Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2017
Successful adaption of the Banff Patella Instability Instrument (BPII) 2.0 into German.
СтатьяВалидационное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Becher Christoph, Attal René, Balcarek Peter, Dirisamer Florian, Liebensteiner Michael, Pagenstert Geert, Schöttle Philip, Seitlinger Gerd, Wagner Daniel
Аннотация
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to adapt, translate, and validate the Banff Patella Instability Instrument (BPII) 2.0 into German, enabling its use by German-speaking professionals for the evaluation of patients who present with patellofemoral instability.
METHODS: Forward and backward translation was performed according to international recommendations. The final German version of the BPII 2.0 was investigated in patients with confirmed diagnoses of recurrent patellofemoral instability in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland. All patients received two packages of questionnaires, each containing the BPII 2.0, Kujala scoring questionnaire, Norwich Patella Instability scoring questionnaire, Short Form-36 (SF-36), and a visual analogue scale (VAS)-scale for pain and disability. The first and second packages of questionnaires were to be completed 7 days apart. The following parameters were assessed: internal consistency, test-retest reliability, floor and ceiling effects, and construct validity.
RESULTS: The study population consisted of 64 patients (24 males and 40 females). The average age of the patients was 22 ± 6 years. The internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha) was excellent at both time points (0.93 and 0.95), and the test-retest reliability (ICC) was good (0.89). There were no floor or ceiling effects. There were statistically significant correlations between the BPII 2.0 and all other outcome measures apart from SF-36 mental health.
CONCLUSION: The BPII 2.0 was successfully adapted into German. It is a reliable and valid instrument for evaluation of German-speaking patients who present with patellofemoral instability.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.
METHODS: Forward and backward translation was performed according to international recommendations. The final German version of the BPII 2.0 was investigated in patients with confirmed diagnoses of recurrent patellofemoral instability in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland. All patients received two packages of questionnaires, each containing the BPII 2.0, Kujala scoring questionnaire, Norwich Patella Instability scoring questionnaire, Short Form-36 (SF-36), and a visual analogue scale (VAS)-scale for pain and disability. The first and second packages of questionnaires were to be completed 7 days apart. The following parameters were assessed: internal consistency, test-retest reliability, floor and ceiling effects, and construct validity.
RESULTS: The study population consisted of 64 patients (24 males and 40 females). The average age of the patients was 22 ± 6 years. The internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha) was excellent at both time points (0.93 and 0.95), and the test-retest reliability (ICC) was good (0.89). There were no floor or ceiling effects. There were statistically significant correlations between the BPII 2.0 and all other outcome measures apart from SF-36 mental health.
CONCLUSION: The BPII 2.0 was successfully adapted into German. It is a reliable and valid instrument for evaluation of German-speaking patients who present with patellofemoral instability.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.