MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1093/cid/ciag521

Медицинская библиотека · Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2026

A Multistate Investigation of Serious Adverse Events, including Deaths, following Ceftriaxone Injections, September 2024-August 2025.

Pierce Rebecca, Agarwal Radhika, Kayira Dumbani, Lovegrove Maribeth C, Stone Nimalie D, Hatfield Kelly M, Lyles Jennifer Lind, Morrison Melissa, Stubblefield Wes, Davidson Sherri L, Landers Karen, Harris Scott, Bhattarai Rachana, Dulski Theresa, Stoltey Juliet, Biehle Lauren, Hoffner Josh, Charles Argentina, Wagner JoAnna, Beeman Haley, Curran Michael J, Lee Grace, Moore Riley, Walters Jacy, Patel Gargi, Tran Dat, Sinkevitch Jenna, Tori Marco, Wilson Christopher, Godwin Simone, Hussaini Shehzana, Lafferty Allison G, Bernard Shaina, Ruelle Shannon, Dasenbrock Catherine O, Sheridan Meredith, Wackes Frank, Kapoor Rachna, Gopalaswamy Ramesh, Perkins Kiran M, Adverse Event Investigation Group

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Reports of ceftriaxone serious adverse events (SAEs), including deaths, from multiple jurisdictions during December 2024-January 2025 prompted a nationwide investigation to evaluate product safety, characterize SAEs, and assess for changes in baseline adverse event occurrence via national databases.

METHODS

In February 2025, CDC issued a national call for cases, defined as SAEs involving death or CPR within six hours of ceftriaxone injection, not otherwise explained and occurring in non-ICU settings during September 2024-August 2025. Epidemiologic and clinical data were collected by health departments and reported to CDC. Laboratory testing of ceftriaxone and lidocaine diluent was performed at FDA. Temporal trends in adverse events (2016-2019 vs 2020-2024) were assessed via Medicare claims and National Electronic Injury Surveillance System-Cooperative Adverse Drug Event Surveillance System analyses.

RESULTS

Among 31 cases identified from 27 healthcare facilities (65% outpatient) across 18 states during September 2024-August 2025, all involving death or CPR, 12 (39%) persons died, 23 (74%) had anaphylaxis-type presentations (65% without skin/mucosal involvement), 21 (68%) had previous ceftriaxone exposure, and 24 (77%) had cardiac comorbidities. Median age was 67 years (IQR: 60-81). Antihypertensive use was common (n=19/28, 68%). Product testing revealed no evidence of tampering, adulteration, endotoxin, or purity/potency issues. National adverse event trends were stable across 2016-2019 and 2020-2024.

CONCLUSIONS

SAEs, including deaths, can occur after ceftriaxone receipt. Product testing and trend analyses did not identify evidence of a new safety issue. This investigation highlights the need for ongoing vigilance for ceftriaxone SAEs and reporting to FDA MedWatch.

Для цитирования: Pierce Rebecca, Agarwal Radhika, Kayira Dumbani, Lovegrove Maribeth C, Stone Nimalie D, Hatfield Kelly M, Lyles Jennifer Lind, Morrison Melissa, Stubblefield Wes, Davidson Sherri L, Landers Karen, Harris Scott, Bhattarai Rachana, Dulski Theresa, Stoltey Juliet, Biehle Lauren, Hoffner Josh, Charles Argentina, Wagner JoAnna, Beeman Haley, Curran Michael J, Lee Grace, Moore Riley, Walters Jacy, Patel Gargi, Tran Dat, Sinkevitch Jenna, Tori Marco, Wilson Christopher, Godwin Simone, Hussaini Shehzana, Lafferty Allison G, Bernard Shaina, Ruelle Shannon, Dasenbrock Catherine O, Sheridan Meredith, Wackes Frank, Kapoor Rachna, Gopalaswamy Ramesh, Perkins Kiran M, Adverse Event Investigation Group. A Multistate Investigation of Serious Adverse Events, including Deaths, following Ceftriaxone Injections, September 2024-August 2025.. Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America. 2026. DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciag521.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.