucella infection in domestic animals.

Perrett Lorraine L, McGiven John A, Brew Simon D, Stack Judy A

Оценочное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

AIM: To evaluate competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (cELISA) for its suitability as an additional serological test for the diagnosis of animal brucellosis.

METHODS

cELISA, which was developed at the Veterinary Laboratories Agency, has been evaluated for its accuracy and suitability as an additional serological test for the diagnosis of animal brucellosis. Samples from naturally and experimentally infected animals and those from Brucella-free flocks and herds were tested.

RESULTS

Data obtained since 1991 were analyzed from routine surveillance, animals experimentally infected with Brucella, and stored sera to validate cELISA for the detection of antibodies to Brucella in cows, small ruminants, and pigs. The sensitivity of the test ranged from 92.31% to 100%, in comparison with 77.14% to 100% for the complement fixation test (CFT). Specificities for cELISA, indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and CFT were greater than 90%.

CONCLUSION

cELISA can be used on a variety of animal species, and an added advantage is its suitability for use on poor-quality samples such as those affected by hemolysis.

Для цитирования: Perrett Lorraine L, McGiven John A, Brew Simon D, Stack Judy A. Evaluation of competitive ELISA for detection of antibodies to Brucella infection in domestic animals.. Croatian medical journal. 2010. DOI: 10.3325/cmj.2010.51.314.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.