DOI 10.1111/j.1751-0813.2000.tb10507.x
Application of ERIC-PCR for the comparison of isolates of Haemophilus parasuis.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE
To validate a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) based method. Enterobacterial Repetitive Intergenic Consensus-PCR (ERIC-PCR), for the fingerprinting of Haemophilus parasuis strains and to use that method to differentiate isolates from apparently related outbreaks of Glässer's disease on three pig farms.
DESIGN
ERIC-PCR was evaluated by comparing 15 different strains that represented all 15 recognised serovars in the Kielstein-Rapp-Gabrielson (KRG) scheme for serotyping H parasuis. Next, ERIC-PCR was used to examine 14 Australian field isolates of H parasuis; 12 collected from three farms suffering apparently related outbreaks of Glässer's disease and two from two other farms with no known connection.
RESULTS
The 15 serovar reference strains all gave unique, reproducible ERIC-PCR fingerprints. The 12 isolates from the three apparently related outbreaks all gave a single fingerprint, which was distinct from any seen in the 15 serovar reference strains and the two other Australian field isolates in the studied farms. The confirmation that all 12 isolates were the same strain allowed the development of a prevention and control program that has prevented the emergence of any further outbreaks of Glässer's disease on the three farms.
CONCLUSION
ERIC-PCR is a suitable technique for the differentiation of unrelated strains of H parasuis. The finding that the 12 field isolates of H parasuis all shared the same fingerprint is strong evidence that there was a common source of infection on all three farms. This study has shown, for the first time, that ERIC-PCR is a suitable technique for the sub-typing of H parasuis and useful for studying the epidemiology of outbreaks of Glässer's disease.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.